Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,937 posts)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:41 PM Feb 2019

U.S. Supreme Court rules for Texas death row inmate for second time

Source: Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday for a second time ruled in favor of a black death row inmate from Texas whose lawyers have said is intellectually disabled and therefore exempt from capital punishment.

The high court ruled 6-3 that a Texas appeals court in June 2018 did not consider the case in the correct manner when the matter returned to it following the justices’ first intervention in 2017.

Bobby Moore, 59, was convicted at age 20 of fatally shooting an elderly grocery store clerk during a 1980 robbery in Houston. He won his previous case at the high court in 2017 when the justices ruled 5-3 that he should get another chance to show evidence of his disability.

The unsigned ruling said that the Texas court’s ruling that left the death sentence intact “rests upon analysis too much of which too closely resembles what we previously found improper.”

U.S. FEBRUARY 19, 2019 / 9:59 AM / UPDATED 2 HOURS AGO
Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham



Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-deathpenalty/u-s-supreme-court-rules-for-texas-death-row-inmate-for-second-time-idUSKCN1Q81TF



Short article. No more at link yet.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Supreme Court rules for Texas death row inmate for second time (Original Post) Eugene Feb 2019 OP
The Socks of Scalia would have let the execution go forward.. Princess Turandot Feb 2019 #1
Which means wryter2000 Feb 2019 #3
Roberts is somewhat like Kennedy. Corporate friendly, NYC Liberal Feb 2019 #8
If Roberts has an appreciation for history Cirque du So-What Feb 2019 #9
Too bad they didn't put as much thought into a condemned prisoner's right to freedom Panich52 Feb 2019 #2
This Christian agrees with you wryter2000 Feb 2019 #4
Same here. nt oldsoftie Feb 2019 #6
Funny how these "intellectually disabled" arguments are never the FIRST defense. oldsoftie Feb 2019 #5
You would have to ask their lawyers. Cold War Spook Feb 2019 #7

wryter2000

(46,076 posts)
3. Which means
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 02:17 PM
Feb 2019

They were the three. And Roberts and Kavanaugh voted with the liberals.

I have hope for Roberts, to tell you the truth. He voted for the ACA. This is "his" court, and he may not want it to be a debacle.

Cirque du So-What

(25,962 posts)
9. If Roberts has an appreciation for history
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 03:52 PM
Feb 2019

he will recall that many nazi jurists received life sentences in the (Nuremburg) Judges' trial.

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
2. Too bad they didn't put as much thought into a condemned prisoner's right to freedom
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:56 PM
Feb 2019

of religion. They recently decided a Christian priest was sufficient for final counsel even though the condemned wasn't Christian.

As an atheist, I see this as ignoring the Establishment Clause and favoring a Christian theocratic state, just as with Hobby Lobby.

oldsoftie

(12,583 posts)
5. Funny how these "intellectually disabled" arguments are never the FIRST defense.
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 02:33 PM
Feb 2019

Its always pulled out as a last resort. And in SO many cases. Which is an insult to the truly disabled, who are very, very rarely violent people.
Guilty or not?

 

Cold War Spook

(1,279 posts)
7. You would have to ask their lawyers.
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 02:55 PM
Feb 2019

If they are mentally disabled I doubt that they are making the decisions.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. Supreme Court rules ...