not the other way around!!

because she is one of the few who can change the right wing narrative. That's why they fear her.

Maybe she should sue? That's the bow tie boy, Tucker Carlson, isn't it? Aren't his sponsors dropping him? Maybe more should.

because they support 260 of those stations by broadcasting sports on them.

and he attacks warren and kamala harris and pelosi and any other dem who sticks their neck out. that's been going of for 30 years and it's worked on a lot good people.

he's the guy who VP pence blowed on radio yesterday and if any of those universities was pushed to merely discuss the stupidity of supporting those stations others would follow and advertisers would head for the hills.

Oops — never mind. Clicked on the link. They are — question answered.

regent elections - that then vote to privatize the university!

Letter writing response to these universities? If not it would be interesting to see the responses you may (or may not) get. I know this is something that you are passionate about, having seen your previous posts about it. It would be interesting to read any replies to the letters.

absurd. try it.

meanwhile student groups are getting spit on by their own administrations as the admins crap on their own mission statements

these radio stations are the only thing keeping these assholes in the white house

Scared they are of her, or none of this would be happening now. She's a smart , and very articulate young lady that has really good new idea's , especially raising taxes on the wealthy. They're scared that idea will be very popular and may happen, and should. I like her a lot for her new idea's , and standing up against others attacking her, and don't need another person not willing to stand up to attacks by them. Hope she gets more support , she's got mine. We need more women, more minorities in OUR Congress and our government.

information to damage the reputation of the Congress Person, with what I believe is malice intent

All I see is feet anyway. Whats the scandal?

Apparently if you look real close and squint your eyes just right, the woman's breasts are visible in the reflection.

Even if it were a genuine picture of AOC (or part of her, I guess), so what? She's an adult who can take such pictures as much as she likes. I'd reserve my scrutiny for the person or persons who got hold of it and passed it on without her consent, if it were genuine.

Still on Reddit, but as a debunked photo. I had to go back to see what you were talking about. I sure miss out on a lot if folks can see this kind of stuff normally!! I had to really spread out the image to see it.

And youre right, its not obscene.

But this is the beginning. As the next generation starts running for office, their WHOLE LIVES have been online, unlike folks over
30-40. Just think of what we're going to see in 2030 from old FB posts or Instagram. From when the candidate was 19, now 40s and running for Senate.
If you're planning a political career, better be clean from age 12 now.

They'll find out just what people mean when they say that the Internet is forever. I avoid social media like the plague because I don't want my life to be accessible to every random schmo on the Internet. And also because I don't delude myself into thinking that my life is particularly interesting to anyone.

A "deep fake" is a video with YOUR face on it that looks real. I imagine that an expert can tell, like with photoshop, but once its out there, a TON of people will believe it TRUE.
Its being done right now with movie stars on porn star's bodies doing what porn stars do. But just imagine a candidates face on the face of someone snorting coke in a "hidden video" or some such thing as that. It could be anything.
People need to be ready for this, because the radicals are not above using it.
Google it and you'll see what I mean.

As Jordan Peele demonstrated:

conservative outlet.

It is a racist, sexist rag founded by Tucker Carlson.

Whille politicans generallly do not sue for defamation because they need to show that the false information was made with 'actual malice', I think in this case it CAN be shown that the publication used knowingly false information with malice intent.

I don't know if she would sue or not for defamation, but I think she has a case

At a minimum she could force Carlson's hand to denounce The Daily Caller.

These people are mentally ill

from swiftboating John Kerry to the shit they pull everyday.

An excited yelp that they used to end him. juxtaposed over the russian illegit? Literally nothing. Was then, is now.

Showed them all to be pure idiots.

That we let it happen. A yell....was too informal and disgraceful from a gop stand-point, to allow our man to serve. Wow.

But I would not call them mentally ill.

Nothing untoward meant by the use of that phrase. I hope she has some solid advisors because now is the time for her to be choosing her battles wisely.

....because she doesn't have the proper amount of achievements under her belt?

RW media has been out of control for a very long time. The lefts passive approach to the situation has been a major problem. Like it doesn't matter that 98% of political talk radio is conservative, or that Fox News can lie with impunity with virtually no push back.

Good grief.

Last time I checked, everyone was entitled to their dignity.

<rolling eyeballs>

Hilarious that I should suggest that she needs experience.

Regardless of the additional irrelevancy of who you want this to be about.

If you have a problem, then you have a problem.

It is an extremely important trait and it is why Republicans fear her so much. She is one of the very few who can change the corporate controlled right wing narratives. Al Franken had that ability that's why they got rid of him. Speaker Pelosi has that ability, she can call a press conference and they will come.

Why does she have to choose her battles wisely? Can't she be herself and fight for what she believes in?

She is trying to change the right wing narrative on climate change, should she back off that? She is bringing up the real problem with our economy, income inequality. Should she back off of that? Why does she need some advisors? What about the rest of the freshman class, does the same go for them?

If she doesn't want to be strategic then there will soon be another flavor of the day.

You're revealing a lot more about yourself than you intended to.

And while you're at it tell me what I am intending, what you're going to do about it, and who appointed you to be whatever it is that you claim to be.

I'm waiting.

Too much coffee today?

herself against a disgusting smear campaign?

I just don't get the feeling that a picture of someone's toes in a bathtub is going to hurt her.

You can choose to battle with me about it if you wish. Go for it and see where it gets you.

I didn't view the photo in question, but I have no doubts about what they're clearly trying to accomplish.

2. If you want to make an OP that details her lack of "achievements under her belt", you're more than welcome to do so. I'm sure it will get loads of traction. Have a wonderful day!

Do it here and now if you have a case, or if you have decency you can apologize.

Poster posted his opinion, his case was stated. You don't like it...so be it. Asking for an apology and equating that with decency...really?

why your allegation she needs to pick and choose battles is relevant to her response to an inaccurate nude picture?

I get it if you choose not to... it can be difficult to support our own words with rational arguments sometimes.

My honest opinion isn't good enough for you so tell me what you would rather hear.

<rolling eyeballs>

AO-C is their designate.

Might as well spout the other talking points about AOC: She needs to take it slow, respect her elders and "learn the job." But only because you are concerned about her success.

Congrats, you made good time.

there's one fairly important achievement.

That is defamation, they knew it was a fake photo.

Maybe not. She could also get into a pooh* flinging match with them and the RWNJ's would love nothing more than her to be diverted from the job she's been assigned by her constitutes, and focus her valuable energy on crap entanglement.



* Not Pooh, just to clarify.

repubes are the lowest

It will take continual confrontation to begin to root out this omnipresent disease.

for AOC or anyone, in any field...

There is a destructive psychology attached to it.. difficult to explain but..
It is always there in some way.

Or am I wrong?

Says plenty about “The Daily Choler”, too.

Link to tweet

and give her a ton of free publicity.