Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 12:56 PM Aug 2012

Obama Administration Finalizes Historic 54.5 mpg Fuel Efficiency Standards

Source: The White House

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

August 28, 2012


Obama Administration Finalizes Historic 54.5 mpg Fuel Efficiency Standards


Consumer Savings Comparable to Lowering Price of Gasoline by $1 Per Gallon by 2025

WASHINGTON, DC – The Obama Administration today finalized groundbreaking standards that will increase fuel economy to the equivalent of 54.5 mpg for cars and light-duty trucks by Model Year 2025. When combined with previous standards set by this Administration, this move will nearly double the fuel efficiency of those vehicles compared to new vehicles currently on our roads. In total, the Administration’s national program to improve fuel economy and reduce greenhouse gas emissions will save consumers more than $1.7 trillion at the gas pump and reduce U.S. oil consumption by 12 billion barrels.

“These fuel standards represent the single most important step we’ve ever taken to reduce our dependence on foreign oil,” said President Obama. “This historic agreement builds on the progress we’ve already made to save families money at the pump and cut our oil consumption. By the middle of the next decade our cars will get nearly 55 miles per gallon, almost double what they get today. It’ll strengthen our nation's energy security, it's good for middle class families and it will help create an economy built to last.”

snip

Achieving the new fuel efficiency standards will encourage innovation and investment in advanced technologies that increase our economic competitiveness and support high-quality domestic jobs in the auto industry. The final standards were developed by DOT’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and EPA following extensive engagement with automakers, the United Auto Workers, consumer groups, environmental and energy experts, states, and the public. Last year, 13 major automakers, which together account for more than 90 percent of all vehicles sold in the United States, announced their support for the new standards. By aligning Federal and state requirements and providing manufacturers with long-term regulatory certainty and compliance flexibility, the standards encourage investments in clean, innovative technologies that will benefit families, promote U.S. leadership in the automotive sector, and curb pollution.



Read more: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20120828/AUTO01/208280392/1361/White-House-finalizes-2025-%E2%80%98historic%E2%80%99-fuel-rules-for-automakers



There's a link to story at Detroit News but this copy came into my mailbox around noon EST without a WH link.

Must thank the O admin for this and keep the good news coming. Not everything has to be done through the do-nothing Congress.

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama Administration Finalizes Historic 54.5 mpg Fuel Efficiency Standards (Original Post) wordpix Aug 2012 OP
Good move. It's about time. leveymg Aug 2012 #1
Make it so the republicans can't undo it Mr. President. liberal N proud Aug 2012 #2
If Romney/Ryan win the election it will be reversed, that's for sure. xtraxritical Aug 2012 #3
Does that include SUV's ? dipsydoodle Aug 2012 #4
"Cars and Light-Duty Trucks", so yeah JustABozoOnThisBus Aug 2012 #9
Current BMW 320d does 49.12 / US gallon i.e 61.4 / Imperial gallon. dipsydoodle Aug 2012 #12
are those real-world or manufacturer's claims? frylock Aug 2012 #21
Real world dipsydoodle Aug 2012 #28
2013 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 650HP 600ft lb - 24 MPG highway snooper2 Aug 2012 #14
Requirements vary by type of vehicle FarCenter Aug 2012 #24
I'd be willing to bet . . . Richard D Aug 2012 #5
I'd also like to see a National Electric Grid for recharging plugins sellitman Aug 2012 #6
Big oil will shut down more refining plants uwep Aug 2012 #7
yep! iamthebandfanman Aug 2012 #10
Yay! kysrsoze Aug 2012 #8
54.5 mpg requirement might necessitate hybrid technology for "almost everything" Kolesar Aug 2012 #11
My father has a 7 year old Prius... awoke_in_2003 Aug 2012 #15
Ok, but I still have a larger question...eom Kolesar Aug 2012 #19
In 1984, the Chevy Sprint achieved 53/mpg highway. LanternWaste Aug 2012 #20
And my stepdad's carburated CRX got 48/mpg on the highway bhikkhu Aug 2012 #30
There's plenty of cars Berlin Expat Aug 2012 #13
your list is 2009---here's link to 2012 - notice the gas mileage has gotten worse except for EVs wordpix Aug 2012 #17
There are a lot of diesel models skepticscott Aug 2012 #27
Oh no !!!! cosmicone Aug 2012 #16
??? oldsarge54 Aug 2012 #23
Thank you, Cha Aug 2012 #18
i'm just breaking 50mpg on my motorcycle frylock Aug 2012 #22
Most motorcycles have horrible aerodynamics.. Fumesucker Aug 2012 #26
Any Bets oldsarge54 Aug 2012 #25
dont applaud this too fast 530jonathan Aug 2012 #29
"until the entire industry goes electric or hybrid"---I think the point is, let's go there wordpix Aug 2012 #32
industry goes electric or hybrid 530jonathan Aug 2012 #33
The CAFE Standards Have Needed to be Raised for Years On the Road Aug 2012 #31

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,371 posts)
9. "Cars and Light-Duty Trucks", so yeah
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 01:51 PM
Aug 2012

it would include SUVs.

I don't know how it'll be done, except that cars and trucks are going to have to be lighter (and probably the occupants will have to be lighter, too

Might have to power some vehicles with diesel, LNG, hydrogen, cold fusion, pedals.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
12. Current BMW 320d does 49.12 / US gallon i.e 61.4 / Imperial gallon.
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 02:23 PM
Aug 2012

Give a year or two and they'll easily meet your target for 2025.

2025 indeed.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
28. Real world
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 05:27 PM
Aug 2012

aside from which manufacturers claims have to be accurate over here. The exception is commercial vehicles where no claims are made at all.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
24. Requirements vary by type of vehicle
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 04:50 PM
Aug 2012
Cars will have to average between 55.3 and 56.2 mpg, while light trucks will have to average between 39.3 and 40.3 mpg in 2025, a 4 percent average annual increase. By 2025, a small SUV like the Ford Escape would have to average 47.5 mpg; a minivan like the Toyota Sienna minivan, 39.2 mpg; a midsize sedan like the Ford Fusion, 54.9 mpg; and a compact car like the Honda Fit, 61.1 mpg.

Richard D

(8,785 posts)
5. I'd be willing to bet . . .
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 01:42 PM
Aug 2012

. . . that when this goes into effect, the price to fill up a tank will be roughly the same or more as it is now.
Not in any way saying this isn't a great thing, btw, just that the bottom line of the oil companies will continue to increase, even if less gasoline is used.

sellitman

(11,607 posts)
6. I'd also like to see a National Electric Grid for recharging plugins
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 01:42 PM
Aug 2012

Or swap outs for batteries much like what I do for my propane tank on my BBQ.

uwep

(108 posts)
7. Big oil will shut down more refining plants
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 01:43 PM
Aug 2012

this is a game that oil companies have been playing with us since the 70's. The more efficient cars get the more they cut back on refining plants. They said as much in the 70's when there was an outcry and the government threatened to intervene. Congress went along with this because of oil's contributions to the re-election campaigns of all the members. They still make token attempts at punishing big oil. These bastards do not care how the poor suffer. Just as now they skyrocket the gas prices because of a tropical storm.
They cry about sending dirty oil across the United States even when they had a major spill of this stuff two years ago. The Republicans are the stanches supporters. They are trying to kill green energy and support tar sands. The want to kill nature. I lived in Alaska when the oil companies started the pipelines. Then they said that their pipelines were bullet proof. Investigate and find out how many leaks have happened. By the way, the oil from Alaska was originally sent to Japan. Maybe it has changed by now. I also heard a rummer that the oil sands that will be pumped to Houston will be refined and shipped offshore (I do not know if this is true, but I would not put it past our great American companies. The profit is greater, and greed, one of the seven deadly sins, guide these companies).

Be prepared, the more mileage cars get, the tighter the supply. They do it to us now. Oh, we have to shut a plant down for maintenance, sorry.

iamthebandfanman

(8,127 posts)
10. yep!
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 01:59 PM
Aug 2012

thats why i say,

nationalization time!!

to me,
energy .. health... education..
are all a matter of 'national security' as it improves the American people/worker.
as such, shouldnt be in the hands of profiteers..


beyond doing that, i dont know what else can really be done about prices..
i mean, i suppose you could get a HUGE (and i mean HUGE) crowd of people to go to refineries and block ports and roads... thatd take ALOT of people though.. enough to make arresting them not worth the effort...
and even if you can successfully do it, you have to take into consideration how it will hurt gas station owners (they are always the ones hurt when we people do a pump strike, because they buy gas in advance)...

so again, i kinda think just taking it over is the only option... lol

Kolesar

(31,182 posts)
11. 54.5 mpg requirement might necessitate hybrid technology for "almost everything"
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 02:11 PM
Aug 2012

There had been a debate of where to set the ultimate limit. A lower standard could be achieved with turbochargers, advanced transmissions and lightweight materials. If the requirement is quite high, then it means a fleet of hybrids. I have my doubts if all hybrids is a great solution. They have lots of parts and need batteries. Product lives would be shorter, among other problems.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
20. In 1984, the Chevy Sprint achieved 53/mpg highway.
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 04:16 PM
Aug 2012

In 1984 (25 years ago), the Chevy Sprint achieved 53/mpg highway. So I don;t think it follows that hybrid tech is a de-facto requirement-- at least not if we can finally do away with the gilded pre-pubescent fantasies of high speeds, high powers, go-anywhere-I-want thought processes.

bhikkhu

(10,725 posts)
30. And my stepdad's carburated CRX got 48/mpg on the highway
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 08:14 PM
Aug 2012

So I don't think the technological barrier is really there at all. Hybrids are great, but it has more to do with lower horsepower, lower weights, and slower acceleration.

The horsepower race has kind of screwed us all over for the past couple of decades, but its easy enough to get used to going slower.

Berlin Expat

(950 posts)
13. There's plenty of cars
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 02:28 PM
Aug 2012

over here in Europe that get over 50 MPG.

Here's a list from Popular Mechanics: http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/news/fuel-economy/4276559


Here in the Czech Republic, gasoline is over $7.00 or so per gallon, once you do the currency conversion, so a high MPG car is a nice thing to have.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
27. There are a lot of diesel models
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 05:24 PM
Aug 2012

that are available in Europe, but that you can't get here for any price. Here are just a few:

http://www.practicalenvironmentalist.com/automobiles/five-cool-diesel-cars-you-cant-buy-in-the-u-s-plus-two-you-might.htm

Doing all that's possible to encourage the introduction of new, high-mileage diesel models into the American market would be a great step for Obama to take.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
26. Most motorcycles have horrible aerodynamics..
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 05:00 PM
Aug 2012

Drag coefficient of not far off 1, while a Prius is about 0.3.

My bike actually gets better gas mileage with an old Vetter Windjammer fairing on it that's about the size of a barn door than it does naked, mid fifties if I'm not in a hurry.

oldsarge54

(582 posts)
25. Any Bets
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 04:56 PM
Aug 2012

Any bets that if we sit on our duffs and Obama loses, that will be high on the list of "job killing" regulations to be axed?

530jonathan

(16 posts)
29. dont applaud this too fast
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 06:45 PM
Aug 2012

as someone who works on cars for a living, i can tell you this will make cars even more complex, and WAY more costly to repair! I welcome this news though, it means more money for me!! There is no magic way to make engines get this kind of mileage, only way to do it is to more precisely control the air / fuel ratio combined with light weight and smaller engines. This means more costly sensors to monitor everything the engine does, under ever conceivable operating condition. Dont get me wrong, im all for getting off the tit of the oil industry, but this will make cars more expensive and more costly to repair until the entire industry goes electric or hybrid.. at least my 2 cents anyway

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
32. "until the entire industry goes electric or hybrid"---I think the point is, let's go there
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 09:12 PM
Aug 2012

Thanks for your points, though. But O did work with the industry including UAW to get this deal so they must have thought it was doable.

530jonathan

(16 posts)
33. industry goes electric or hybrid
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 10:30 AM
Aug 2012

everything is doable... everything.. if you have enough money. I do see it all going hybrid/ electric.. maybe if that happens battery costs will go down. But right now these batteries have a finite life (like your laptop battery) but when the need replacement, the costs will total the car.. at least right now anyway.

On the Road

(20,783 posts)
31. The CAFE Standards Have Needed to be Raised for Years
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 09:05 PM
Aug 2012

but 54.5 mpg is insanely high as an average. That means every 27mpg vehicle would have to be balanced by one electric vehicle.

If vans, pickups and similar vehicles are excluded, it might have an outside chance. But vans carry more passengers, while pickups are used to haul things, which is extremely common. Of course, if they are excluded from the standard, their sales are going to spike. Similarly with any commercial vehicles not covered by the standard. The CAFE standards need to cover a broader range of vehicles and provide a realistic goal.

2025 is a long time from now. I don't really this give this much of a shot of becoming reality.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama Administration Fina...