Trump administration proposes overtime pay expansion
Source: Reuters
(Reuters) - The U.S. Department of Labor issued a long-awaited proposal on Thursday to extend mandatory overtime pay to a million more workers, far fewer than an Obama administration rule that was struck down by a federal judge.
Currently, salaried workers are automatically entitled to overtime pay only if they earn less than $23,660 a year, a figure set in 2004. The proposal released on Thursday would raise the threshold to $35,308.
The Labor Department in 2016 doubled the salary threshold to about $47,000, extending mandatory overtime pay to about 4 million U.S. workers.
But a federal judge in Texas ruled the following year that the ceiling was set so high that it could sweep in some management workers who are supposed to be exempt from overtime pay protections. Business groups and 21 Republican-led states had sued to challenge the 2016 rule.
-snip-
BUSINESS NEWS MARCH 7, 2019 / 6:53 PM / UPDATED 2 HOURS AGO
Daniel Wiessner
2 MIN READ
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-overtime/trump-administration-proposes-overtime-pay-expansion-idUSKCN1QO2UW
SunSeeker
(51,726 posts)MichMan
(11,978 posts)SunSeeker
(51,726 posts)An employee can't set their own hours. The whole justification of exempting "salaried" employees is that they can set their own hours, so after days of working late, they can decide to spend days leaving early. But that really only applied to the boss, the CEO. No employees have that kind of autonomy. The exemption was a scam from day one.
There is a huge difference between an employee and an officer, MichMan. By definition an employee is an individual who provides labor to a company or another person, while an officer directs that person's labor and has a position of authority in a hierarchical organization.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,902 posts)As someone who worked lots of overtime in my life, all of which I was paid for, I would be in a constant state of rage had I not been eligible for overtime, despite the long hours I worked.
If you are not in a position to effectively say, No, then you should always get the overtime pay.
One of the things that is very wrong with our culture is that people are expected to live to work, to give everything to the job, never mind family or personal life. And that's totally fucked. Work should come second, at best, to living.
I am fortunate in that I figured that out many years ago, that I was not my job. And it came about because I started a volunteer stint at the Natural History Museum of the Smithsonian. Before doing that I identified myself totally with my job. During the docent training I quickly understood that I was not my job. I was a person who did that job. It transformed me. And to this day I will argue with people about this.
SunSeeker
(51,726 posts)No one ever lay on their deathbed and said, "I wish I had spent more time at work."
MichMan
(11,978 posts)Last edited Fri Mar 8, 2019, 09:45 AM - Edit history (1)
I disagree with your definition of what level of employees should receive overtime. There are many levels of employees from low lever supervisor to high level middle management. Not all of them should be eligible for overtime pay.
Games can go into overtime periods and as far as I know they don't get paid any extra. Pretty sure they don't get to set their own hours either.
"Sorry coach, can't play the big game on Sunday, made other plans "
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)Did they accidentally do something right?