WY District Votes To Arm Teachers From Bears After DeVos Suggestion To Do So
Source: Talking Points Memo/AP
By Mead Gruver | April 18, 2018 10:43 am
CHEYENNE, Wyo. (AP) The Wyoming school district where U.S. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos suggested that teachers might need to be armed to protect children from grizzly bears voted Tuesday on doing just that, though concerns about school shootings worry parents more than the possibility of big bruins on the prowl.
The 4-2 vote by the Park County School District No. 6 board in the town of Cody near Yellowstone National Park came after more than six months of discussion and debate. Under the proposed policy, school employees would need to have at least 24 hours of initial firearms training and annual recertification to carry concealed guns at school.
Unfortunately we have people in our country who want to cause harm to students and at some point you have to respond to that threat. And thats what this board decided to do with the policy they adopted, said Superintendent Ray Schulte. The policy was up for a final vote after passing two earlier votes 5-2.
Nationwide, some districts are discussing arming teachers not with guns but buckets of rocks (Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania) and tiny baseball bats (Erie, Pennsylvania). But in some rural areas including much of Texas, school officials have been quietly arming teachers for years.
Read more: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/wyoming-school-district-vote-arm-teachers
Toorich
(391 posts)and who's going to pay for them?
mpcamb
(2,870 posts)Who else would follow advice from Betsy DeVos?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)130,000 schools in this nation, and these people are especially worried it'll happen there?
Maybe they have more nuts in rural Colorado? CO does border the "redoubt" region that's drawn a bunch of heavily armed suspicious people who most would prefer didn't live nearby. Vote with your feet, too late for MAGA" types.
Some old friends from the Santa Monica area, moderately conservative empty nesters, have been discussing this. He wants to move to rural eastern Idaho because he loves the area itself. But when they visited to check out prospective homes, she discovered just what was over the hill or down the road and said a big no.
SWBTATTReg
(22,124 posts)They hibernate during the winter months (most part) and thus no danger.
Already police and forest park services available to deal w/, in most areas, so why not hire a couple of more personal to handle bear calls (I can't help but laugh almost here)?
I would think possibility of wild or feral dogs would be a greater danger than bears but I may be wrong.
In the southern Ozarks we dealt w/ possibility of coming up against black bears in our walks through the forests, and basically carried whistles to blow if need be to scare off, or just make a lot of noise if a bear was encountered.
They also even manufacture a 'bear spray' that you could spray (a kind of tear gas I think) for those who walk in the woods to carry if so desired.
In another instance, my Mom was on her daily walk behind a Missouri state park and encountered an EMU of all things...it ran off, but you would not think this would happen (probably got out of its enclosure, EMUs are farmed/raised for meat in parts of MO).
This proposal seems way overboard and reeks of nonsense logic. Bears (at least the black bears) are more scared of us and we very rarely heard them (they usually were gone long before you could see them)...
Initech
(100,076 posts)marble falls
(57,083 posts)jmowreader
(50,557 posts)It's more than obvious Betsy DeVos doesn't know anything about killing bears.
News flash: shooting a big bear with a pistol will probably do nothing more than piss it off...and it's surprising just how many elementary students a pissed-off grizzly bear can eat at one sitting.