Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
Thu Jan 25, 2018, 11:03 PM Jan 2018

U.S. EPA reverses policy on 'major sources' of pollution

Source: Reuters

JANUARY 25, 2018 / 8:37 PM / UPDATED 23 MINUTES AGO

 
Eric Beech
 
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said on Thursday it was withdrawing a provision of the Clean Air Act that requires a major source of pollution like a power plant to always be treated as a major source, even if it makes changes to reduce emissions.

The decision to withdraw the “once-in always-in” policy is part of President Donald Trump’s effort to roll back federal regulations and was sought by utilities, the petroleum industry and others.

Sources of air pollution previously classified as “major sources” may be reclassified as “area” sources when the facility limits its emissions below “major source” thresholds, the EPA said. Area sources are subject to less strict pollution control standards than major sources.

“It will reduce regulatory burden for industries and the states, while continuing to ensure stringent and effective controls on hazardous air pollutants,” Bill Wehrum, assistant administrator of the EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation, said in a statement.

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-epa/u-s-epa-reverses-policy-on-major-sources-of-pollution-idUSKBN1FF075

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. EPA reverses policy on 'major sources' of pollution (Original Post) Judi Lynn Jan 2018 OP
reduces polluters 'burden' and kills us Marthe48 Jan 2018 #1
I am so glad Macron made fun of him in Davos the other day. BigmanPigman Jan 2018 #2
"while continuing to ensure stringent and effective controls on hazardous air pollutants, yonder Jan 2018 #3
The planet will kill us before we kill it disalitervisum Jan 2018 #4
The EPA releases a new "study".... SergeStorms Jan 2018 #5
As a long-time conservationist, I'm not sure I understand why this change is a bad thing. Nitram Jan 2018 #6

BigmanPigman

(51,608 posts)
2. I am so glad Macron made fun of him in Davos the other day.
Thu Jan 25, 2018, 11:44 PM
Jan 2018

He said, "I am glad we don't have any Climate Change skeptics here today". I am sure the sarcasm went over the fucking moron's bald head.

yonder

(9,666 posts)
3. "while continuing to ensure stringent and effective controls on hazardous air pollutants,
Fri Jan 26, 2018, 12:12 AM
Jan 2018

my ass it will

 

disalitervisum

(470 posts)
4. The planet will kill us before we kill it
Fri Jan 26, 2018, 12:48 AM
Jan 2018

The overweening conceit of our primitive war-mongering backward race will result in extinction, leaving the planet to heal itself and eventually be discovered by a space-faring species that is worthy of it.

SergeStorms

(19,201 posts)
5. The EPA releases a new "study"....
Fri Jan 26, 2018, 04:41 AM
Jan 2018

whereby they find trees to be the world's "major polluter". Trump has ordered the removal of all trees from Federal land.

Is this really necessary?

Nitram

(22,813 posts)
6. As a long-time conservationist, I'm not sure I understand why this change is a bad thing.
Fri Jan 26, 2018, 12:36 PM
Jan 2018

If a polluter brings emission levels below a certain level, why not acknowledge that by reducing threat level that polluter poses? Am I missing something here?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. EPA reverses policy ...