Stormy Daniels' Suit Against Trump Could Be Tossed Over 'Chilling Effect'
Last edited Tue Sep 25, 2018, 09:09 AM - Edit history (1)
Source: The Daily Beast
U.S. District Judge S. James Otero hinted he might toss out Stormy Daniels defamation suit against Trump due to its potential to hamper political discourse.
Kate Briquelet
09.24.18 9:57 PM ET
A federal judge in Los Angeles could soon toss the defamation lawsuit Stormy Daniels filed against President Trump earlier this year.
On Monday afternoon, U.S. District Judge S. James Otero said Trumps tweet in response to Daniels claim that a mystery goon intimidated her in Las Vegas appeared to be rhetorical hyperbole and protected speech.
In April, Daniels and her attorney presented a forensic sketch of a man who allegedly warned her to leave Trump alone in 2011, soon after she spilled the story of her alleged romp with Trump to InTouch magazine.
Daniels sued Trump for defamation, claiming he was pegging her as a liar on Twitter.
Read more: https://www.thedailybeast.com/republicans-and-democrats-dismissed-anita-hill-christine-blasey-ford-wont-be-so-easy-to-ignore?ref=home
riversedge
(70,248 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,204 posts)DonViejo
(60,536 posts)aggiesal
(8,919 posts)Story about Blasey-Ford not Stormy Daniels.
SWBTATTReg
(22,144 posts)political activities. If you're guilty, you're guilty. Plain and simple.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)Calista241
(5,586 posts)He's allowed to say stuff on the internet. He said: "A sketch years later about a nonexistent man. A total con job, playing the Fake News Media for Fools (but they know it)!"
I for one, am glad Trump is tweeting all the time (with bad grammar and everything) as it only increases our likelihood of winning the House back this fall.
How many of us have called Trump and others a liar here on this website? If Daniels won this defamation case, that ruling could very easily extend to encompass stuff all of us do on a daily basis.