Trump Administration Is Using Federal Disability Law To Disenfranchise Minority Voters
Source: Think Progress
By Kira Lerner, Aug. 22, 2018, 10:27 am.
Randolph County, Georgia is the latest place where officials are using the Americans with Disabilities Act to suppress votes.
A majority-black county in rural Georgia announced a plan last week to close seven of its nine polling places ahead of the November election, claiming the polls cannot continue to operate because they are not compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The move sparked instant opposition from voting rights advocates, who have threatened legal action if Randolph County follows though with the plan. Activists are also scrambling to collect enough signatures to stop the effort before Friday, when the election board will make a final determination.
The racial implications of the closures have generated significant attention. The county is over 61 percent black, and one of the polling locations that would be shuttered serves a precinct where more than 95 percent of voters are African American. Had the U.S. Supreme Court not gutted the Voting Rights Act in 2013, the closures would most likely have been blocked by the Department of Justice.
But the method the county is using to justify the closures has generated less attention. Republican lawmakers and election administrators in Randolph County are not the first to use the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), intended to protect the nations disabled communities, as a pretext to disenfranchise minority voters...More...
Read more: https://thinkprogress.org/ada-voter-suppression-cd7031080bfd/
Jim Tucker, an attorney and member of the Native American Voting Rights Coalition, said he learned earlier this year that the DOJs Disability Rights Section is targeting at least 3 largely Native American counties, where facilities used as polling locations often lack paved parking lots, designated handicapped parking spots, entrance ramps, wide doorways, and other ADA-required features.
The Justice Department has threatened enforcement actions in several counties if local governments do not either spend large sums of money to modernize polling locations or close them altogether. Its a diabolical move: citing one civil rights statute (the ADA) as the justification for violating another (the VRA), Tucker, who previously worked in the DOJs Voting Section. These sorts of closures can effectively disenfranchise entire communities of voters, all under the false guise of purportedly seeking to make polling places accessible for the disabled.
The areas the Justice Department has targeted point to the larger goal of suppressing non-white voters. Since Trump, the department has settled at least 5 enforcement actions in counties where polling locations do not meet the stringent requirements of the ADA. Four of the five counties have significant minority populations:
A person votes in the handicapped assisted booth at Bishop Leo E. O'Neil Youth Center November 4, 2014 in Manchester, New Hampshire.
Photo of one polling location that is not ADA compliant. Credit: ACLU of Georgia.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)appalachiablue
(41,178 posts)to do this to the most vulnerable individuals already dealing with obstacles and harsh existences.
And the voters and supporters of this behavior.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45274175
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,047 posts)keithbvadu2
(36,949 posts)Some polling places will bring the ballot out to the car.
slumcamper
(1,606 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,637 posts)c-rational
(2,596 posts)there is a workaround, as if ADA compliance is not economically justifiable it is not required for older structures, but then again you need to go to court.
Takket
(21,639 posts)This isnt how the ADA works. The ADA requires facilities for public use to be accessible but doesnt require you to shut down if they are not. Generally an existing building isnt required to upgrade until they are doing some other construction activities or until someone makes a complaint about lack of access to the Owner or City.
But even if someone has complained shutting the polling place down does nothing for the disabled person. If a grievance is filed the logical options are requiring an upgrade which takes time and money, providing another polling place or temporary accommodations at the existing one, or easiest thing to do is offer an absentee ballot to anyone disabled that wants one.
summer_in_TX
(2,761 posts)Nathan Lane in Georgia was so pissed off about the planned closure of seven of nine polling places that he has started a GoFundMe account to raise money to install 7 permanent wheel-chair ramps to bring the voting facilities up to ADA compliance. He tweets that he used to do general contracting and knows how to build these himself. He's written to his Congressman for help in pushing the building permits through if he can get enough funds raised and is hoping for donations of building supplies to the extent possible.
https://www.gofundme.com/ada-ramps-for-7-voting-centers
Link to tweet
https://twitter.com/VetMe2020
Excited about GoFundMe campaign to get the 7 Ada ramps built. We finally all can do something to make a difference if we can get 3,250 people to donate only $20 we will have enough $ to get ramps built, s/w @SanfordBishop(Georgia) office they will help with permits...
Link to tweet
https://twitter.com/VetMe2020
I do not have a Facebook page Facebook is the best way to get this out I'm asking everyone to please retweet this and put it on your Facebook pages let's get the word out and prevent
Thanks
May you be blessed, your endeavors grand and happiness always yours...
SergeStorms
(19,204 posts)were good enough for everyone this spring when the GOP had primary and run-off elections there. That's right, these same polling places were used by Republicans a few months ago, but they've mysteriously become "non-compliant" since then.
I call bullshit. Not only bullshit, but BIGLY bullshit!
BumRushDaShow
(129,608 posts)whether polling stations in OTHER (majority "white" ) districts are ALSO 100% compliant. I doubt it.