Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

turbinetree

(24,703 posts)
Wed Oct 10, 2018, 04:26 PM Oct 2018

Federal Judge Upholds Ohio's Voter Purge Again

Source: Talking Points Memo

By Julie Carr Smyth
October 10, 2018 2:51 pm
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — A federal judge rejected a voting rights group’s latest arguments Wednesday that voters were illegally purged from Ohio’s voting rolls.

U.S. District Judge George C. Smith largely sided with the state’s arguments defending confirmation notices sent to voters that set off a removal process tied to failure to participate in the election process, in another blow to the A. Phillip Randolph Institute.

The institute’s broader argument that Ohio’s election administration process was unconstitutional lost in the U.S. Supreme Court in June, but the group continued to contest the legality of the notices.

Acknowledging the effort may have been “an end run around the Supreme Court’s decision and a final attempt to have the previously removed voters reinstated,” the court allowed arguments to go forward.

Read more: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/ohio-voter-roll-purge-upheld-again



So who appointed this judge.................yep a fucking racist piece of shit by the name of Ronald Reagan...............who went around and brought forth the libertarian bull shit .............................

Hey Husted do you remember what the supreme court did in Shelby vs Holder....................your an asshole, and the supreme court of right wing Federalist Society POS don't care about the Constitution, or voting..................so go fuck yourself


November 2018 cannot get here fast enough......................vote


19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Lonestarblue

(9,996 posts)
3. It may be too late for this election, but is anyone working to re-register?
Wed Oct 10, 2018, 04:59 PM
Oct 2018

Is there any way to obtain the names and addresses of voters purged so that they can re-register before the election? Or would that be withheld due to privacy issues? Democrats need a registration group in every state to help voters check that they’re still registered to vote. They probably only need to focus on minority precincts since those are typically the ones where voters are purged. I know it’s a cost, but, damn, we need every voter.

And how do we know that only voters who haven’t voted in two elections are really the ones being purged?

 

lancelyons

(988 posts)
5. Thats why Judges make a difference.
Wed Oct 10, 2018, 05:21 PM
Oct 2018

Dems have been asleep at the wheel on this. Worried about what potties people are using and not the future.

BumRushDaShow

(129,047 posts)
6. "Thats why Judges make a difference."
Wed Oct 10, 2018, 07:10 PM
Oct 2018

I have posted this info (from various links) probably a dozen times but will post it again -

01/12/2017 07:00 am ET Updated Jan 12, 2017
How Barack Obama Transformed The Nation’s Courts

WASHINGTON ― Republicans cannot wait to begin dismantling President Barack Obama’s accomplishments, but there’s one thing they can’t undo, even with full control of Congress and the White House: his judicial legacy.

Obama will leave office with 329 of his judicial nominees confirmed to lifetime posts on federal courts. That includes two U.S. Supreme Court justices and four judges on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, the two most powerful courts in the nation. Because of Obama, Democratic appointees now have a 7-4 advantage on the D.C. panel, and those judges will play a major role in deciding cases during the Trump administration related to environmental regulations, health care, national security, consumer protections and challenges to executive orders.

Obama also tilted the partisan makeup of circuit courts. Nine of the country’s 13 appeals courts now have majority Democratic appointees, compared with just one when he took office in 2009.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/barack-obama-judicial-legacy_us_586c1944e4b0de3a08f9eb1f

BumRushDaShow

(129,047 posts)
13. Yes - in fact see this
Thu Oct 11, 2018, 06:10 AM
Oct 2018
The ‘nuclear option’ transforms Obama’s judicial legacy
By James Downie
December 19, 2014

<...>

Most notably, the GOP determinedly filibustered obviously competent nominees to three open seats on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, preserving the conservative majority on the nation’s second-highest court. Finally, after years of threatening, Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) went on the Senate floor in November 2013 and invoked the “nuclear option,” changing the Senate rules to eliminate the filibuster for executive branch and judicial nominees (other than those for the Supreme Court).

A year later, the effect of that change is clear: The 113th Congress confirmed 132 district and circuit court judges, including 89 this year (ed. in 2014). That’s the highest single-year total in 20 years, and the highest two-year total since 1980. (That’s particularly impressive considering that this Congress was one of the least productive in history.) On Tuesday night alone, the Senate confirmed 12 nominees. All this means that the once-lagging Obama has now appointed more judges in his first six years (305) than Reagan, Bill Clinton or George W. Bush. And because Obama has gone out of his way to nominate judges from a wide array of backgrounds, the federal bench is more diverse than ever. All in all, it’s an extraordinary turnaround, one that both Obama and Reid deserve credit for.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2014/12/19/the-nuclear-option-transforms-obamas-judicial-legacy/


And the above article was written in 2014, so my previous post listed what the final numbers were by the end of Obama's term in 2016.

This is a good site to see the nominees/confirmations past (goes back to 1981) and current - http://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/judicial-vacancies/archive-judicial-vacancies

Polybius

(15,421 posts)
14. Thanks for the info
Fri Oct 12, 2018, 11:38 PM
Oct 2018

I just checked, and as of October 11, 2018, the United States Senate has confirmed 84 Article III judges nominated by Trump. So, that's a slightly better pace than Obama. Of course, Trump has a friendly Senate, and Obama did not for much of his Presidency.

BumRushDaShow

(129,047 posts)
15. And as a note to the appointees you mention
Sat Oct 13, 2018, 06:33 AM
Oct 2018

Grassley, who chairs that Committee, has made it a point to pretty much torpedo what is known as the "Blue Slip" process, although the defacto "rule" wasn't really formally revoked, but has been essentially ignored by the GOP once they took control again, as they go ranting and raving and trashing the entire Senate deliberative process.

What that means is that traditionally, the chair of the Judiciary would abide by ("courtesy" ) the wishes of the Senators from states that had nominees from their states. I.e., Senators would be asked to return the completed "blue slip" (form letter) that recommends or rejects their approval of that nominee. If the chair received no return of the blue slip, then the nominee would not go forward. If the chair received a rejection blue slip, then the nominee would not go forward. If the chair received blue slip approvals, then the nominee would have a hearing scheduled.

Here is an example (from back when Leahy was Chair of that committee in 2011) -



I literally just heard early this morning that both Diane Feinstein and Kamala Harris have banded together to protest the nomination of 3, 9th Circuit Court Justices from California (the request to review of which is normally done by sending them a "blue slip" for each nominee from their state), who they were not consulted about. I.e., Grassley ignored the process and accepted Drumpf's "last minute" nominees (who were not on the originally-submitted list to them and the committee), as Grassley has completely burned down every bridge imaginable when it comes to Senate rules and decorum.

(as a sidenote as I heard on the radio this morning, the 9th circuit has a total of 29 slots due to all the cases it hears, many of them are usually retired justices who serve as backups, etc. The judges are located in various western states including CA (which is the principal state), AK, AZ, NV, OR, WA. I believe ID is also a covered state)

BumRushDaShow

(129,047 posts)
19. They really had no choice because they dont control the Senate schedule
Sun Oct 14, 2018, 05:31 AM
Oct 2018

I don't know how many times DUers must be told that when your party is in the "minority" of a chamber of Congress, then you can try to stall and delay as much as possible (which they HAVE DONE with most of Drumpf's nominees but the RW Politico won't tell you that), but in the end the GOP has MORE VOTES than the Democrats and will jam it ALL through eventually and regardless of Democratic "holds" and other delays that are limited.

Did you not see that with Kavanaugh (which would have happened anyway, EVEN if you took Manchin out of the equation)?

Simple math and Civics 101 just doesn't seem to be something that some DUers "get".

No Vested Interest

(5,167 posts)
7. Husted is running for Ohio lieutenant governor, as DeWine's running mate.
Wed Oct 10, 2018, 08:24 PM
Oct 2018

Make sure he never becomes Ohio Lt. governor.
Help Betty Sutton, former D Congresswoman from Ohio, become the next Lt. Governor.
Vote Cordray/Sutton!

secondwind

(16,903 posts)
12. So HOW does a person get back on the rolls to vote, if they have been purged for NOT voting? This
Wed Oct 10, 2018, 09:36 PM
Oct 2018

is insanity!

diva77

(7,643 posts)
16. check out vote.org for registration deadlines & whether you are registered
Sat Oct 13, 2018, 06:07 PM
Oct 2018

If your deadline hasn't passed, try to go IN PERSON to register if at all possible.

https://www.vote.org/am-i-registered-to-vote/

cstanleytech

(26,291 posts)
18. I will be honest and say that I do not think the purge is a major problem.
Sat Oct 13, 2018, 10:43 PM
Oct 2018

Instead the real major problem is people not showing up to vote and if we want to win we need to work to get people that otherwise would support Democratic candidates to show up and actually vote when its time and not just once but at every election.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Federal Judge Upholds Ohi...