if he pardoned him

I'd just love to see the damn fool separate himself from much of his money.

Or is the lawsuit pro se?

'Saucier announced his upcoming lawsuit'

On the spot.

… would have handled this differently if he hadn't reacted in such and angry and destructive manner.

E-mail those unmarked classified e-mails to herself.the State Department is more to blame.Hillary never did throw the people at the State Department under the bus and she could have.

These people all plead guilty, admit their crime (like D'Sousa) and then claim they were treated unfairly? Welcome to drumpfs America.

..."It's all Hillary's fault" has been the go-to argument for formers since, oh, 2015. Or maybe 1992,depending on how you measure it.

Let's revoke Saucier's pardon, charge the "two guys on (his) ship (who) did the same thing" and throw Trump in prison for overstepping his bounds.

Submarine service is like Fight Club: the first two rules are "you do not talk about this." And the third rule is, "you do not take pictures inside a submarine."

Donald trump while he's at it. I hope those attorneys have sailors aboard subs.

oh wait ......

How do people with no brain matter get through life?

Get out of my country.

Lock you back up.

etc.

They could have gotten him on a lot more than one offense. Now he's also snitched on the other 2 guys.
What a jerk!

And, by accepting a pardon which does not assert his innocence, he has effectively pleaded guilty a second time.

because this is America, dang gummit.

nowhere. Nice try, shithead.

He better act quick to make his money like George Zimmerman and Joe the "Plumber".

“Its not fair” a lawsuit?!?

If everyone filed a lawsuit every time someone had a perceived disparate treatment under the law, we would need a lot more lawyers.

“Two guys on my ship did the same thing..."

Time to testify.

There was no case against Hillary because she clearly did not have intent to do anything harmful or damaging to national security. There was no evidence she knew any information in the server was it should have been classified.

This sailor, on the other hand, took pictures of the inner workings of a nuclear submarine. I guarantee there is absolutely no way he did not know those pictures were not just classified but highly classified. He wouldn't even have access to that part of the boat if he didn't know that.

He absolutely knew what he was doing was illegal.

Huge difference.

His intent was to impress girls or sumpthin' but it's still illegal and he knew it was illegal. Maybe he's like Howard Wolowitz and can't help taking a few pictures to show girls back home.

glad he's correcting these terrible injustices of our legal system.

What an asshole. Trump will be taken away in handcuffs before Hillary, Obama, or Comey

that you have lots of training on what you can, and cannot do, and I expect that training is doubly drummed into you while serving on a submarine that is chock full of sensitive equipment. On my ship even the menu of what was being served in the ship's mess (dining hall) that day was considered classified. Why, I don't know, but in the military you learn not to ask questions like that.

JUSTICE POWELL delivered the opinion of the Court ...

... our decisions consistently have held that government officials are entitled to some form of immunity from suits for damages. As recognized at common law, public officers require this protection to shield them from undue interference with their duties and from potentially disabling threats of liability.

Our decisions have recognized immunity defenses of two kinds. For officials whose special functions or constitutional status requires complete protection from suit, we have recognized the defense of "absolute immunity" ... Our decisions also have extended absolute immunity to certain officials of the Executive Branch. These include prosecutors and similar officials .. executive officers engaged in adjudicative functions .. and the President of the United States ...

For executive officials in general, however, our cases make plain that qualified immunity represents the norm ...

Insubstantial lawsuits can be quickly terminated by federal courts alert to the possibilities of artful pleading. Unless the complaint states a compensable claim for relief .. it should not survive a motion to dismiss. Moreover .. damages suits concerning constitutional violations need not proceed to trial, but can be terminated on a properly supported motion for summary judgment based on the defense of immunity ... In responding to such a motion, plaintiffs may not play dog in the manger; and firm application of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will ensure that federal officials are not harassed by frivolous lawsuits ...

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/457/800

I'll bet his intentions was to sell his pictures but the DOJ played interference. Now we have a pResident who will let him walk because "her emails". I hope he loses all his money going to court. He sounds like a Don con groupie.

This is going nowhere.

1. He KNEW the rules!
2. He pleaded "GUILTY"!