NY Times publishes anonymous op-ed from Trump official working to 'thwart' his 'worst inclinations'
Source: The Hill
The New York Times on Wednesday published an anonymous op-ed written by an author who claimed to be one of a number of Trump administration officials working to thwart President Trumps worst inclinations.
In the piece, titled, I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration, the author says that while officials want the administration to succeed, they have had to work against Trumps misguided impulses and parts of his agenda.
"To be clear, ours is not the popular 'resistance' of the left," the piece reads. "We want the administration to succeed and think that many of its policies have already made America safer and more prosperous."
But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic, the unidentified official wrote.
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/media/405226-ny-times-publishes-op-ed-claiming-to-be-written-by-senior-trump-official
Link to tweet
Liberalagogo
(1,770 posts)n/t
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)or death of most non white humans, no str8t humans, etc.
irisblue
(32,996 posts)Definition of coup d'état. plural coups d'état or coups d'etat ˌkü-(ˌ dā-ˈtä, ˈkü-(ˌ dā-ˌtä, -də- : a sudden decisive exercise of force in politics; especially : the violent overthrow or alteration of an existing government by a small group. Merriam Webster.com
I am honestly godsmacked
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)redwitch
(14,945 posts)Do the right thing and work through legal channels to have him removed. This is absolutely crazy!
hibbing
(10,099 posts)Snellius
(6,881 posts)Sounds like the inmates have rebelled in Crazytown.
haele
(12,661 posts)However, it's still just a guess, and he's already in Woodward's book, so he's probably on the way out.
Haele
Snellius
(6,881 posts)And the prime example given in op-ed concerned relations with Russia.
Granny M
(1,395 posts)Or people loyal to Pence. He wants the job.
Snellius
(6,881 posts)Granny M
(1,395 posts)He's very ambitious, and is convinced that God wants him to be president. Christian Taliban, waiting in the wings. He's clever enough to hide his tracks, though.
mulsh
(2,959 posts)n/t
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Pence and the scheming evangelicals popped up instantly.
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)what with the reference to foreign policy.
PatSeg
(47,520 posts)Pompeo, Mattis, or Kelly. I don't think it would be Pence, as he could be part of the Mueller investigation.
vsrazdem
(2,177 posts)I just keep picturing that interview he was giving when they told him Trump invited Russia to the White House, and his reaction.
I'd forgotten about him. He seemed seriously disturbed about Trump's attitude towards Putin and Russia.
riversedge
(70,253 posts)I am not impressed.
BumRushDaShow
(129,165 posts)there are ads in between sections of it...
riversedge
(70,253 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,165 posts)but the space where the ad would be just says "Advertisement" in white blocks between sections of the editorial. And I have both ublock Origin and Ghostery off!
riversedge
(70,253 posts)riversedge
(70,253 posts)edit to add:
This person needs to make her/him self known. Her job will be gone but maybe it will give some courage to others to speak up.
BumRushDaShow
(129,165 posts)they are pretty fascinating (in a good way - at least the last time I checked)!
irisblue
(32,996 posts)Kevin Gannon (@TheTattooedProf) Tweeted:
This person is still a collaborator, not some heroic figure on the inside. They can try to ease their conscience with an anonymous platitude-filled essay, but they are still complicit in everything this administration has wrought. (1/3) https://t.co/numdaCti2s
Link to tweet
Kevin Gannon (@TheTattooedProf) Tweeted:
If they wanted to, they and others like them could have Trump out tomorrow. They could go to Mueller, do an interview, take the lid off the whole pot. If it's as bad so they say, then anonymous half-measures are no remedy at all. They just let the problem fester (2/3)
Link to tweet
Kevin Gannon (@TheTattooedProf) Tweeted:
They, and the rest of the GOP, have traded our democracy for the power to pack the courts and gut the New Deal. This is no principled stand by some heroic, selfless stalwart. It's the pitiful, post-hoc rationale of a sniveling coward who knows their time is almost done. (3/3)
Link to tweet
haele
(12,661 posts)and not just because he was in the military, either. He stayed on, played along with Nazi party politics, and rose through the ranks. More than a few respectable career German officers left Germany - or held true to their beliefs and got violently purged in the mid/early 30's when the long knives started coming out - rather than sign on to Hitler's loyal corps.
Haele
handmade34
(22,756 posts)this anonymous letter does not make me feel better... it makes me even more angry
irisblue
(32,996 posts)Dr. L.D. Burnett (@LDBurnett) Tweeted:
This isn't "an important perspective"--this is a statement that administrators in the Executive Branch have staged a coup against the sitting President. If they find him unfit to lead, they need to invoke the 25th Amendment. They don't get to decide to be a shadow government https://t.co/xd8FdY6KEi
Link to tweet
This gets worse& worse
llmart
(15,542 posts)in the White House as trump runs around crazed looking for leakers and the leakers run amok trying to outdo one another to keep him under control.
Too bad our country and form of government and standing in the world is affected by all this.
BumRushDaShow
(129,165 posts)but wasn't sure whether I could post news about it here.
Whoever wrote it wants to have it both ways and the comments that were left at the piece pretty much echo that thought.
Here's an excerpt -
I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration
I work for the president but like-minded colleagues and I have vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.
President Trump is facing a test to his presidency unlike any faced by a modern American leader. Its not just that the special counsel looms large. Or that the country is bitterly divided over Mr. Trumps leadership. Or even that his party might well lose the House to an opposition hellbent on his downfall. The dilemma which he does not fully grasp is that many of the senior officials in his own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations. I would know. I am one of them.
The root of the problem is the presidents amorality. Anyone who works with him knows he is not moored to any discernible first principles that guide his decision making. Although he was elected as a Republican, the president shows little affinity for ideals long espoused by conservatives: free minds, free markets and free people. At best, he has invoked these ideals in scripted settings. At worst, he has attacked them outright. In addition to his mass-marketing of the notion that the press is the enemy of the people, President Trumps impulses are generally anti-trade and anti-democratic.
Dont get me wrong. There are bright spots that the near-ceaseless negative coverage of the administration fails to capture: effective deregulation, historic tax reform, a more robust military and more. But these successes have come despite not because of the presidents leadership style, which is impetuous, adversarial, petty and ineffective.
To be clear, ours is not the popular resistance of the left. We want the administration to succeed and think that many of its policies have already made America safer and more prosperous. But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic. That is why many Trump appointees have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr. Trumps more misguided impulses until he is out of office.
<...>
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/opinion/trump-white-house-anonymous-resistance.html
In essence, they want their cake and eat it too and once they have everything - which includes the SCOTUS nominee - they will discard him. Thing is, he is messing up their trade deals at the moment and Congress seems completely frozen in place to act on correcting that mess.
Astraea
(468 posts)If you republican rats really gave a shit, this man would not be holding office today. You're all enablers.
maxrandb
(15,336 posts)Dear anonymous source...go fuck yourself sideways with a First Edition hard cover copy of Atlas Shrugged you worthless piece of amphibian shit!
Just fuck you and your; "sure the president's a raving fucking amoral, cruel, petty evil prick but hey! how about that fucking 1.5 trillion dollars giveaway to the American oligarchs and the coal ash and arcenic in your drinking water"
"Hey! I helped save you fucking progs from nuclear winter, but have you fucking seen judge Kavanaugh? He's going to fuck over working people and women for 40 fucking years... you're welcome!"
Fuck this anonymous jackass and his gaslighting bullshit.
lillypaddle
(9,581 posts)it do eventually hit the fan. OMG.
bucolic_frolic
(43,206 posts)wiggs
(7,814 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,165 posts)Folks should see the comments.
BigmanPigman
(51,613 posts)She was on Nicole Wallace's show on the phone and she was shocked by this.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,175 posts)Put out in order for Trump to go full def con on all White House staff using "national security" as his excuse.
What tips me off is there was no need to say:
"There are bright spots that the near-ceaseless negative coverage of the administration fails to capture: effective deregulation, historic tax reform, a more robust military and more."
"effective deregulation"? How?
"historic tax reform"? For who?
"a more robust military" Why the need?
Its like they wanted their cake and eat it too. Use this false flag to implement mass firings and hiring of Trump cultists, but still get a little advertisement in there as well. Mix in a little pro-Trump 2020 talking points. Just to make them seem even nuttier. ie....that Trump is doing a great job on multiple fronts, but this nut wants to sabotage the whole thing for his own personal grudges he has overblown in his head.
Put out to cement the narrative of the terrible and dare I say treasonous behaviour of a LEAKER for his deplorables to get more angry about, and defend their poor betrayed and persecuted Dear Leader.
BumRushDaShow
(129,165 posts)while signalling to their "crowd" to just hang in there because "they got this" and their show will go on.
chowder66
(9,074 posts)their agenda through and garner votes in the midterms. They may not like some of the stuff he does but they
aren't stopping him from destroying our reputation around the world.
chowder66
(9,074 posts)..effective deregulation, historic tax reform, a more robust military
There will be those that think... Oh, these republicans are protecting us.
Then there will be those that think.... these republicans are the deep state and undermining the Potus.
Both are reasons to vote.
Solly Mack
(90,775 posts)Excuse me. Allergies to bullshit.
handmade34
(22,756 posts)
.that the near-ceaseless negative coverage of the administration fails to capture: effective deregulation, historic tax reform, a more robust military and more..."
fuck you anonymous source... these are not bright spots for the majority of U.S. Americans... you are just complicit is making our Nation worse off... you are merely trying to justify your exploitation of a failed election to get your dangerous agenda passed
irisblue
(32,996 posts)DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)"Lodestar" isn't a frequently used word and Pense seems to have a proclivity to it.
SayItLoud
(1,702 posts)Member of the administration to put country before party and policy and go ON THE RECORD with an OP ED, or interview?
That person will be believed and denials from the Oral Office will hold little value or validity. She or he will also become a national hero.
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)To be clear, ours is not the popular resistance of the left. We want the administration to succeed and think that many of its policies have already made America safer and more prosperous.
Translation: We love right wing conservative policies. We thought we had a compliant president, but we have a crazy person instead. Please help us get rid of him so we can have Mike Pence sign all our wet dreams legislation.
Corgigal
(9,291 posts)Thinking they are smarter and better then the voted in (?) , maybe, President.
irisblue
(32,996 posts)tenderfoot
(8,437 posts)There's another dumbass quote:
"Dont get me wrong. There are bright spots that the near-ceaseless negative coverage of the administration fails to capture: effective deregulation, historic tax reform, a more robust military and more."
This is bullshit.
EarthFirst
(2,901 posts)Is that how we ended up with Kavanaugh?
The resistance?
Gee; thanks for your service!
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)This is published less than a week before Bob Woodward's book Fear comes out, and a day after several excerpts from that book are published. It tells me that a) the author is one of Woodward's sources, and b) it makes it more likely than ever that the damning interviews and comments in Fear are authentic.
The Liberal Lion
(1,414 posts)When I read this in the NYT I almost puked in my mouth when I saw they DARED to apply the term "Resistance" to themselves. I saw this anonymous confession for what it is: a undignified attempt to sanitize the GOP from the responsibility it has bringing what they themselves call a "amoral" monster into the White House. The worse part about it, THEY KNOW trump HAD RUSSIAN ASSISTANCE IN "WINNING". I used all caps because the Op-Ed made me that pissed.
That all being said, this is certainly a scathing indictment of that orange moron.
randr
(12,412 posts)that is detrimental to the health of our republic,
If this were true they have a responsibility to remove the treat to our nation.
dchill
(38,510 posts)dalton99a
(81,534 posts)It's a pile of fucking bullshit
SayItLoud
(1,702 posts)OKNancy
(41,832 posts)LOL someone higher up, someone who wants to protect their reputation down the line. Yep its Jared. Oh and precipitated by McCains funeral.
aquamarina
(1,865 posts)After reading this oped, it strikes me that this is a continuation of the republican policy of party before country. Don't get me wrong, I'm thankful that there are actual adults in the White House who have kept T from starting WWIII. However, none of these people are elected officials and therefore all of them are acting outside of the Constitution.
As for the oped, I found these lines particularly insulting,
"The bigger concern is not what Mr. Trump had done to the predicency but rather what we as a nation have allowed him to do to us. We have sunk low with him and allowed our discourse to be stripped of civility."
What a load of hogwash. Republicans and Trump supporters have done this to our country. Elected democrats and and other Trump opponetns have been sounding the alarm for years. However, as republicans hold all the levers of power, only they have the ability to stop him. And as far as I can tell have done NOTHING to do so. The most obvious thing they could do now is to put a halt to any Supreme Court appointment until Mueller has completed his report but they won't even do that. So cry me a river. If the adults in the West Wing actually REALLY cared for the well being of the USA they would all come forward and if the adults in Congress really cared for the well being the the USA, they would hold hearings and put a stop to it. Since they haven't and won't, then this clusterfuck is theirs and theirs alone.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Could have come from anywhere.
Auggie
(31,174 posts)wiggs
(7,814 posts)the NYT publish, then deny in an effort to discredit the NYT and the 'fake news' in general. I've thought for a long time that journalists have to be super careful because we know there is no bottom to how low the WH will go...forgeries, fake op eds, lying press secretaries, lies about statistics....they will do whatever it takes to get over. (the previous gop WH did this too...but not to this level).
I hope the NYT was careful.
gldstwmn
(4,575 posts)ancianita
(36,110 posts)KY_EnviroGuy
(14,492 posts)Link to tweet
Kile Griffin:
He told confidants he suspects the official works on national security issues or in the Justice Dept.https://www.
safe@second:
Someone else asked what color Trump turns when he's livid and the response was "PLAID"........