Trump nominates former official who refused to sue Trump University to federal court
Source: The Hill
BY MORGAN GSTALTER - 04/11/18 09:10 AM EDT
President Trump nominated a former deputy Texas attorney general who decided not to sue Trump University to fill a federal judge vacancy.
Trump nominated David S. Morales to fill a vacant seat on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the Corpus Christi Caller-Times reported Wednesday.
While serving as deputy attorney general, Morales declined to pursue a $5.4 million lawsuit against Trump and Trump University.
He worked with then-Attorney General Greg Abbott (R), who is now the states governor. Morales said in a 2016 statement that he would not to pursue the lawsuit and did not discuss his decision with Abbott.
Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/382612-trump-nominates-former-deputy-texas-ag-who-refused-to-sue-trump
Corgigal
(9,291 posts)We're gonna have to write a new law, any president impeached or criminally charge, will have all his political appointees re-approved.
onenote
(42,703 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(57,450 posts)That would require an amendment of the Constitution.
Constitutional provision
Main article: Appointments Clause
The term "advice and consent" first appears in the United States Constitution in Article II, Section 2, Clause 2, referring to the senate's role in the signing and ratification of treaties. This term is then used again, to describe the Senate's role in the appointment of public officials, immediately after describing the president's duty to nominate officials. Article II, Section 2, paragraph 2 of the United States Constitution states:
{The President} shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
This language was written at the Constitutional Convention as part of a delicate compromise concerning the balance of power in the federal government. Many delegates preferred to develop a strong executive control vested in the president, while others, worried about authoritarian control, preferred to strengthen the Congress. Requiring the president to gain the advice and consent of the Senate achieved both goals without hindering the business of government.
Under the Twenty-fifth Amendment, appointments to the office of Vice President are confirmed by a majority vote in both Houses of Congress, instead of just the Senate.
The Appointments Clause is part of Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution, which empowers the President of the United States to nominate, and with the advice and consent (confirmation) of the United States Senate, appoint public officials. Although the Senate must confirm certain "principal" officers (including ambassadors, Cabinet secretaries, federal judges, and United States Attorneys), Congress may by law delegate the Senate's advice and consent role when it comes to "inferior" officers (to the President alone, or the courts of law, or the heads of departments).
ananda
(28,860 posts)nt
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)Morales did not know that!
riversedge
(70,221 posts)from the now successful lawsuit against Trump.
HopeAgain
(4,407 posts)Bautista or peron would be proud.
turbinetree
(24,701 posts)under the Advise and Consent "Rule of Law", I don't think so, but we already know that you don't think to much of the Constitution do ya Mitch, its just a fucking piece of toilet paper
November 2018 cannot get here fast enough