U.S. Supreme Court rules credit repair firms can force arbitration
Source: Los Angeles Times
A 1996 law sought to protect struggling consumers from businesses promising to improve their credit rating, and specifically gave customers the right to sue any firm in violation.
But the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that credit repair companies could block such lawsuits and instead force disgruntled customers into binding arbitration if they had agreed to such a provision in the fine print of their agreements.
The 8-1 decision is another in a string of high court rulings in recent years that have backed an arbitration clause over a customer's right to file a lawsuit.
... "This Supreme Court is just steam-rolling over the American civil justice system and throwing consumers to the wolves," said Doug Heller, executive director of Consumer Watchdog, an education and advocacy group.
Read more: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-forced-arbitration-20120111,0,3901221.story
Bozita
(26,955 posts)Outfuckingrageous
happyslug
(14,779 posts)harun
(11,348 posts)SixthSense
(829 posts)we get yet another layer of crooks
when does the madness end?
Stuart G
(38,445 posts)Is that it??
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Lance_Boyle
(5,559 posts)I remain baffled at how people expect "I didn't understand the contract I signed" to be a valid reason to escape it.
izquierdista
(11,689 posts)It is an ultimatum. A contract is the result of a negotiation between two parties. When a corporation presents a piece of paper approved by their legal department for a customer's signature, it should be called what it is, an ultimatum, not a contract.
hack89
(39,171 posts)it was definitely a take it or leave it deal.
Contract has a specific legal meaning.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Hawkowl
(5,213 posts)Because of the Supreme Court appointments! Oh, wait.... My bad