Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 09:08 AM Oct 2018

Survey of battleground House districts shows Democrats with narrow edge

Source: The Washington Post



By Scott Clement and Dan Balz October 8 at 7:00 AM

Likely voters who live in 69 battleground House districts across the country narrowly prefer Democratic candidates, according to a new Washington Post-Schar School survey, a potentially worrying sign for Republicans given that the overwhelming percentage of these districts are currently in GOP hands.

With just a month to the midterm elections and with early voting set to begin in many states, the new poll highlights the challenge for Republicans as they seek to maintain their House majority at a time when President Trump’s approval rating remains below 50 percent despite sustained economic growth, low unemployment and a rising stock market.

The survey of 2,672 likely voters by The Post and the Schar School at George Mason University shows that likely voters in these districts favor Democrats by a slight margin: 50 percent prefer the Democratic nominee and 46 percent prefer the Republican. By way of comparison, in 2016 these same districts favored Republican candidates over Democratic ones by 15 percentage points, 56 percent to 41 percent.

[Read full poll results | How the poll was conducted ]

Women are driving Democratic support in the battleground districts, favoring the party’s candidates by 54 percent to 40 percent. Men in these districts favor Republicans by 51 percent to 46 percent. That gender difference continues a pattern that has been seen throughout the year in other polls and in special elections.





Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/survey-of-battleground-house-districts-shows-democrats-with-narrow-edge/2018/10/07/f45e13f2-c812-11e8-b1ed-1d2d65b86d0c_story.html

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Survey of battleground House districts shows Democrats with narrow edge (Original Post) DonViejo Oct 2018 OP
A narrow edge won't be enough to overcome the Russian ratfucking. Squinch Oct 2018 #1
No more Debbie Downerism. We will have tech people, poll watchers, lawyers, etc. GO VOTE! LBM20 Oct 2018 #9
what is needed is people to knock on doors and make calls crazycatlady Oct 2018 #13
That's not "Debbie Downerism." That's realism. That means it will take more than Squinch Oct 2018 #15
538 gives the Dems a 74.1 percent chance of retaking the house Thekaspervote Oct 2018 #2
Not good enough. tavernier Oct 2018 #3
Likely voter ? smooth64 Oct 2018 #4
Pennsylvania districts were redrawn this year FakeNoose Oct 2018 #5
Jinx! BumRushDaShow Oct 2018 #7
a lot of them do that, and I really think that is a flawed assumption, especially based on what the still_one Oct 2018 #11
Since PA was redistricted BumRushDaShow Oct 2018 #6
Here we go....The Russians are coming and the Corporate mafia News organinzations INdemo Oct 2018 #8
By the way, this is a big lead louis c Oct 2018 #10
Correct Haynx Oct 2018 #14
LVs DeminPennswoods Oct 2018 #12
Yes indeed- but we still need to get out the vote FakeNoose Oct 2018 #16

Squinch

(51,014 posts)
15. That's not "Debbie Downerism." That's realism. That means it will take more than
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 12:06 PM
Oct 2018

preaching to the choir about voting and being sanguine because we have lawyers and tech people.

For example, that means that if you are in one of the 28 states where Russians have been found to be rummaging around in the voting systems, you need to be on the phone daily to your representatives demanding to know what they are doing to make your vote safe. And if you don't get an answer, you need to go and camp out at their offices with a couple of hundred of your best friends.

 

smooth64

(58 posts)
4. Likely voter ?
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 09:48 AM
Oct 2018

New people who have registered to vote especially in the democratic party are not in these polls I think there is going to be some surprises on election night. The same pollsters under polled Gallium's polling because they had him in 3rd place he won on new voters who never voted before https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/10/7/1800497/-The-BlueWave-surge-where-it-really-counts-voter-registration

FakeNoose

(32,767 posts)
5. Pennsylvania districts were redrawn this year
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 09:50 AM
Oct 2018

I don't understand how the Washington Post can make any predictions for Pennsylvania based on past performance. The PA gerrymandering was so pervasive that formerly blue counties and districts went for Trump in 2016.

Now the gerrymandering will be held to a minimum, or at least we hope it's been greatly reduced. But we won't know anything until November 6th. It's a whole new ballgame in PA!

still_one

(92,403 posts)
11. a lot of them do that, and I really think that is a flawed assumption, especially based on what the
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 10:56 AM
Oct 2018

country has been going through the last couple of years

BumRushDaShow

(129,486 posts)
6. Since PA was redistricted
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 09:54 AM
Oct 2018

the survey is a bit confusing with their numbering for the PA seats with respect to the "before" and "after". I.e., they are missing a seat here that is expected to flip (new vs old PA-6). Plus the old PA-7 is the new PA-5 (a flip).

Old


New


Still going through it...

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
8. Here we go....The Russians are coming and the Corporate mafia News organinzations
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 10:38 AM
Oct 2018

are there with their talking points from now till election day.
There will be lost votes and everything that goes along with election fraud.

Stand by everyone we are about ready to lose our Democracy....Totally

 

louis c

(8,652 posts)
10. By the way, this is a big lead
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 10:55 AM
Oct 2018

These are contested districts, mostly held by Republicans. The 2014 spread in these district was Republicans by double digits. If the numbers hold up in November, we will get at least 35 new seats.

This is not a generic ballot. The Gerrymandering puts a lot of Democrats in seats that are like 40% Dems (I live in one. MA 6). That will skew the numbers even more toward Dems.

DeminPennswoods

(15,290 posts)
12. LVs
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 11:00 AM
Oct 2018

This poll weighed voting history more heavily than anything else

The sample was stratified by frequency of voting in recent general elections; more regular voters were given a greater chance of selection to increase the sample size of likely voters. The eventual sample was weighted to correct for differences in chances of selection by historical turnout.


That's why these polls show much closer races. The fact is the NRCC has pulled its ad dollars out of PA-17 (Rothfus vs Lamb) and PA-7. They do regular polling that tells them chances of an R win are unlikely.

To me, this poll is probably the worst case scenario for Dems and it's still pretty good news.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Survey of battleground Ho...