Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,964 posts)
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 09:33 PM Feb 2018

U.S. Supreme Court rejects challenge to EPA water regulation

Source: Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned away a challenge led by states and environmental groups to an Environmental Protection Agency regulation that lets government agencies transfer water between different bodies, such as rivers and lakes, without needing to protect against pollution.

The nine justices left in place a lower court ruling upholding the EPA’s “water transfers rule,” issued in 2008 by Republican former President George W. Bush’s administration, that exempted such transfers from a national water discharge program aimed at curbing pollution.

Under the landmark Clean Water Act, permits are required for the “discharge of any pollutant” into “navigable waters.” Opponents of the EPA rule said water transfers can pollute otherwise pristine water bodies and should require permits.

The New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year ruled that the EPA had acted reasonably in 2008 in adopting the rule over the objections of environmental groups.

-snip-

ENVIRONMENT FEBRUARY 26, 2018 / 9:40 AM / UPDATED 10 HOURS AGO
Lawrence Hurley
3 MIN READ


Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-water/u-s-supreme-court-rejects-challenge-to-epa-water-regulation-idUSKCN1GA1V4

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Supreme Court rejects challenge to EPA water regulation (Original Post) Eugene Feb 2018 OP
Not good. First blow against the environment by the R court. Fred Sanders Feb 2018 #1
Yes, too bad Reuters' headline makes is sound as if SCOTUS was rejecting a challenge enough Feb 2018 #2
Well, Reuters is a premiere news aggregator and only hire the best headline writers. Fred Sanders Feb 2018 #3

enough

(13,262 posts)
2. Yes, too bad Reuters' headline makes is sound as if SCOTUS was rejecting a challenge
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 09:49 PM
Feb 2018

to environmental protection.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. Supreme Court reject...