Trump wants negotiations with California on auto gas mileage
Source: Associated Press
By TOM KRISHER and KEN THOMAS
Today
WASHINGTON (AP) Addressing a key concern for manufacturers, President Donald Trump has instructed his administration to explore negotiations with California on achieving a single fuel economy standard for the nation during a meeting with auto industry executives.
The president met with top auto executives Friday to discuss the standards and tasked Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt to handle the talks with California officials, according to two people briefed on the meeting. The people spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the private discussions.
The auto industry wants to relax the federal fuel economy standards, but not so much that they provoke a legal fight with California, which has power to impose its own stricter tailpipe pollution limits. Such a fight could create two different mileage standards in the U.S., forcing automakers to engineer and produce two versions of each of their vehicle models and driving up costs.
A Trump administration official said the two agencies have had meetings and discussions with California officials on the issue for several months.
Read more: https://apnews.com/4d0ad86a90754883a5b8eee9ed3772b4/Trump-wants-negotiations-with-California-on-auto-gas-mileage
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)Signed, California.
theaocp
(4,237 posts)denbot
(9,899 posts)Fuck him!
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)With the VERY FIRST post. I love it!
gay texan
(2,448 posts)and Mr. Trump is the customer of the day....
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,491 posts)Link: https://www.axios.com/republicans-are-nearly-outnumbered-by-independents-in-california-3b050277-8c37-4fcc-a2bc-dc327cb1d012.html
Rob Stutzman, a longtime GOP strategist
Lucky you. At least the bastards are going extinct in some parts of the USA.......
We're a little behind on the evolutionary curve here in KY, LOL
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,586 posts)Just do it our way.
Love,
California
NickB79
(19,243 posts)The middle being exactly what they were under Obama 😀
RKP5637
(67,108 posts)SCVDem
(5,103 posts)The smog was so bad at times the sun was a large orange ball.
AH HA!!!!!
Stay out of my state you orange asshole!
SunSeeker
(51,557 posts)I was just a kid but I remember it clearly because I became ill breathing that garbage.
lapfog_1
(29,204 posts)We do not need to return to those days.
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)DBoon
(22,366 posts)Mountains just 3 miles away were invisible
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)We drive "affordable" vehicles in Alabama that would FAIL standards in any big city and California!
But things work themselves out - the price of gas can go so high they'll all be parked.
Gore1FL
(21,132 posts)It always amazes me how much money the U.S. auto industry spends in order to be allowed to produce a non-competitive inferior products in a global market.
Yavin4
(35,438 posts)This is why we lost the once dominant auto industry to foreign competition.
displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)So fuck off, President Half Day. I live in California now and love the fresh air. It's really nice being able to trust my lawmakers! Not many state residents can say that honestly.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)By Ozone:
#1: Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA
#2: Bakersfield, CA
#3: Visalia-Porterville-Hanford, CA
#4: Fresno-Madera, CA
#5: Sacramento-Roseville, CA
#6: San Diego-Carlsbad, CA
#7: Modesto-Merced, CA
#8: Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ
#9: Redding-Red Bluff, CA
#10: New York-Newark, NY-NJ-CT-PA
By Particle Pollution
#1: Fairbanks, AK
#2: Visalia-Porterville-Hanford, CA
#3: Bakersfield, CA
#4: Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA
#5: Fresno-Madera, CA
#6: Modesto-Merced, CA
#7: El Centro, CA
#8: Pittsburgh-New Castle-Weirton, PA-OH-WV
#8: Lancaster, PA
#10: Cleveland-Akron-Canton, OH
displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)The air is delightful, especially when the blooms in GG Park make it smell like perfume in my neighborhood.
Igel
(35,309 posts)Best not to confuse "we keep our air clean" with "onshore flow typically flushes our crap into the neighboring county."
Eugene was great. But every once in a while an inversion layer would trap the pollution from the 150k people who lived there in the valley and it wouldn't be nice.
(Or worse, it would trap the fog in and Skinner's Butte would be sunny up top but the entire city below would be in pea-soup-thick fog.)
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)Just produce a single version to the stricter California standards and your problem will be solved.
fleabiscuit
(4,542 posts)winstars
(4,220 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)David Frum tweet: ? "Regular reminder that Donald Trumps core competency is not dealmaking with powerful counter-parties. It is duping gullible victims."
procon
(15,805 posts)of each of their vehicles. No, they won't, because California is such a huge and profitable market they can set the pace for car makers. Automakers would rather sell expense cars like the types of vehicles that sell in California, so that's going to be the bulk of the models they will produce for every other state.
SunSeeker
(51,557 posts)And being able to breath.
MichMan
(11,929 posts)Because customers walk past the fuel efficient vehicles in the showrooms to buy something else?
That is the issue here. You can build all the fuel efficient vehicles you want, but unless people buy them you don't get credit for it against your fleet average.
Car salesperson: " Would you like to see the new Chevy Bolt? It's our newest electric car and we have several on the lot if you would like a test drive. I have one and I really love the way it performs"
Customer: " Not interested, I want to buy an all wheel drive Traverse. A guy at work has one and I really like it "
Salesperson: "The Traverse is one of our best selling models. We can hardly keep them on the lot"
DU "GM failed to meet the CAFE requirements. Don't they know people want fuel efficient cars? They should be taught a lesson & fined tens of millions for acting so irresponsibly ! "
SunSeeker
(51,557 posts)They made huge strides under Obama with their fuel -efficient/hybrids competing with foreign ones. But it took work and R&D investment---that would not happen without the threat of fines.
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)More than elsewhere based on what I have seen when I traveled.
DBoon
(22,366 posts)It is seriously one of the most common cars on the road.
And a Tesla is a true status item.
still_one
(92,190 posts)MichMan
(11,929 posts)Politicians love cheap gas prices, but don't want people using much.
Consumers see cheap gas prices and don't make fuel economy a priority.
Auto manufacturers are caught right in the middle between these factors and CAFE
One method to get consumers to avoid vehicles with less than desirable fuel economy would be to make them financially un appealing. Higher gas taxes or registration fees would do that.
Voters would scream bloody murder, so no politician will ever propose a solution like that. Easier to blame the auto companies.
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)the summer.
The refineries shut down and change the mix when the season changes.
That's because the wind blows ocean air -- fresh, moist air in from the west. Miles to the East are the Sierras, the mountain range. That moist air becomes trapped by the mountains. The soot and pollution hovers against the mountain ranges and backs up into the cities where Californians drive far too many cars.
Our public transportation system in the Los Angeles area is horrible compared to cities like D.C. or New York or Chicago.
If you want to know why, watch the film Who Killed Roger Rabbit.
Anyway, we not only drive cars with lower gas mileage in general, but we get a special mix of summer gas every year.
Trump, Pruitt and the Koch Brothers should keep their noses out of California. They don't understand our rather unusual problems.
The Prius and other such low-emission cars are popular here. We are moving toward more and more solar panels. That is what works best in our pollution-prone geography.
SunSeeker
(51,557 posts)The pollution has nowhere to go when winds blow from the ocean.
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,491 posts)to a supplier in Redondo Beach. Our host (a CA native) told us there is a clean air band from the ocean to a certain distance inland, and that land prices were something on the order of 10X what they might be just a ways further in.
Don't recall how wide that band was but I do remember thinking what a shame that the wealthy could buy their way to a healthier environment.
........
SunSeeker
(51,557 posts)Where they live, they've got clear air. They don't want to spend money making it clean for us peons living on the east side of the 405 Freeway (the old clean air border) in the L.A. basin.
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,491 posts)Same with security. Most all wealthy people stay in gated communities and some with private security. Or, cops give their areas high priority. After they live that way for a while (say, the ones that climbed the ladder of success), they lose sensitivity to common working people's needs. That's one reason they resent progressive taxation.
More reasons to demolish extreme levels of economic inequality and skewed asset distribution in existence world-wide today.
Thanks for the reply!......
OnDoutside
(19,956 posts)Donnie getting for that ?
DBoon
(22,366 posts)That is the typical situation for a president to negotiate with another political entity
As in Kennedy negotiating with Krushchev
thegoose
(3,115 posts)For the world-destroying Pukes who have been around for decades. Fuck them all and their immoral spawn.
Raine
(30,540 posts)our elected leaders run the state as a separate country!
Yavin4
(35,438 posts)Can you imagine Apple saying, let's roll back innovation to create more profits?