Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

louis c

(8,652 posts)
Tue Apr 17, 2018, 10:49 AM Apr 2018

SCOTUS Nixes Part of Law Requiring Deportation of Some Immigrants Convicted of Crimes

Source: CNN

(CNN) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday invalidated a provision of federal law that requires the mandatory deportation of immigrants who have been convicted of some crimes, holding that the law is unconstitutionally vague.

The case, Sessions v. Dimaya, had been closely watched to see if the justices would reveal how they will consider the Trump administration's overall push to both limit immigration and increase deportations.

As expected after the oral argument, Justice Neil Gorsuch joined with the more liberal justices for the first time since joining the court to produce a 5-4 majority invalidating the federal statute. In doing so, Gorsuch was continuing the jurisprudence of Justice Antonin Scalia, who also sided with liberals when it came to the vagueness of statutes used to convict criminal defendants.

Only eight justices heard the case last term after Scalia's death, and in late June, the court announced it would re-hear arguments this term, presumably so that Gorsuch could break some kind of a tie.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/17/politics/supreme-court-federal-law-deportation-immigrants/index.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS Nixes Part of Law Requiring Deportation of Some Immigrants Convicted of Crimes (Original Post) louis c Apr 2018 OP
what about all those poor immigrants already deported for decades old violations... hlthe2b Apr 2018 #1
Gorsuch casts his first vote with the liberals in a 5 - 4 decision, following Scalia's footsteps mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2018 #2
Trump will be fuming NewJeffCT Apr 2018 #3
Yeah, he did. mountain grammy Apr 2018 #4
Twitter Tirade About "So-Called Judge" In 5... 4... 3... nt smb Apr 2018 #5
Good news, but.. BobTheSubgenius Apr 2018 #6

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,512 posts)
2. Gorsuch casts his first vote with the liberals in a 5 - 4 decision, following Scalia's footsteps
Tue Apr 17, 2018, 10:53 AM
Apr 2018

You beat me to it.

Retweeted by TheNewNormalHat: https://twitter.com/Popehat

Obviously the Supreme Court is political, but often people talk about it as purely political, with judges simply reflecting their own policy preferences or those of their nominators, which overstates the case.



And there it is: Gorsuch casts his first vote with the liberals in a 5–4 decision, following Scalia's footsteps in striking down an unconstitutionally vague provision of a deportation statute. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/15-1498_1b8e.pdf



For those keeping score at home, Alito has never cast the fifth vote with the liberals a 5–4 opinion. I expect Gorsuch will do so at least once more this term, in Carpenter.



Sessions v. Dimaya

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
3. Trump will be fuming
Tue Apr 17, 2018, 10:57 AM
Apr 2018

didn't he almost take back Gorusch's nomination until he was told that SCOTUS judges can't be required to make loyalty oaths to the president?

BobTheSubgenius

(11,564 posts)
6. Good news, but..
Tue Apr 17, 2018, 12:48 PM
Apr 2018

...it doesn't exactly leave me feeling sanguine about the future of immigration law, but most especially, the future of SCOTUS.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»SCOTUS Nixes Part of Law ...