U.S. added 213,000 private-sector jobs in January, ADP says
Source: MarketWatch
U.S. added 213,000 private-sector jobs in January, ADP says
Published: Jan 30, 2019 10:28 a.m. ET
Steady hiring suggests U.S. economy enters 2019 on strong note
By JEFFRY BARTASH REPORTER
The numbers: Companies in the U.S. added 213,000 jobs in January, ADP reported Wednesday, another strong reading that suggests little letdown in a steadily growing economy. ... Wall Street economists had forecast an increase of 174,000. ... ADP trimmed its original estimate of new jobs in December to 263,000 from 271,000.
{snip the chart, which will appear below}
What happened: Big companies added 66,000 new jobs in January, midsize firms filled 84,000 jobs and small businesses increased employment by 63,000.
White-collar professional jobs increased by 46,000 and health care was not far behind, but gains were also strong for blue-collar work in manufacturing (33,000) and construction (35,000).
Economists use the figures from ADP, the payroll processor for millions of American workers, to get a sense of how many new jobs the government's employment report is likely to show a few days later. These two reports sometimes vary significantly month to month, though they move in the same direction over time.
Read more: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/213000-private-sector-jobs-created-in-january-adp-says-2019-01-30
https://www.adpemploymentreport.com/2019/January/NER/NER-January-2019.aspx
Total Employment
Change in Nonfarm Private Employment
[CHART] Change in Nonfarm Private Employment
Historical Trend
Change in Total Nonfarm Private Employment
[CHART] Historical Trend - Change in Total Nonfarm Private Employment
Change By Company Size
Change in Total Nonfarm Private Employment by Company Size
[CHART] Change in Total Nonfarm Private Employment by Company Size
at140
(6,110 posts)Sure, let us make the top 10% more rich. They own 90% of stocks.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,613 posts)By Louis Jacobson on Tuesday, September 18th, 2018 at 2:02 p.m.
....
The accompanying graph details the "distribution of stock ownership by wealth percentile," specifically 84 percent for the "top 10 percent," 9.3 percent for the "next 10 percent" and 6.7 percent for the "bottom 80 percent." ... The data in the graph stems from a peer-reviewed academic paper. However, when we took a closer look, we found the data in the graph doesnt directly support the claim that "most Americans dont own stocks." In fact, the actual data on that question shows that a small majority of Americans do have a stake in the stock market.
Stock value vs. stock reach
The data in the graph comes from a paper published in November 2017 by New York University professor Edward N. Wolff.
....
Khanna uses a bar graph that highlights the imbalance in the value of stock holdings, but his headline claim is about the reach of stock ownership throughout the population. Those are two different things. ... When we contacted Wolff, he agreed that Khannas headline was "wrong." ... So what does the data show on the reach of stock ownership? Its a bit wider than Khanna suggests.
Even if you dont own or trade individual stocks, theres a decent chance you have a 401(k) account or an Individual Retirement Account or belong to a pension fund that is invested in stocks. ... "Many individuals have an indirect interest in the stock market by means of their claims on pension funds that own stocks and use these stock positions to fund pension payments," said Hendrik Bessembinder, a professor at Arizona State Universitys W.P. Carey School of Business.
A once-every-three-years study by the Federal Reserve Board found that in 2016, 51.9 percent of families owned stocks, either directly or as part of a fund. ... And in 2017, Gallup found that 54 percent of respondents owned stocks either directly or as part of a fund. ... Those findings show a majority owning stocks a modest majority, but still a majority.
....
at140
(6,110 posts)And yes, I do have some bones being thrown in in my 403-B by the stock market.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,613 posts)are still dependent on the fortunes of the stock market, if they expect a pension when they retire.
Pension fund managers are not putting all the money with which they have been entrusted in the bank. They have in shares of Apple, Boeing, Caterpillar,...
So, if you're a member of the IBEW, say, the wellbeing of your pension depends on the wellbeing of stocks.
at140
(6,110 posts)because I get no pension except social security and that is not dependent on stocks as far as I know.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,613 posts)Thanks for writing. Stay warm.
at140
(6,110 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)...or just filling in until they went back to work?
IronLionZion
(45,534 posts)But there is no data collected on that. And there are probably fewer people interested in applying for government jobs because of the threat of future shutdowns.