from this move, along with the U.S. unilateral withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal, will destabilize the entire region, and move the entire region closer to all out war.

The Democrats position needs to be to get the parties back to the negotiating table, and that is where these issues need to be discussed, but with the current administration, and the same architects of the Iraq invasion by the U.S. now in charge of mideast policy, that is very unlikely to occur

destabilized the entire region, and motivated Iran to accelerate its nuclear ambitions.

Once Iraq fell, the Shia majority essentially led the newly formed government, and you might notice that the anti-U.S. cleric, Sadr, is now making waves.

Another fact largely ignored was under bush administration, they called for elections in the Palestinian territories, when events there were not conducive to one, and it resulted in the election of the Hamas leadership:

https://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/30/world/middleeast/rice-admits-us-underestimated-hamas-strength.html

The U.S. has made one blunder after another in the middle east, and I suspect that will continue for the foreseeable future.

Rabin and Sadat are dead, and unfortunately, so are any prospects for peace

Ironically, both Rabin and Sadat were murdered by extremists from both sides

I am no historian by any stretch of the imagination, but the whole thing from at least the British on has been one big screw up.

Israel and Iran becoming one big total disaster if things are not cooled down. The poor Kurds would have to run for the hills. Could also further destabilize Turkey and Jordon.....

Things were bad enough even with our very best diplomacy from John Kerry and his excellent crew.

And it was passed overwhelmingly by both houses.

GD Trump.

Drumpfenfuhrer is gettin' his kills--bone spurs or no bone spurs!