doesn't seem like going to a friends wedding should be paid for by taxpayers.

Trump's kids are pretty excessive in their travel. But, nobody complained much about protection for Obama's daughters, or GWB's daughters, or for Chelsea Clinton.

So, until we vote these bums out, ...

We cannot pick and choose based on our dislike of the persons.

Many, many posts on this site decried the right when they complained about security costs for the Obama kids when they were on spring break. We cannot believe it is okay for Obama's children to have security and then turn around and say it isn't okay for 45's.

Aren't these two adult daddy boys rich enough to afford their own security? I resent Obama's young children, the oldest of whom was barely entering adulthood when he left office, being compared to them.

In no way did I compare the two sets of children. There is absolutely no way to compare them.

What I proposed was fair and equal treatment for everyone. Regardless of how we feel about them personally.

I know people don't like it, but it is the established law and way of doing things. Obama's kids took spring break trips to the Caribbean and the right-wing went bonkers over the cost. People on this site called the right out for being unfair. They made the argument that they were, as children of the sitting President, entitled to security.

We cannot turn around and make the opposite argument now, just because a Republican is in office and we despise his children. That is called FUCKING HYPOCRISY. I am not a hypocrite and don't plan to become one.

I don't see how we can call ourselves the equality, fair, progressive, liberal party and not apply the rules equally.

ON EDIT: If I wanted to be a hypocrite, judge people for attributes about them like party, parents, race, religion, etc. and then treat them differently and poorly because of those attributes I'd become a Republican. But I'm not.

How much to make them stay? I'm in for a portion.

So much for journalism skoolin'