ALL of the above!!!!!!

Pre Obama America would probably not support so many obvious traitors, but the black president drew a line that was invisible before, it was there but invisible, so to speak.

Now there is NOTHING they wont support as long as it is racist, misogynist, homophobic, etc.

Nothing.

Obama being elected and then a smart, non nonsense woman wanting to be next? Fuck , that was way too much for deplorables or what is really about SIXTY MILLION Americans who VOTE.

US intel had been looking Russia/Trump connections long before 2016.

Hey - cut the rube some slack. He (like many of our reps) has an addiction problem. He's addicted to the money from "BIG Farm-ah". Corporate interests fuel this Bozo, but he IS in trouble out here. I live out amongst farm fields and his 3'X5' campaign signs keep mysteriously disappearing or ending up on the ground with tire tracks on them. And I'm not the cause!
We laughed at the irony of Nunes being tapped for the "intelligence" committee. Talk about an oxymoran!!! I do believe he'll be but one grain of sand against the blue wave.

Thanks for the encouraging report.

ROUBLES

even if they prove their paranoid thesis.

Who needs life in prison not top secret info.

Go for it, nunes!!! Gonna look great for donnie's picks to get impeached.

This is the third major blunder he's made in the name of Trump.

in season one of True Detective ...

His head is so far up his Trump that...

...who wants to punch this fucking little twerp in the nose? Just inquiring.

nt

Is somebody missing all the action? Not being a good Lassie, for his Timmy.
Someone might be begging for a

No Knock
No Knock
No Knock

Who's there?

America.

Please donate:

https://www.andrewjanzforcongress.com/

Thanks for the link

I really want to see this jerk Nunes, brought into a federal court, for obstruction of justice, and the best way to do this is to vote him out, and then brought in to explain his BS and watch him lie...............and it would be to funny if he had to go before Janz..................



November 2018 cannot get here fast enough

for relevance.

hold the House together for impeachment, the Senate will never convict.

He's that stupid. I have little doubt that he's in the Russia stuff up to his eyeballs. He's as dumb as Spanky, and he likely thinks that eliminating the investigators will make everything go away. I wouldn't be surprised if he caught wind of a pending raid on his offices.

Come November, it will be his time in the barrel.

"...we will have a plan to hold in contempt and to impeach..."

A plan, you say! Well, good luck with that, buttercup.

Think you can even get a majority on your committee to vote to hold in contempt the (new) director of the FBI and the Deputy Attorney General?
Think you can even get a majority on your committee to vote to move it to the House floor?
Think you can even get a simple majority of the House to vote on something this explosive? (Tell me again how many R's are not running for re-election...?)
Think you can even get two-freaking-thirds of the Senate to vote to convict?
Can you imagine the witnesses the director of the FBI and the Deputy Attorney General will call in defense and the damage they can do to you?

Not very bright, are 'ya?

have to withhold this from him. It doesn't seem like either agency has given some specific reason why they can't or won't turn it over.

and Nunes may be a subject of their investigations

My concern (in general) is that it's not good when agencies that are supposed to have oversight are told they can't have information they request without a clear explanation. That's how the inmates end up running the asylum.

But do not forget Nunes recused himself,lied about that, sneaked in the WH to share news.
Closed down the investigation, then wrote 2 lying memos.

Decent Republicans are not going to put their necks on the line for Nunes.

I think it's a problem when an agency doesn't comply with it's oversight and doesn't explain why it won't or can't. I don't trust Nunes, but as long as he's in that position, they need to either comply or explain why, don't they? We shouldn't need to speculate about this, it only feeds into the idea that there is a "deep state" that controls things and they don't answer to elected officials. That idea fosters distrust in government and is a rallying point for republican voters.

And then they can either order the unredacted version be given to Nunes, or explain to Nunes ... why it is that it cannot be.

To be clear, Nunes HAS seen a redacted version, it's not like they've completely withheld the requested document.

It's not that Nunes, personally, can't see it (although if there's a good reason for that, it should be addressed) it's that they're withholding it from the entire oversight committee seemingly without a clear explanation.

cut him off like that.

Trump so that such a move would constitute Obstruction of Justice with Mueller's probe. Nunes sure seems to be in league with Trump the way he would run to the WH late at night.

Due to Nunes ties to Trump, DOJ and FBI might be able to make the case that Nunes' actions are intended to interfere with an ongoing investigation an Nunes cannot be trusted to keep his mouth shut about anything he could learn from the.

is it within their power to simply not cooperate? I don't believe it is. It's reached the point where if they have a problem with Nunes getting this information, they need to either say so or cooperate. This is exactly the sort of thing that gives all those people who talk about corruption and "the swamp" reason to believe it's true.

enterprise should they go ahead and turn over whatever material that is requested?

why is that person not being charged with being part of an ongoing criminal enterprise?

they have already produced a redacted version.

as far as I know, the FBI and DOJ have neither turned it over or explained why they won't or can't.

... with their belief that Nunes cannot be trusted not to reveal investigative secrets/strategies to the targets and subjects of the ongoing investigation - which is clearly why he wants the documents in the first place. It's entirely possible that the initial trigger for the investigation summarizes wire-taps, identifies whistleblowers and sets out road maps following the $ ... and who knows what else. Nunes getting his hands on it could be very detrimental to the investigation - especially if he gets it and spills it before Trump is interviewed.

But it's a little awkward, I guess, to publicly tell a US Congressman that he's a leak-weasel and not trust-worthy enough to be given sensitive information.

to withhold documents from oversight on the grounds that they "don't trust him". Otherwise, there's little incentive for organizations to comply with oversight at all.