Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
Tue Dec 11, 2018, 08:57 AM Dec 2018

Time Magazine Person of the Year: The Guardians

Source: Time Magazine

The stout man with the gray goatee and the gentle demeanor dared to disagree with his country’s government. He told the world the truth about its brutality toward those who would speak out. And he was murdered for it.

Every detail of Jamal Khashoggi’s killing made it a sensation: the time stamp on the surveillance video that captured the Saudi journalist entering his country’s Istanbul consulate on Oct. 2; the taxiway images of the private jets bearing his assassins; the bone saw; the reports of his final words, “I can’t breathe,” recorded on audio as the life was choked from him.

But the crime would not have remained atop the world news for two months if not for the epic themes that Khashoggi himself was ever alert to, and spent his life placing before the public. His death laid bare the true nature of a smiling prince, the utter absence of morality in the Saudi-U.S. alliance and—in the cascade of news feeds and alerts, posts and shares and links—the centrality of the question Khashoggi was killed over: Whom do you trust to tell the story?

Khashoggi put his faith in bearing witness. He put it in the field reporting he had done since youth, in the newspaper editorship he was forced out of and in the columns he wrote from lonely exile. “Must we choose,” he asked in the Washington Post in May, “between movie theaters and our rights as citizens to speak out, whether in support of or critical of our government’s actions?” Khashoggi had fled his homeland last year even though he actually supported much of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s agenda in Saudi Arabia. What irked the kingdom and marked the journalist for death was Khashoggi’s insistence on coming to that conclusion on his own, tempering it with troubling facts and trusting the public to think for itself.

Read more: http://time.com/person-of-the-year-2018-the-guardians/

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Time Magazine Person of the Year: The Guardians (Original Post) erpowers Dec 2018 OP
Fantastic!!! empedocles Dec 2018 #1
Very appropriate and I'm very pleased. hlthe2b Dec 2018 #2
K & R!!! 50 Shades Of Blue Dec 2018 #3
Woohoo! trump thought he was going to get it. brush Dec 2018 #4
If he did get it, he finished 2nd, watoos Dec 2018 #9
I heard recently that the award is for who impacted the world most... brush Dec 2018 #11
That'll make Dotard even more nutso mcar Dec 2018 #5
Excellent pick. Video: demmiblue Dec 2018 #6
It's a lengthy read but well worth it. watoos Dec 2018 #7
This needs to be front and center in the news as far as I'm concerned. llmart Dec 2018 #15
Perfect choice. lilactime Dec 2018 #8
There were many good options, as long as it wasn't Trump JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2018 #10
This article is a must read in its entirety UpInArms Dec 2018 #12
DU, November 23: Person of the year? The press. NT mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2018 #13
What was the point of the voting? oberliner Dec 2018 #14
Sleep in Heavenly Peace. calimary Dec 2018 #16
! Achilleaze Dec 2018 #17
Yeah Gothmog Dec 2018 #18
murdered with the help of tRump and repugs are ok with that elmac Dec 2018 #19
k and r niyad Dec 2018 #20
 

watoos

(7,142 posts)
9. If he did get it, he finished 2nd,
Tue Dec 11, 2018, 09:18 AM
Dec 2018

I would hope that he wouldn't be portrayed in a positive way.

brush

(53,778 posts)
11. I heard recently that the award is for who impacted the world most...
Tue Dec 11, 2018, 09:24 AM
Dec 2018

either positively or negatively. If it had went to someone who impacted it negatively IMO it should gone to Putin, not his flunky.

 

watoos

(7,142 posts)
7. It's a lengthy read but well worth it.
Tue Dec 11, 2018, 09:15 AM
Dec 2018

I only disagreed with one statement in the link; that msnbc was the liberal equivalence to Fox, not even close, besides msnbc isn't liberal.

Excellent choice Time. We are already starting to forget about Khashoggi. I see that Jared Kushner has taken it upon himself to counsel Khashoggi's murderer, MBS, on how to get through this.

llmart

(15,540 posts)
15. This needs to be front and center in the news as far as I'm concerned.
Tue Dec 11, 2018, 10:45 AM
Dec 2018

"Jared Kushner has taken it upon himself to counsel Khashoggi's murderer, MBS, on how to get through this."

Tie his lily white ass to the murderer every single day until he's indicted.

UpInArms

(51,284 posts)
12. This article is a must read in its entirety
Tue Dec 11, 2018, 09:31 AM
Dec 2018

I keep reading ... and think .... this is most important

“We have an era from the ’70s until about 2000, when both Democrats and Republicans were becoming more skeptical of the press,” says Jonathan Ladd, director of the American Institutional Confidence Poll at Georgetown University. “Then in the past 18 to 20 years, the partisan divide is growing, where most of the continuing decline is on the Republican side.”

The division coincides with the growth of partisan cable news networks. In 1996, Fox News Channel was founded on the assumption that the national media reflected the liberal inclinations of journalists working for it. And surveys did show a lean to the left in their personal politics. Fox was not the first news outlet to thrive by offering news viewers the satisfaction of a shared view of the world—MSNBC, its liberal counterpart, premiered four months earlier—but it was the most strikingly partisan in a television landscape that historically tried not to be.

When TV arrived in homes via physically scarce airwaves, a license to broadcast was deemed a public trust, and the Federal Communications Commission enforced the Fairness Doctrine, which required stations to cover public controversies, and to include more than one side. The hundreds of channels brought by cable rendered the scarcity premise obsolete as justification for regulation (the Fairness Doctrine was repealed in 1987), and the fire hose that is the Internet has washed away the last traces. So it was that TV news went from being a blandly unifying force, confined largely to half-hour nightly newscasts, to a constant companion nudging the country into partisan camps.


And, then, as I read on, I find everything else is so true ... and so important

The Internet also siphoned away ad revenue—roughly 60% of every digital advertising dollar in the U.S. now goes to Google or Facebook. In recent years, news outlets relied heavily on the platforms to steer audience their way, and in order to find favor on Facebook’s algorithms or a Google search, stories were tweaked for grabby headlines or to elevate the emotional angle. The net effect: fewer and fewer people are actually out reporting—the number of journalists has dropped from 114,000 to 88,000 from 2009 to 2017—while more and more stories recast the same facts in a slightly different way, to provoke reposting on social media.

In the U.S., local newsrooms are disappearing fastest. Since 2004, the U.S. lost nearly 1,800 newspapers, the UNC Center for Innovation and Sustainability in Local Media found in an October report. Half of the 3,143 counties in the U.S. now have just one newspaper, usually a small weekly. Nearly 200 counties have no newspaper. And “between 1,300 and 1,400 communities that had newspapers of their own in 2004 now have no local news coverage at all.”


Thank you, erpowers, for posting ... and thank Time for really getting it.
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
14. What was the point of the voting?
Tue Dec 11, 2018, 10:03 AM
Dec 2018

1. BTS
2. Planet Earth
3. Thai Cave Dwellers
4. MBS
5. Moon Jae-in
6. Undocumented Children
7. Michelle Obama
8. Jair Bolsonaro
9. Christine Blasey Ford
10. Robert Mueller
11. Colin Kaepernick
12. Simone Biles
13. Serena Williams
14. Meghan Markle
15. Justin Trudeau
16. Pope Francis
17. Stacey Abrams
18. Donald Trump
19. Lady Gaga
20. Ariana Grande
21. Donald Glover
22. Aly Raisman
23. Angela Merkel
24. Beyonce
25. Elon Musk
26. Maxine Waters
27. Kamala Harris

That's everyone who got more than 1 percent in the reader poll.

 

elmac

(4,642 posts)
19. murdered with the help of tRump and repugs are ok with that
Tue Dec 11, 2018, 12:13 PM
Dec 2018

the GOP and all who voted for them are terrorists.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Time Magazine Person of t...