Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

turbinetree

(24,701 posts)
Thu Dec 13, 2018, 11:45 AM Dec 2018

Two killed in accident at Antarctic research station

Source: The Guardian

Technicians from US contractor had been working on fire-suppression system at the McMurdo scientific outpost on Ross Island

Two fire technicians at a US scientific station in Antarctica have died after being found unconscious, according to the National Science Foundation (NSF).

The two technicians had been working on a fire-suppression system at McMurdo station on Ross Island, the foundation said on Wednesday. It said they were found on the floor by a helicopter pilot who had landed after spotting what appeared to be smoke from the building.

Both were taken from the building and given CPR. One died at the scene. The other was flown to a clinic and pronounced dead shortly after. It happened on Tuesday eastern US time at a generator building that powers a radio transmitter near the McMurdo station.

They were employed by a Virginia-based subcontractor, PAE , which provides logistical support to the US Antartica program that is managed by the foundation. NSF said it was not immediately releasing any personal information about the pair. The deaths were under investigation and would be reviewed by a panel convened by the foundation.

NSF spokesman Peter West said the deaths were not being treated as suspicious.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/12/antarctica-two-technicians-dead-mcmurdo-station-ross-island

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

LiberalArkie

(15,715 posts)
3. Halon used to be used at where I worked, but was changed out (at great expense)
Thu Dec 13, 2018, 12:08 PM
Dec 2018

because Halon is a CFC.

We had a interesting procedure at our location. If the fire alarm went off and personnel was in the switch room, a person had about 30 seconds to get to a big button beside the doors and push and hold it in until it was confirmed that there was indeed a fire and not a false alarm. FM-200 bottles we were told are very expensive.

turbinetree

(24,701 posts)
4. When I was working in aviation on a project for the Air Force in California
Thu Dec 13, 2018, 12:15 PM
Dec 2018

this guy came into the hanger with a cigarette just blazing away.............the sensors picked up the smoke and heat located by the access doors...................and then all hell broke loose, halon started dropping from the outlets, sirens going off........and we are are all scrambling to get out of the hanger................what a mess, and then to top it all off we got soaked with fire retardant foam.................................dropping from the ceiling, spraying onto the floors.

Had to wait two days, tug the plane out of the hanger, wash it down, check all of the instruments, everything............wash down the hanger...............they had to recharge and reset the system for the next snafu...........or Fubar .....................

No one got hurt...............everyone had to go back into training, what a mess..............

LiberalArkie

(15,715 posts)
5. Yea, they still recommend Halon on airplanes, but it has to be recycled stuff, can't be manufactured
Thu Dec 13, 2018, 12:23 PM
Dec 2018

We also had a dry water system that if the gas did not put out the fire then a person had to turn a valve to charge the water sprinklers.

Spending a million on firing off the FM-200 was nothing to giving about 20 million+ worth of electronics a bath.

Any decision the person made when the fire alarm went off was an employment termination opportunity.

sdfernando

(4,935 posts)
7. FM-200 should be breathable and not harmful to humans
Thu Dec 13, 2018, 12:50 PM
Dec 2018

Most modern systems since Halon are breathable. I've worked in data centers with FM-200, Inergen, and Argonite. All are safe for humans....although the releasing of the gas into a room is pretty damned dramatic.

Of course, we don't know what system (if any) they have installed so we can only speculate at this point.

Scruffy1

(3,256 posts)
8. It will displace the oxygen, I think.
Thu Dec 13, 2018, 12:56 PM
Dec 2018

CO2 will,too. You have 2 minutes to live once the oxygen content drops below 17%. Old joke among building mechanical people is always make sure your cot is higher than the alarm.

sdfernando

(4,935 posts)
9. FM-200 works by removing heat from the flames thus supressing the fire, not by denying
Thu Dec 13, 2018, 01:13 PM
Dec 2018

the flames oxygen. As such it is safe, breathable and no obscured vision.

Inergen & Argonite work to lower the O2 level below 12% which starves the fire but is still safe for humans.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Two killed in accident at...