Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UpInArms

(51,284 posts)
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 01:28 PM Feb 2018

White House pressing Pentagon for plan on North Korea attack

Source: The Hill

The White House is growing increasingly impatient with senior military officials at the Pentagon over the lack of a strategy for a preventative military strike against North Korea, The New York Times reported Friday.

National security adviser H.R. McMaster has reportedly pressed military leaders for a strategy due to his desire to keep all options on the table, but Pentagon officials worry that presenting the White House with a strategy will make a preventative strike more likely.

The Times cited unnamed White House officials who said the Pentagon was worried President Trump and his team were moving too quickly toward military action against North Korea.

Pentagon press secretary Dana White said that reports of a delay in presenting the information to McMaster were "false." Defense Secretary James Mattis “regularly provides the president with a deep arsenal of military options," White told the Times.

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/371976-white-house-wants-plan-from-pentagon-on-north-korea-military-attack

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House pressing Pentagon for plan on North Korea attack (Original Post) UpInArms Feb 2018 OP
Assholes hibbing Feb 2018 #1
Especially since WH insiders have all but admitted Blue_Tires Feb 2018 #37
Don't they already have one? Astraea Feb 2018 #2
They do have one. They just won't give it to him. MGKrebs Feb 2018 #9
Wheeeee fun. Saviolo Feb 2018 #3
He can't even pick his own staff, staff that stays on the job and provides Sophia4 Feb 2018 #28
Put him off a few more months, guys. louis-t Feb 2018 #4
It takes two to tango Baclava Feb 2018 #24
Donnie Dotard will be sooo jealous. louis-t Feb 2018 #31
and there's the distraction Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2018 #5
Doesn't he understand Cold War Spook Feb 2018 #6
N Korea does not have enough long range missiles to destroy Japan. EX500rider Feb 2018 #7
But, logic and reason may not really apply to N.K. MGKrebs Feb 2018 #10
China does have the capacity to take out South Korea and Japan and would. Cold War Spook Feb 2018 #12
Actually the combined military's of S Korea, Japan & the US would crush China on the offensive. EX500rider Feb 2018 #13
What we are discussing here Cold War Spook Feb 2018 #14
The US attacks N Korea, so China HAS to attack S Korea?? Why? EX500rider Feb 2018 #15
To stop South Korea from attacking a weakened North Korea. Cold War Spook Feb 2018 #17
If S Korea stays on the sidelines China would be stupid to drag them in, plus they'd lose.. EX500rider Feb 2018 #18
What about the 10,000 to 15,000 Cold War Spook Feb 2018 #20
Seoul has bomb shelter for their entire population plus visitors. EX500rider Feb 2018 #22
Yes, I'm sure it will be "just lovely" maxrandb Feb 2018 #34
China is not stupid and will do whatever is in her best interest. EX500rider Feb 2018 #35
Yes, it's all so simple maxrandb Feb 2018 #36
No, not in favor of thousands of US troops being killed. EX500rider Feb 2018 #38
Well, Trump needs......... SergeStorms Feb 2018 #8
The fact is, we don't have any non-nuclear options here NickB79 Feb 2018 #11
Could do it with conventional forces also. EX500rider Feb 2018 #16
Meanwhile, Cold War Spook Feb 2018 #19
During a Special Forces raid in the north of the country.. EX500rider Feb 2018 #21
Where are you getting this information that China won't attack South Korea. Cold War Spook Feb 2018 #29
China will do what is her best interest, regardless of any treaties. EX500rider Feb 2018 #30
You should not have used "lol" and I should not have brougt it us. Cold War Spook Feb 2018 #32
Time to take the big red button away from Li'l Donnie FakeNoose Feb 2018 #23
Time for the 25th Amendment if Orange Turd is serious YessirAtsaFact Feb 2018 #25
Delay, delay, delay. Please. Hekate Feb 2018 #26
That Trump is seriously considering FuzzyRabbit Feb 2018 #27
Cadet Bone Spurs is sure brave with other peoples kids isn't he? workinclasszero Feb 2018 #33

hibbing

(10,098 posts)
1. Assholes
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 01:47 PM
Feb 2018

Kind of a weird feeling to be more afraid of your own government and their actions than those of N. Korea.


Peace

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
37. Especially since WH insiders have all but admitted
Mon Feb 5, 2018, 01:47 PM
Feb 2018

Trump is considering this because someone put it in his tiny head that this stunt would be the only thing that can save the GOP in November...

Astraea

(468 posts)
2. Don't they already have one?
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 01:53 PM
Feb 2018

I thought the military always had plans, in the odd chance that something like this would happen.

Saviolo

(3,282 posts)
3. Wheeeee fun.
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 01:55 PM
Feb 2018

Actually, that should be No FUN: No First Use Nuclear.

Preventive strikes only encourage retaliatory strikes. Trump is just trying to drum up the war he so obviously desperately wants. He wants to be a wartime president so he can be a big tough man and order around all the big guns. Also, the nation tends to rally behind the president at times of war. He doesn't care who gets hurt or killed as he bangs the drums. It's all for personal aggrandizement and political deflection/protection.

 

Sophia4

(3,515 posts)
28. He can't even pick his own staff, staff that stays on the job and provides
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 01:36 AM
Feb 2018

steady coordination and builds trust in the White House.

I'd hate to see him trying to command and coordinate the military. He'd be firing the generals all the time. It would be chaos.

To successfully wage war, you need a very mature temperament. That's because there are always challenges, always difficult moments. Trump's reaction to a difficult moment, a challenge, is to fire someone or to make them so uncomfortable that they quit on him.

Besides he would infuriate the troops by insulting them whenever things got tough, and they get tough a lot in wars.

Trump and a war would be a disaster for us in America.

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
24. It takes two to tango
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 09:59 PM
Feb 2018

Let the games begin


North Korea to Parade Dozens of Long-Range Missiles Before Winter Olympics




The parade is expected to include dozens of intercontinental-range Hwasong-15 missiles, which the North Koreans test-fired for the first time in late November, the sources said.

The news comes after US President Donald Trump delivered his first State of the Union speech, during which he criticized the Kim Jong Un regime’s human rights abuses and “reckless pursuit” of nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles that could soon threaten the US homeland.

http://ktla.com/2018/01/31/north-kor...-olympics/amp/

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,348 posts)
5. and there's the distraction
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 02:20 PM
Feb 2018

The crutches in SOTU, the meeting in the oval office, the investigation closing in -- nukes for distraction.

Time to remove the thing in the Whitehouse, the co-conspirators, and every illegimately appointed wrecking ball in the cabinet and judiciary.

Lock them ALL up.

 

Cold War Spook

(1,279 posts)
6. Doesn't he understand
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 02:43 PM
Feb 2018

that there is a treaty between North Korea and China that would bring China into the war? Of course it could be a small war where only North Korea, South Korea and Japan are destroyed.

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
7. N Korea does not have enough long range missiles to destroy Japan.
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 03:55 PM
Feb 2018

And no way China wants to take on S Korea, Japan and the US at the same time.

MGKrebs

(8,138 posts)
10. But, logic and reason may not really apply to N.K.
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 05:26 PM
Feb 2018

And if N.K. starts something and we get involved, China likely will too, as they do not want us on their doorstep there.

Hopefully it would be a kind of gentlemans agreement where we do the dirty work and China goes in to do the clean up/rebuild.

 

Cold War Spook

(1,279 posts)
12. China does have the capacity to take out South Korea and Japan and would.
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 06:58 PM
Feb 2018

Why, because it is known that there is a treaty and if China didn't respond she would lose face. At that point China would let the US know that the war stops there. The US would be stupid to continue. The US does not have the same feeling about saving face.

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
13. Actually the combined military's of S Korea, Japan & the US would crush China on the offensive.
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 07:17 PM
Feb 2018

Only way they could take out S Korea and Japan would be with nukes, and then the US would glass over China.

 

Cold War Spook

(1,279 posts)
14. What we are discussing here
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 07:40 PM
Feb 2018

is an attack by the US on a sovereign nation. Accordingly the UN would consider this an act of war by the US. At this point China has to at least attack South Korea. At that point, China would let the US know that it is willing to stop it there. The US would be stupid to do anything further. Yes, the US would win any war, but how many cities are we willing to lose?

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
15. The US attacks N Korea, so China HAS to attack S Korea?? Why?
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 07:43 PM
Feb 2018

Don't think so.
And no way China would use any nukes in a conflict with a country with magnitudes more nukes plus a limited ABM system.

 

Cold War Spook

(1,279 posts)
17. To stop South Korea from attacking a weakened North Korea.
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 07:58 PM
Feb 2018

Okay the US attacks North Korea. China has to attack South Korea because South Korea is an ally of the US and if North Korea is weakened China knows that South Korea will attack North Korea.. North Korea has been attacked by an aggressor. The least China can do is attack South Korea. I do doubt that either side would use nuclear weapons.

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
18. If S Korea stays on the sidelines China would be stupid to drag them in, plus they'd lose..
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 08:02 PM
Feb 2018

...any leverage they had at the UN by being the aggressor against S Korea.
Now N Korea I do believe would strike out at S Korea.

 

Cold War Spook

(1,279 posts)
20. What about the 10,000 to 15,000
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 08:15 PM
Feb 2018

cannons and rocket launchers that North Korea has aimed at Seoul? China would not be considered an aggressor since they would believe that South Korea would attack a weakened North Korea.

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
22. Seoul has bomb shelter for their entire population plus visitors.
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 08:23 PM
Feb 2018
The biggest anticipated cost of a North Korean artillery barrage in response to an attack would be the at least partial destruction of Seoul. But the volume of fire that the North can direct against the South Korean capital is limited by some important factors. Of the vast artillery force deployed by the North along the border, only a small portion — Koksan 170-mm self-propelled guns, as well as 240-mm and 300-mm multiple launch rocket systems — are capable of actually reaching Seoul. Broadly speaking, the bulk of Pyongyang's artillery can reach only into the northern border area of South Korea or the northern outskirts of Seoul.
All forms of North Korean artillery have problems with volume and effectiveness of fire, but those issues are often more pronounced for the longer-range systems. Problems include the high malfunction rate of indigenous ammunition, poorly trained artillery crews, and a reluctance to expend critical artillery assets by exposing their positions.
Based on the few artillery skirmishes that have occurred, roughly 25 percent of North Korean shells and rockets fail to detonate on target. Even allowing for improvements and assuming a massive counterstrike artillery volley would be more successful, a failure rate as high as 15 percent would take a significant bite out of the actual explosive power on target. The rate of fire and accuracy of North Korean artillery systems is also expected to be subpar. This belief is founded on the observably poor performance of North Korean artillery crews during past skirmishes and exercises. Though inaccuracy is less noticeable in a tactical sense — especially as part of a "countervalue attack," where civilian areas are targeted — at the higher level an artillery retaliation rapidly becomes a numbers game.
Ineffective crews also rapidly curtail the potential for severe damage. Rate of fire is crucial to the survivability of artillery systems — the name of the game is to get the most rounds on target in the shortest period of time, lest your position be identified and destroyed before the fire mission is complete. Poor training translates to a greatly reduced volume of fire and a painfully limited duration of effectiveness.


https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/how-north-korea-would-retaliate

maxrandb

(15,330 posts)
34. Yes, I'm sure it will be "just lovely"
Mon Feb 5, 2018, 08:15 AM
Feb 2018

Only a few million dead and World War III. All to stoke Donnie Short Fingers ego.

Please look up what Japan did to the innocent population of China prior to and during WWII, and then tell me if China will allow a Japan/American ally on their boarder?

Hell, China wouldn't even need to attack South Korea...they could just start dumping our debt.

But, make no mistake! China will not allow North Korea to fall without a brutal fight.

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
35. China is not stupid and will do whatever is in her best interest.
Mon Feb 5, 2018, 12:19 PM
Feb 2018

That includes not taking on the 3 premier hi-tech military's in the area at the same time, S Korea, Japan and the US.
Yes they could dump our debt....we could also embargo all Chinese imports to the US, which would destroy their economy in short order. Plus we could make a back room deal, we take out their nuclear/missile capabilities, then they move in and install whatever puppet govt they want.

maxrandb

(15,330 posts)
36. Yes, it's all so simple
Mon Feb 5, 2018, 01:39 PM
Feb 2018

Maybe Donnie Short Fingers will put you on the case.

There is a reason that millions of Chinese forces crossed into North Korea and pushed us back to the 38th Parallel. That reason still exists.

"During WWII the Japanese invaded China by first occupying Taiwan, then invading Korea, from there to the northern provinces of China, then pushed southward towards the rest of the country. In 1950 the U.S. appeared to repeat the same invasion path - first Taiwan, then Korea. The U.S. first told China that it would not cross the 38th parallel, it crossed it. Then it said it would not cross the 40th parallel, it crossed it. Then it said it would stop 40 miles away from the Yalu River, then it bombed it. By then China became convinced that the real target of the U.S. was China. They attacked with overwhelming force that surprised the Americans and pushed UN forces back to the 38th Parallel.

I'm a little confused. Are you in favor of thousands of American troops being killed and potentially millions of innocents on the Korean Peninsula, just so Donnie Short Fingers shaking his tiny dick at Kim?

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
38. No, not in favor of thousands of US troops being killed.
Mon Feb 5, 2018, 02:25 PM
Feb 2018

However I am also not in favor of allowing N Korea to get enough ICBM's with nukes to be able to nuke a lot of American cities.

SergeStorms

(19,201 posts)
8. Well, Trump needs.........
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 05:05 PM
Feb 2018

a great big, LOOK OVER THERE!

War-time Presidents always get the best poll numbers, and Trump's would definitely be THE BIGGEST WAR-TIME PRESIDENT POLL NUMBERS EVER!

NickB79

(19,246 posts)
11. The fact is, we don't have any non-nuclear options here
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 05:49 PM
Feb 2018

A first strike would target their nuclear capabilities, but those are so dug in that bunker busters aren't effective enough to guarantee a good chance of disabling them.

You'd need to use tactical nuclear warheads.

And if we go down this road, God help us.

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
16. Could do it with conventional forces also.
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 07:47 PM
Feb 2018

Rangers jump in and secure the area, Delta Force/SEALS go in and destroy the target while US air forces prevent reinforcement, while striking command & control nodes, jamming coms and blowing up bottlenecks like bridges etc.
It wouldn't be pretty though.

 

Cold War Spook

(1,279 posts)
19. Meanwhile,
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 08:09 PM
Feb 2018

what do you think those 10,000 to 15,000 cannons and rocket launchers aimed at Seoul will be doing. And China has not even come in to it yet. Remember the treaty between China and North Korea.

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
21. During a Special Forces raid in the north of the country..
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 08:19 PM
Feb 2018

....it's unknown if they would strike south, I think they'd be more likely to send everything north to strike at the incursion.
And Seoul has bomb shelters for their entire population.

I think they'd do the math and realize a limited US strike would be easier to ride out then a conventional war with S Korea and the US which would result in their regimes demise.
And I think China would make a lot of noise but are too smart to get in a hot war with the US.

 

Cold War Spook

(1,279 posts)
29. Where are you getting this information that China won't attack South Korea.
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 11:52 AM
Feb 2018

If I am remembering correctly, didn't China help North Korea once before? And I bet that they won't warn Seoul. By the way, most shelters do no have food, water or medical kits. They don't even have enough money in their budget to do anything about the shelters.

Okay so far you have been wrong on every point. I will give you one more shot before I forget you exist. To show how unintelligent you are, I have Parkinson's dementia and vascular dementia. It might take me half an hour or more to write a post, but I get it done.

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
30. China will do what is her best interest, regardless of any treaties.
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 12:43 PM
Feb 2018

China also remembers the ass kicking they got last time they helped N Korea, with over 600,000 KIA/MIA.
The S Korean military can deliver MRE's and water if needed to shelters, not like they will have to be done there forever, the N Koreans have a finite amount of ammo and will start losing batteries to counter-fire right away. The volume of fire will drop sooner then later.

You haven't shown me to be wrong on anything, you've just shown you have a different opinion.

In a recent post you said I lost the post by putting in "lol".
I find when you stoop to insulting the other posters intelligence you have definitely conceded and lost.

 

Cold War Spook

(1,279 posts)
32. You should not have used "lol" and I should not have brougt it us.
Sun Feb 4, 2018, 10:42 AM
Feb 2018

Be that as it may. South Korea had almost as many civilians killed as the Chinese military. Which country do you think fears a war more. As far as the shelters go, most do not even have a sign so people can find them. Now for the North Korean batteries aimed at Seoul, you are right. South Korea, North Korea, China and Russia, none of them wants a war. I put in Russia because it has a border with North Korea and if there is a war it has to decide whether or not to enter the war probably will depend on the safety of that border. The US should also not want a war. The North Koreans could get lucky and take out a US city. The US missile defense does not work well in a test when the system operators know where and when the missile will hit. If missile has countermeasures it's going to hit its target. Japan has the same problem with its shelters which are from WWII. They don't even repair them any more. Lastly, the belligerent talk on both sides is not helping.

FakeNoose

(32,639 posts)
23. Time to take the big red button away from Li'l Donnie
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 09:34 PM
Feb 2018

Playtime is over Donnie. Let's give this to the grown-ups now.



YessirAtsaFact

(2,064 posts)
25. Time for the 25th Amendment if Orange Turd is serious
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 11:59 PM
Feb 2018

Pence is an asshole, but he isn't completely nuts.

FuzzyRabbit

(1,967 posts)
27. That Trump is seriously considering
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 12:34 AM
Feb 2018

an attack on North Korea is an incredibly frightening thought.

And the reason he considers doing it is because he thinks that being a war president will make him more popular. Trump is always focused on his "ratings". He thinks of the world, and his presidency, as a TV show. He perhaps hopes his war will give him huge ratings.

He has no conception of the consequences of nuclear war. Remember, during the campaign when Trump asked that since we had nuclear weapons why aren't we using them? That's scary enough.

But maybe he just doesn't care how much damage and how many human beings will suffer and die for his popularity. That is psychotic on the grandest, scariest scale.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House pressing Pent...