Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 04:47 PM Feb 2018

Russia has started the delivery of T-90S MBT tanks to Iraq

Source: GLOBAL DEFENCE & SECURITY NEWS

In July 2017, it was announced that Iraq has purchased 73 main battle tanks (MBTs) to Russian Company Uralvagonzavod including T-90S MBTs and T-90SK command post for tank battalion unit. With the purchase of T-90S MBTs, the Iraqi armed forces will increase the fire power of its tank battalions with latest generation of Russian-made main battle tanks.

The T-90S is an enhanced version of the Russian-made T-90 Main Battle Tank (MBT) to meet the operational requirements of countries in Asia. The T-90S is used by India under the name of Bhishma. The T-90S is the latest development in the T-series of Russian tanks and represents an increase in firepower, mobility and protection. It is manufactured by the Russian Company Uralvagonzavod based in Nizhnyi Tagil.

Main armament of the T-90S includes one 125 mm 2A46M smoothbore gun, stabilized in two axes and fitted with a thermal sleeve. It can also fire a 9M119M laser guided projectile fitted with a tandem HEAT (High Explosive Anti-Tank) warhead out to a maximum range of 5,000 m. A 7.62 mm 6P7K machine gun is mounted coaxial with the main armament and a 12.7 mm 6P49 machine gun is mounted on the turret roof and can be laid and fired from within the turret.

The latest version of the T-90S MBT features an air conditioning system for operations in high ambient temperatures. A French Thales Optronics second-generation thermal camera has been installed with the commander and gunner both being provided with a screen. The day/night sighting system is called the ESSA (thermal vision and sighting system) and has been developed by Thales, Uralvagonzavod and the Peleng Joint Stock Company of the Belarus.

Read more: https://www.armyrecognition.com/february_2018_global_defense_security_army_news_industry/russia_has_started_the_delivery_of_t-90s_mbt_tanks_to_iraq.html



Now we know why Trump didn't enforce sanctions against countries importing Russian weapons. In this case, paid for by you and me https://www.nationalpriorities.org/campaigns/overseas-contingency-operations/
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

MGKrebs

(8,138 posts)
2. It's that T14 you have to worry about.
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 05:07 PM
Feb 2018

Fires missiles and shells, auto-loading, active countermeasures. 3 crew and none in the turret so it can be smaller, lighter and faster.

Aristus

(66,380 posts)
8. Missiles fired from a tank gun have been so unsuccessful that most Western nations have dropped
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 06:25 PM
Feb 2018

them from their inventory. TOW-style missiles aren't 'fire-and-forget' like a standard tank round. The gunner has to keep his eye and the reticle on the target until the missile detonates. That can significantly reduce a tank's shoot and scoot capability.

Russia has pretty much ironed out the problems that plagued the auto-loader initially used on the T-64 and early-model T-72's. So that's an advantage. But a reduced crew still means increased crew fatigue in combat operations and in maintenance. Plus, an auto-loader is very difficult to reload from the crew stations on the tank. So reloading during combat operations is a very dicy proposition.

And of course, training and proficiency will always be a factor in head-to-head combat. And while Russian tank-crew training is better than it used to be, it still trails the US.

Former M1A1 tanker here...

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
14. i wouldn't hold my breath and bet they've really ironed out the auto-loader issues they've had
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 08:05 PM
Feb 2018

for 50 years. They're also going to have to build more than a handful of those tanks.

 

Kristofer Bry

(175 posts)
3. Thanks, George W Bush!
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 05:12 PM
Feb 2018

Iraq used to be stable, albeit a dictatorship. Today it's shattered, up for grabs, and still not free.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,344 posts)
6. I think those are two phases of the same war, with a smaller phase
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 05:44 PM
Feb 2018

of no-fly-zone enforcement between them.

But, we've been bombing continuously since 1991.

 

NCDem777

(458 posts)
10. They had more than a decade
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 01:18 AM
Feb 2018

to get their shit together. On our dime. They decided religious bullshit was more important.

If they can't stand on their own, they deserve to fall.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
15. Spoken by someone who doesn't quite grasp the concepts of consequences.
Mon Feb 5, 2018, 11:58 AM
Feb 2018

"If they can't stand on their own, they deserve to fall..."

Spoken by someone who doesn't quite grasp the concepts of consequences.

xor

(1,204 posts)
12. I'm don't think this suggests they are going to be under Russia's thumb
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 05:19 PM
Feb 2018

Those T-90 tanks are probably cheaper to maintain and run than the American made Abrams. I would think that probably was a major consideration in what made them purchase these tanks.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
13. That as well as an increased unwillingness of the U.S. to sell the M-1 Abrams to Iraq
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 07:47 PM
Feb 2018

Soviet/Russian military equipment is designed for army conscripts (2 year terms of enlistment, including basic training) to be able to do basic maintenance and the simpler repairs with major repairs being done behind the lines by more skilled personnel;.

The US Army, the longer enlistment terms (8 years total, the number of active duty years depends on a number of variables, but is at least 2 years NOT including basic/military specialty training) allows for better trained soldiers.

Since it is unlikely that the Iraqi Army (regardless of it's official name) has the time, money or experience to train their religiously divided army, it makes more sense for them to buy Russian equipment.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Russia has started the de...