Federal Judge Upholds Ohio's Voter Purge Again
Source: Talking Points Memo
By Julie Carr Smyth
October 10, 2018 2:51 pm
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) A federal judge rejected a voting rights groups latest arguments Wednesday that voters were illegally purged from Ohios voting rolls.
U.S. District Judge George C. Smith largely sided with the states arguments defending confirmation notices sent to voters that set off a removal process tied to failure to participate in the election process, in another blow to the A. Phillip Randolph Institute.
The institutes broader argument that Ohios election administration process was unconstitutional lost in the U.S. Supreme Court in June, but the group continued to contest the legality of the notices.
Acknowledging the effort may have been an end run around the Supreme Courts decision and a final attempt to have the previously removed voters reinstated, the court allowed arguments to go forward.
Read more: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/ohio-voter-roll-purge-upheld-again
So who appointed this judge.................yep a fucking racist piece of shit by the name of Ronald Reagan...............who went around and brought forth the libertarian bull shit .............................
Hey Husted do you remember what the supreme court did in Shelby vs Holder....................your an asshole, and the supreme court of right wing Federalist Society POS don't care about the Constitution, or voting..................so go fuck yourself
November 2018 cannot get here fast enough......................vote
diva77
(7,643 posts)C Moon
(12,213 posts)Lonestarblue
(9,996 posts)Is there any way to obtain the names and addresses of voters purged so that they can re-register before the election? Or would that be withheld due to privacy issues? Democrats need a registration group in every state to help voters check that theyre still registered to vote. They probably only need to focus on minority precincts since those are typically the ones where voters are purged. I know its a cost, but, damn, we need every voter.
And how do we know that only voters who havent voted in two elections are really the ones being purged?
red dog 1
(27,805 posts)I'm sending a donation to the A. Philip Randolph Institute
lancelyons
(988 posts)Dems have been asleep at the wheel on this. Worried about what potties people are using and not the future.
BumRushDaShow
(129,047 posts)I have posted this info (from various links) probably a dozen times but will post it again -
How Barack Obama Transformed The Nations Courts
WASHINGTON ― Republicans cannot wait to begin dismantling President Barack Obamas accomplishments, but theres one thing they cant undo, even with full control of Congress and the White House: his judicial legacy.
Obama will leave office with 329 of his judicial nominees confirmed to lifetime posts on federal courts. That includes two U.S. Supreme Court justices and four judges on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, the two most powerful courts in the nation. Because of Obama, Democratic appointees now have a 7-4 advantage on the D.C. panel, and those judges will play a major role in deciding cases during the Trump administration related to environmental regulations, health care, national security, consumer protections and challenges to executive orders.
Obama also tilted the partisan makeup of circuit courts. Nine of the countrys 13 appeals courts now have majority Democratic appointees, compared with just one when he took office in 2009.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/barack-obama-judicial-legacy_us_586c1944e4b0de3a08f9eb1f
Polybius
(15,421 posts)How many have the last five or so had confirmed?
BumRushDaShow
(129,047 posts)By James Downie
December 19, 2014
<...>
Most notably, the GOP determinedly filibustered obviously competent nominees to three open seats on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, preserving the conservative majority on the nations second-highest court. Finally, after years of threatening, Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) went on the Senate floor in November 2013 and invoked the nuclear option, changing the Senate rules to eliminate the filibuster for executive branch and judicial nominees (other than those for the Supreme Court).
A year later, the effect of that change is clear: The 113th Congress confirmed 132 district and circuit court judges, including 89 this year (ed. in 2014). Thats the highest single-year total in 20 years, and the highest two-year total since 1980. (Thats particularly impressive considering that this Congress was one of the least productive in history.) On Tuesday night alone, the Senate confirmed 12 nominees. All this means that the once-lagging Obama has now appointed more judges in his first six years (305) than Reagan, Bill Clinton or George W. Bush. And because Obama has gone out of his way to nominate judges from a wide array of backgrounds, the federal bench is more diverse than ever. All in all, its an extraordinary turnaround, one that both Obama and Reid deserve credit for.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2014/12/19/the-nuclear-option-transforms-obamas-judicial-legacy/
And the above article was written in 2014, so my previous post listed what the final numbers were by the end of Obama's term in 2016.
This is a good site to see the nominees/confirmations past (goes back to 1981) and current - http://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/judicial-vacancies/archive-judicial-vacancies
Polybius
(15,421 posts)I just checked, and as of October 11, 2018, the United States Senate has confirmed 84 Article III judges nominated by Trump. So, that's a slightly better pace than Obama. Of course, Trump has a friendly Senate, and Obama did not for much of his Presidency.
BumRushDaShow
(129,047 posts)Grassley, who chairs that Committee, has made it a point to pretty much torpedo what is known as the "Blue Slip" process, although the defacto "rule" wasn't really formally revoked, but has been essentially ignored by the GOP once they took control again, as they go ranting and raving and trashing the entire Senate deliberative process.
What that means is that traditionally, the chair of the Judiciary would abide by ("courtesy" ) the wishes of the Senators from states that had nominees from their states. I.e., Senators would be asked to return the completed "blue slip" (form letter) that recommends or rejects their approval of that nominee. If the chair received no return of the blue slip, then the nominee would not go forward. If the chair received a rejection blue slip, then the nominee would not go forward. If the chair received blue slip approvals, then the nominee would have a hearing scheduled.
Here is an example (from back when Leahy was Chair of that committee in 2011) -
I literally just heard early this morning that both Diane Feinstein and Kamala Harris have banded together to protest the nomination of 3, 9th Circuit Court Justices from California (the request to review of which is normally done by sending them a "blue slip" for each nominee from their state), who they were not consulted about. I.e., Grassley ignored the process and accepted Drumpf's "last minute" nominees (who were not on the originally-submitted list to them and the committee), as Grassley has completely burned down every bridge imaginable when it comes to Senate rules and decorum.
(as a sidenote as I heard on the radio this morning, the 9th circuit has a total of 29 slots due to all the cases it hears, many of them are usually retired justices who serve as backups, etc. The judges are located in various western states including CA (which is the principal state), AK, AZ, NV, OR, WA. I believe ID is also a covered state)
clementine613
(561 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,047 posts)I don't know how many times DUers must be told that when your party is in the "minority" of a chamber of Congress, then you can try to stall and delay as much as possible (which they HAVE DONE with most of Drumpf's nominees but the RW Politico won't tell you that), but in the end the GOP has MORE VOTES than the Democrats and will jam it ALL through eventually and regardless of Democratic "holds" and other delays that are limited.
Did you not see that with Kavanaugh (which would have happened anyway, EVEN if you took Manchin out of the equation)?
Simple math and Civics 101 just doesn't seem to be something that some DUers "get".
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)"Worried about what potties people are using"
?
No Vested Interest
(5,167 posts)Make sure he never becomes Ohio Lt. governor.
Help Betty Sutton, former D Congresswoman from Ohio, become the next Lt. Governor.
Vote Cordray/Sutton!
ancianita
(36,058 posts)sakabatou
(42,152 posts)secondwind
(16,903 posts)is insanity!
diva77
(7,643 posts)If your deadline hasn't passed, try to go IN PERSON to register if at all possible.
https://www.vote.org/am-i-registered-to-vote/
cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)Instead the real major problem is people not showing up to vote and if we want to win we need to work to get people that otherwise would support Democratic candidates to show up and actually vote when its time and not just once but at every election.