Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed Apr 11, 2018, 09:34 AM Apr 2018

Trump nominates former official who refused to sue Trump University to federal court

Source: The Hill




BY MORGAN GSTALTER - 04/11/18 09:10 AM EDT

President Trump nominated a former deputy Texas attorney general who decided not to sue Trump University to fill a federal judge vacancy.

Trump nominated David S. Morales to fill a vacant seat on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the Corpus Christi Caller-Times reported Wednesday.

While serving as deputy attorney general, Morales declined to pursue a $5.4 million lawsuit against Trump and Trump University.

He worked with then-Attorney General Greg Abbott (R), who is now the state’s governor. Morales said in a 2016 statement that he would not to pursue the lawsuit and did not discuss his decision with Abbott.



Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/382612-trump-nominates-former-deputy-texas-ag-who-refused-to-sue-trump

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump nominates former official who refused to sue Trump University to federal court (Original Post) DonViejo Apr 2018 OP
When we get congress Corgigal Apr 2018 #1
Such a law would be vetoed. By any president. onenote Apr 2018 #2
Advice and consent, Constitutional provision mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2018 #4
It would be nice and that's the way it should be. ananda Apr 2018 #9
Abbott still took the $35,000 Trump donation and I dont believe for a second that Dustlawyer Apr 2018 #3
I think there were 2 states that did not sue, and therefore the students got NOTHING back riversedge Apr 2018 #5
We are officially a banana republic HopeAgain Apr 2018 #6
Hey McConnell are you still with the fucking crime family or the Constitution turbinetree Apr 2018 #7
Not a scintilla of conflict or 'payoff'. marble falls Apr 2018 #8

Corgigal

(9,291 posts)
1. When we get congress
Wed Apr 11, 2018, 09:36 AM
Apr 2018

We're gonna have to write a new law, any president impeached or criminally charge, will have all his political appointees re-approved.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,450 posts)
4. Advice and consent, Constitutional provision
Wed Apr 11, 2018, 09:42 AM
Apr 2018

That would require an amendment of the Constitution.

Advice and consent, Constitutional provision

Constitutional provision

Main article: Appointments Clause

The term "advice and consent" first appears in the United States Constitution in Article II, Section 2, Clause 2, referring to the senate's role in the signing and ratification of treaties. This term is then used again, to describe the Senate's role in the appointment of public officials, immediately after describing the president's duty to nominate officials. Article II, Section 2, paragraph 2 of the United States Constitution states:

{The President} shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

This language was written at the Constitutional Convention as part of a delicate compromise concerning the balance of power in the federal government. Many delegates preferred to develop a strong executive control vested in the president, while others, worried about authoritarian control, preferred to strengthen the Congress. Requiring the president to gain the advice and consent of the Senate achieved both goals without hindering the business of government.

Under the Twenty-fifth Amendment, appointments to the office of Vice President are confirmed by a majority vote in both Houses of Congress, instead of just the Senate.

Appointments Clause

The Appointments Clause is part of Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution, which empowers the President of the United States to nominate, and with the advice and consent (confirmation) of the United States Senate, appoint public officials. Although the Senate must confirm certain "principal" officers (including ambassadors, Cabinet secretaries, federal judges, and United States Attorneys), Congress may by law delegate the Senate's advice and consent role when it comes to "inferior" officers (to the President alone, or the courts of law, or the heads of departments).

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
3. Abbott still took the $35,000 Trump donation and I dont believe for a second that
Wed Apr 11, 2018, 09:39 AM
Apr 2018

Morales did not know that!

riversedge

(70,221 posts)
5. I think there were 2 states that did not sue, and therefore the students got NOTHING back
Wed Apr 11, 2018, 09:42 AM
Apr 2018

from the now successful lawsuit against Trump.

turbinetree

(24,701 posts)
7. Hey McConnell are you still with the fucking crime family or the Constitution
Wed Apr 11, 2018, 09:49 AM
Apr 2018

under the Advise and Consent "Rule of Law", I don't think so, but we already know that you don't think to much of the Constitution do ya Mitch, its just a fucking piece of toilet paper




November 2018 cannot get here fast enough

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump nominates former of...