Senate GOP wary of new tax cut sequel
Source: The Hill
BY ALEXANDER BOLTON - 04/18/18 06:00 AM EDT
New projections on the size of the federal deficit and the price tag of President Trumps tax-cut law have left some Republican senators nervous about voting on another tax package before the election.
While the GOP on Tuesday used Tax Day to proclaim the success of last years $1.5 trillion tax cut, there is some unease about doubling down on the issue in the coming months. Some in the party want to go on offense and try to make permanent the individual tax cuts that were part of last years legislation. The bills authors sunset those provisions to keep the measures total projected cost below $1.5 trillion.
Id say, Hell no. Hell no double hell no, retiring Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), a leading budget hawk, told The Hill when asked about making the individual tax breaks permanent. Corker supported the bill, but last week citing the deficit said it could be one of the worst votes Ive made.
Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.), who has also raised alarm about the growing debt, said he has concerns about making the individual tax breaks permanent. He added his first reaction is to support a long-term tax cut for individuals but cautioned it needs to be examined more closely.
He wants to see whether granting permanent tax breaks for individuals would stimulate the economy as much as the permanent corporate tax cut.
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/383663-senate-gop-wary-of-new-tax-cut-sequel?userid=57999
forgotmylogin
(7,528 posts)I'm all for a new tax code written with bipartisan support carefully the way it should be done, and not passed with scribbled notes in the margin at 1 AM.
It'll probably take longer than the end of 2018 at least, by which time the Rs will have less power and the Ds can do a better job. That's probably why there's this push to seal this awful code under glass RIGHT NOW in the first place.
not fooled
(5,801 posts)about revenues rising because of the magic tax scam?
Of course not. Corker isn't that stupid. Now he has to feign surprise that they are wrecking the country. For most of us. Of course he only cares about the wealthy who are partying on their extra money stolen from all of us.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)say about this? The Republican caucuses haven't been committing possible political suicide because they wanted to. They were told to come through with what they were put in office to produce, or be replaced.
Notably, even though the skilled congressional leaders may be hard to replace, the big donors were obviously willing to take their booty while they could and refill their seats with new agents after.
Now, especially with all these retirements leaving the Republican "bench" mostly empty of skilled leader material anyway, so that it would mostly endanger relatively easily replaced order-followers, I'm really wondering if the bastards won't turn the screws again while they can.