The Russian Threat 'Is Real,' Trump Officials Say, Vowing to Protect U.S. Elections
Source: The New York Times
By Michael D. Shear
Aug. 2, 2018
WASHINGTON Trump administration officials on Thursday vowed to defend the United States elections against threats from Russia and other countries, describing influence campaigns by Americas adversaries in blunt terms rarely used by President Trump.
The heads of the nations national security agencies said Russia was still trying to influence and disrupt the midterm elections, and they pledged to help local and state governments counter those efforts in the weeks ahead.
Russia attempted to interfere with the last election, Christopher A. Wray, the F.B.I. director, said, adding that Russian operatives were continuing to operate against the election system in malign ways. He said the United States government must face the threat with fierce determination and focus.
Mr. Wray and other top national security officials, who spoke at a White House news briefing, did not describe specific threats to the coming elections, and they were vague in saying how the government was responding to what they called Russias interference campaign.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/02/us/politics/russia-election-security-midterm.html
UPDATE:
On Election Interference, Trump And His Advisers Sound Completely Out Of Step
By Kate Riga | August 2, 2018 2:22 pm
At the White House press briefing Thursday, Sarah Huckabee Sanders brought in the big guns to address election interference, including National Security Adviser John Bolton, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen and FBI Director Christopher Wray.
All of them, except for Nielsen, specifically mentioned Russias past and future- intended interference in U.S. elections.
Bolton: Since January 2017, the President has taken decisive action to defend our election systems from meddling and interference. This includes measures to heighten the security and resilience of election systems and processes, to confront Russian and other foreign malign influence in the United States, to confront such aggression through international action, and to reinforce a strong sanctions regime.
Coats: In regards to Russian involvement in the midterm elections, we continue to see a pervasive messaging campaign by Russia to try to weaken and divide the United States We also know the Russians tried to hack into and steal information from candidates and government officials alike.
Wray: As I have said consistently, Russia attempted to interfere with the last election and continues to engage in malign influence operations to this day. This is a threat we need to take extremely seriously and to tackle and respond to with fierce determination and focus.
more
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/on-election-interference-trump-and-his-advisers-sound-completely-out-of-step
woodsprite
(11,923 posts)William Seger
(10,779 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)This was on every TeeVee screen at the gym
TWO YEARS LATE, dudes..
The government will protect us from it.
yeah right,,... it will only be foreign interference is dems win anything.. you can put $$$ on it..
Solly Mack
(90,779 posts)More voter suppression, pushing Voter ID, and other onerous suggestions will come out of this.
All this is built up around Trump's saying Russia helped/helping Democrats and how he is so much tougher against Russia.
I don't buy their "concern" at all.
murielm99
(30,754 posts)November elections, if Democrats gain a majority.
I am worried.
murielm99
(30,754 posts)did not accompany any of these officials when they made their statements is interesting.
It may be their twisted way of validating their "concerns." 45 has sided with Putin. They are showing their concern in spite of his absence at this event. I am not buying it.
RainCaster
(10,908 posts)That is the only thing proven to work!!
sheshe2
(83,850 posts)mac56
(17,574 posts)Attempted? No.
INTERFERED.
PaulX2
(2,032 posts)Republicans are counting on Putin to help them keep the House.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)buy the BS.
TheFrenchRazor
(2,116 posts)eringer
(460 posts)"TRUMP OFFICIALS" - What a contradiction in terms! Trump never had any "officials" speak for him, except maybe Hope Hicks.
https://people.com/politics/president-trump-kisses-hope-hicks-goodbye-leaves-white-house/
cloudbase
(5,524 posts)". . .and he defended what he said had been the presidents intense focus on the issue since he was inaugurated in January 2017."