Progressives impatient with McCaskill's 'hedging' on Kavanaugh nomination
Source: Kansas City Star
WASHINGTON
The same week that other Democrats relentlessly grilled Judge Brett Kavanaugh and progressive activists occupied Senate offices, Sen. Claire McCaskill complimented the federal judges intelligence.
But in the next sentence, she listed reasons she has doubts about whether he should become a Supreme Court justice.
Progressive Democrats are getting impatient with McCaskill, as the Missouri Democrat refuses to say how she plans on voting on President Donald Trumps nominee or even comment on his testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee. Shes waiting until after Kavanaugh submits additional answers to the committee next week.
There are certainly things in there that tell me that hes a competent and qualified lawyer
Someone who is smart and understands how the law works, understands the distinctions between administrative law and understands the various branches of government and the checks and balances, so all of that is reassuring, McCaskill told McClatchy.
Read more: https://www.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article218009020.html
rpannier
(24,338 posts)I have had issues with her in the past, but I think waiting for the additional answers gives the impression that she is giving thought to her decision
If she decides no, she can at least say she gave him a full vetting before she decided
benld74
(9,909 posts)3 times daily for 2 weeks now
Tell Claire to vote NO on Kavanaugh. He doesnt have the credentials for SC. Heck, he doesnt have the credentials for the job he has now.
Ive voted for her supported her for years. NOW she needs to vote NO on this fool for me!!
orleans
(34,073 posts)SergeStorms
(19,204 posts)organized crime. There's no other way to define them.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)...who are impatient. It's the spectrum of Democrats horrified by the new normal that Kavanugh will make into settled law.
standingtall
(2,787 posts)There is no way McCaskill can win without St. Louis turning out. So there is no way she can vote to confirm this guy. Picking up republican voters will not help her if she let's down her base.
Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)SharonClark
(10,014 posts)who will not turn out for her.
notdarkyet
(2,226 posts)radical noodle
(8,013 posts)A race we really need to have her win. If we don't peel off any GOP votes for Kavanaugh, then it won't matter how she votes.
Yavin4
(35,446 posts)Republicans are not going to vote for McCaskill because she voted for Kavanaugh. She's making a big mistake here.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)Remember, it's not just Republicans v. Democrats; about 1/3 of the electorate doesn't claim to identify with either party.
Yavin4
(35,446 posts)That's wishful thinking. You have to turn out the base in order to win.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)There's a solid third of the electorate that doesn't identify with either party.
BumRushDaShow
(129,472 posts)for some reason I don't think she is going to break ranks with the party and vote for this guy.
The ones to worry about are Donnelly and Manchin.
rpannier
(24,338 posts)Manchin will do whatever he is going to do mostly because he believes in it. He's put distance between himself and his opponent. He is well-liked by the majority of people in West Virginia. As friends of mine from WVa have said, "If he were a Republican, he'd hold a 50 point lead right now, instead of a 10."
Donnelly is unpredictable and he doesn't have the numbers that Manchin has. He panders
As to McCaskill, I think waiting is probably a better thing politically. She can lay claim to having done due diligence when she votes no. She needs St Louis to come out strong. Voting for this guy thinking it will get her Republican votes is a fool's errand. I think she knows that
BumRushDaShow
(129,472 posts)what they do will be dependent on what the usual suspect GOPers (Collins, Murkowski) do and if those two go along, then Kavanaugh is in, and those moderate (D)s will have cover if they support the appointment too because their votes wouldn't have mattered anyway.
Of course some of exiting loudmouths like Flake or Corker or even someone as innocuous like Heller, who may lose his own seat this cycle, could vote "no" as a parting shot... But they have proven time and time and time again that they will support every draconian appointment, policy, and GOP-crafted bill that gets handed to them.
It's that old cliche about "Democrats falling in love and Republicans falling in line".
DeminPennswoods
(15,290 posts)Let's start with repeated lying to the Senate while testifying under oath. That is immediately disqualifying regardless of his positions on any other issue.
He may well be corrupt as evidenced by his ability to pay down between 60-200k of baseball ticket debt on his modest salaries.
He was involved in the very worst antics of the Bush WH including the decision to torture prisoners.
And those don't even include his far outside even the mainstream conservatism views.
Rebl2
(13,555 posts)ever ask him about that debt and how he managed to pay it off, not that he would tell the truth. You mentioned repeatedly lying. How about the fact he pretty much didnt answer the questions that Democratic Senators asked him. He danced all around the questions and never really answered many of them.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)Even more so than Trump, Kavanaugh could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and get confirmed. He will get every Republican vote no matter what is uncovered. This is the one nominee the Ricketts Family (huge Republican donors and devout Catholics) really want on the court because it opens the window to overturning Roe and Griswold (and possibly Brown). Don't hold your breath for Collins or Murkowski.
DeminPennswoods
(15,290 posts)making it 50-50 with Pence the tie-breaker. You'd need one more R to vote either no or present. It's why I don't understand why Dems, or at the DSCC, aren't covering NV media with ads pressuring Heller.
sinkingfeeling
(51,474 posts)duforsure
(11,885 posts)It'll be giving putin and the russian mafia a license to use trump to do and get away with anything they want to with no regard for any laws, or rules, or boundaries, and will invite even greater disasters for this country , and others, and for the American people where corruption runs wild unchecked out of OUR White House. What do they have to think about now? Every Senator who does vote for him will regret what they've done, and not just getting forced from office , but forever in their lives.
pecosbob
(7,543 posts)but there could be no bigger betrayal of Democratic Party principles. Any Dem Senator that votes for Kavanaugh should be reviled, shunned and expunged from the Party.