Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
Thu Jan 25, 2018, 09:36 PM Jan 2018

Trump Appointee Is Trying to Squelch Us, Labor Board Staff Says

Source: New York Times


By NOAM SCHEIBER
JAN. 25, 2018

The Trump administration’s efforts to reverse the direction of federal labor policy appear to have accelerated with a proposal to demote the senior civil servants who resolve most labor cases.

Under the proposal, those civil servants — considered by many conservatives and employers to be biased toward labor — would answer to a small cadre of officials installed above them in the National Labor Relations Board’s hierarchy.

The proposal could pave the way for a pronounced shift in the day-to-day workings of the agency, making it friendlier to employers named in complaints of unfair labor practices or facing unionization drives.

Peter B. Robb, the agency’s general counsel and a Trump appointee, outlined the proposal this month in a conference call with the civil servants, known as regional directors, according to a letter sent by the directors to Mr. Robb.



Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/business/economy/labor-board.html?ribbon-ad-idx=5&rref=politics&module=Ribbon&version=context&region=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Politics&pgtype=article

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump Appointee Is Trying to Squelch Us, Labor Board Staff Says (Original Post) Judi Lynn Jan 2018 OP
If it's legal, I don't think they can do anything about it. Honeycombe8 Jan 2018 #1
And any union people who voted for Cheeto Benito The Mouth Jan 2018 #2
Oh right, because of jill stein. elleng Jan 2018 #3
And Susan Sarandon!!! QC Jan 2018 #4
Votes for Stein took votes from Clinton. Nader-Gore redux. But no one here did that. Honeycombe8 Jan 2018 #5
I remember how Obama and the Democrats made card check a big priority wobblie Jan 2018 #6
Of course. This was implicit in passage of power to the GOP. Hortensis Jan 2018 #7

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
1. If it's legal, I don't think they can do anything about it.
Thu Jan 25, 2018, 09:41 PM
Jan 2018

Elections have consequences. I hope those people in the country who voted for Jill Stein are seeing that. Every department and agency is being squelched and dismantled.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
5. Votes for Stein took votes from Clinton. Nader-Gore redux. But no one here did that.
Thu Jan 25, 2018, 11:58 PM
Jan 2018

I mean, this is a Democratic Party site.

 

wobblie

(61 posts)
6. I remember how Obama and the Democrats made card check a big priority
Fri Jan 26, 2018, 07:10 AM
Jan 2018

Not--Said he would walk in our picket lines--not.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
7. Of course. This was implicit in passage of power to the GOP.
Fri Jan 26, 2018, 09:36 AM
Jan 2018

Dismantling, not just impeding, our systems is being carried out all through the federal government.

And it's also been happening in the 26 states similarly governed by Republican trifectas.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump Appointee Is Trying...