Centrist Democrat Aguilar jumps into leadership race
Source: Politico
Rep. Pete Aguilar is launching a bid for House Democrats No. 5 leadership position, triggering a race that pits the moderate-minded Californian against a progressive East Coast colleague, Rep. Katherine Clark.
The 39-year-old New Democrat will pitch members on a more inclusive leadership table, promising that as House Democratic Caucus vice chairman, hed solicit early and frequent feedback from all the different caucuses. With a likely influx of both more progressive freshman as well as new members from purple or even red districts, Aguilar says its essential that the different factions work together to have an effective caucus.
Its going to be more important than ever that we have a caucus that works for everyone, and I think making sure that that inclusiveness is a primary piece of this vice chair position
to make sure we are all working together, Aguilar said in an interview.
The race perfectly highlights the debate raging inside the Democrats Party about which direction to tack as 2020 approaches: Clark, who declared her candidacy for the post in late July, is a member of the Progressive Caucus and could see a boon from an energized and emboldened left-wing of the caucus.
Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/25/aguilar-clark-congress-democrats-838586
George II
(67,782 posts)David__77
(23,423 posts)I don't know if you consider all of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) members to be far left. I just wanted to point out that the CPC has more members than the New Democrat Coalition.
I think the Democratic Party has plenty of room for various caucuses and ideologies. I imagine that these two candidates have votes that are largely in alignment with one another.
lovemydogs
(575 posts)JCanete
(5,272 posts)include all the times that the democratic party and the republican party voted together as well.
George II
(67,782 posts)JCanete
(5,272 posts)that centrist voting record is preferable to somebody to the far left of that centrist. That position doesn't make a lot of sense to me. I guess the alternative is that you just like contributing random bits of trivia.
George II
(67,782 posts)...in the United States as a whole, and in Washington, can be considered "centrists". As I said, anywhere from 60-80% of all Democrats can be categorized as "centrists", more likely closer to the 80% number than the 60% number. Even many "progressives", when looking at ALL the issues in front of us, would consider themselves "centrists" on a number of those issues.
We have a representative government, and our legislators should reflect the makeup of the full breadth of their constituencies and the population of the country. There will be some on the far left, and some on the far right (hopefully fewer), but most in the "center". The question is, where do you draw the lines between the three?
Finally, this is serious business, I don't consider the overall makeup of the Democratic Party, consisting of tens of millions of Americans, a "random bit of trivia". You?
jalan48
(13,871 posts)yellowdogintexas
(22,264 posts)to me that article spells Party Unity and Solidarity in Congress.
The Republicans are in lockstep. We also should be.
George II
(67,782 posts)....of the entire Democratic Party?
Not I.
jalan48
(13,871 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)jalan48
(13,871 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,356 posts)"The race perfectly highlights the debate raging inside the Democrats Party [...]"
The error is in the original article. It's the Democratic Party, not "Democrats Party". Must've been written by a Repubaclan.
BumRushDaShow
(129,143 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,143 posts)This is bullshit. Unlike the GOP (or at least what they are willing to admit to), Democrats are a "big tent" and yes, it can be like herding cats sometimes but there ARE certain platforms points that we DO agree with. And number ONE should be to "tack" away from what is going on right now.