Congress OKs letting terminal patients try unapproved drugs
Source: Associated Press
Congress OKs letting terminal patients try unapproved drugs
Supporters of the measure argued that people had a right to try experimental procedures, while critics said giving people access to untested drugs was dangerous.
by Associated Press / May.22.2018 / 6:57 PM ET
WASHINGTON A bill helping people with deadly diseases try experimental treatments sailed through Congress on Tuesday, a victory for President Donald Trump and foes of regulation and a defeat for patients' groups and Democrats who argued that the measure was dangerous and dangled false hope.
After an emotional debate, the House gave the legislation final congressional approval by a largely party-line vote of 250-169, nine months after it passed the Senate.
Republicans argued that the measure would help hundreds of thousands of people, patients "desperately seeking a beacon of hope," said House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Greg Walden, R-Ore.
"Why do you not want to allow these patients to exercise their right to fight for their future?" Rep. Michael Burgess, R-Texas, who chairs that panel's health subcommittee, asked Democrats.
Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/congress-oks-letting-terminal-patients-try-unapproved-drugs-n876606
Archae
(46,327 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)If terminal patients want to try unapproved treatments, that's certainly up to them.
The people selling them such things are another matter.
bucolic_frolic
(43,161 posts)I'm all for alternative medicine. Doctors don't always have it all figured out. But fighting and hope are not medicine. This will lead to quackery and dead patients, some of them sooner or with poorer outcomes than placebos or mainstream treatments.
Turbineguy
(37,331 posts)Encourage them to kill themselves.
Besides, if you get sick it's because God hates you. Neener, neener. So there.
packman
(16,296 posts)I would let them try it. Can't understand the opposition to such an approach. If I was deemed terminal and there was the slightest chance a drug would save me and possibly save others, I would welcome it.
Lucky Luciano
(11,256 posts)As it stands, it is better when big exceptions are needed because then the standard is still high.
dembotoz
(16,804 posts)and not national inquirer
truthisfreedom
(23,147 posts)And reproductive rights. They support right to life for the unborn but not the living, support expensive experimental drugs for the desperate and dying, but not the right to die for those dying in unbearable pain.
What a bunch of bizarre ideas.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Also venal as all hell.
honest.abe
(8,678 posts)What could possibly go wrong??