White House readies panel to assess if climate change poses a national security threat
Source: Washington Post
Health & Science
White House readies panel to assess if climate change poses a national security threat
By Juliet Eilperin and Missy Ryan
February 20 at 5:00 AM
The White House is working to assemble a panel to assess whether climate change poses a national security threat, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post, a conclusion that federal intelligence agencies have affirmed several times since President Trump took office.
The proposed Presidential Committee on Climate Security, which would be established by executive order, is being spearheaded by William Happer, a National Security Council senior director. Happer, an emeritus professor of physics at Princeton University, has said that carbon emissions linked to climate change should be viewed as an asset rather than a pollutant.
The initiative represents the Trump administrations most recent attempt to question the findings of federal scientists and experts on climate change and comes less than three weeks after Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats delivered a worldwide threat assessment that identified it as a significant security risk.
In late November, Trump dismissed a government report finding that global warming is intensifying and poses a major threat the U.S. economy, saying, I dont see it. (1) Last month, his nominee to head the Environmental Protection Agency, acting administrator Andrew Wheeler, testified that he did not see climate change as one of the worlds pressing challenges.
....
Juliet Eilperin is The Washington Post's senior national affairs correspondent, covering how the new administration is transforming a range of U.S. policies and the federal government itself. She is the author of two books one on sharks and another on Congress, not to be confused with each other and has worked for The Post since 1998. Follow https://twitter.com/eilperin
Missy Ryan writes about the Pentagon, military issues and national security for The Washington Post. She joined The Post in 2014 from Reuters, where she reported on U.S. national security and foreign policy issues. She has reported from Iraq, Egypt, Libya, Lebanon, Yemen, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Mexico, Peru, Argentina and Chile. Follow https://twitter.com/missy_ryan
(1) https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-on-climate-change-people-like-myself-we-have-very-high-levels-of-intelligence-but-were-not-necessarily-such-believers/2018/11/27/722f0184-f27e-11e8-aeea-b85fd44449f5_story.html
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/white-house-readies-panel-to-assess-if-climate-change-poses-a-national-security-threat/2019/02/19/ccc8b29e-3396-11e9-af5b-b51b7ff322e9_story.html
David Fahrenthold Retweeted
https://twitter.com/Fahrenthold
The White House is readying a panel to assess if climate change poses a national security threat, @eilperin and @missy_ryan report
Link to tweet
Juliet Eilperin Retweeted
https://twitter.com/eilperin
White House climate change panel to be led William Happer, a National Security Council official who: - Is not a climatologist - Argued C02 emissions are good - Took $ from a coal company to testify at a PUC meeting @eilperin @missy_ryan
Link to tweet
SCOOP: U.S. intelligence agencies have said repeatedly, including last month, that #ClimateChange represents a security threat. Now a WH aide who has praised CO2 is readying a panel to assess if it really poses a risk. W/ @missy_ryan
Link to tweet
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Clash City Rocker
(3,402 posts)Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)Climate change poses immediate risks to national security and will have broad and costly impacts on the way the US military carries out its missions, the Pentagon said in a new report on the impact of climate change released on 13 October.
The Defense Department said in the report, described as a Climate Change Adaptation Roadmap," that it has begun to boost its "resilience" and ensure mission readiness is not compromised in the face of rising sea levels, increasing regularity of natural disasters, and food and water shortages in the developing world.
In a statement, US Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel called global warming a threat multiplier, saying rising seas and increasing numbers of severe weather events could exacerbate the dangers posed by threats ranging from infectious disease to terrorism:
In two months, the United Nations will convene countries from around the world here in Peru to discuss climate change. Defense leaders must be part of this global discussion. We must be clear-eyed about the security threats presented by climate change, and we must be pro-active in addressing them.
Christiana Figueres, UNFCCC Executive Secretary, said in response to the report:
There is no doubt that runaway climate change threatens the long term national security of many countries as well as the overall stability of the world.
Military leaders will be faced with ever more tough decisions in terms of providing humanitarian assistance in the face of extreme weather events and disruptions to their own supply chains while coping with declining defense budgets in many parts of the globe. It is therefore critical that military leaders become aware of the risks and start to engage in providing solutions. I welcome the clear statement to this effect from Secretary Hagel.
</snip>
Lulu KC
(2,574 posts)Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)Lonestarblue
(10,095 posts)This one will find that climate change is not causing any problems. Proceed to pollute at will.
Bayard
(22,172 posts)So, so, stupid and short-sighted. Too bad the Mar-a-lago golf course won't flood. That would be an environmental catastrophe of major proportion.
DavidDvorkin
(19,493 posts)Or it will be rewritten by some political hacks and then released.
Lulu KC
(2,574 posts)There is a lot about this on record.
For second time this year, I'm thinking, "Military Coup? Would that be an improvement?"
MBS
(9,688 posts)I confess that I've fantasized about this more than once.
I am so so sick of the lies, the greed, the defiant denial of facts, the defiant ignorance. Time is of the essence in addressing climate change. We simply don't have time for idiocy and shortsightedness right now.
machoneman
(4,012 posts)MissMillie
(38,583 posts)dreamed up by China...
So are they going to decide if the hoax is a threat or if climate change is both real and a threat?
And how much tax-payer money are they going to spend on this panel, given the fact that the DoD did this years ago?
tclambert
(11,087 posts)And maybe some executive from a coal mining company.