Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:09 PM Sep 2012

House passes revamped Stolen Valor Act

Source: CNN

House passes revamped Stolen Valor Act
By Larry Shaughnessy, CNN Pentagon Producer
September 13, 2012 -- Updated 2357 GMT (0757 HKT)

Washington (CNN) -- The U.S. House of Representatives Thursday overwhelmingly passed a new version of the Stolen Valor Act, a bill aimed at people who lie about receiving military medals and then attempt to profit from the deception.

The first version of the Stolen Valor Act was struck down by the Supreme Court as a violation of the First Amendment.

Justices dismiss law making lying about military honors a crime

The bill focuses not on people who lie about having medals they didn't earn, but on any profits they make from lying about the medals, which is essentially criminal fraud.

Rep. Joe Heck (R-Nevada) sponsored the new bill. His office issued a release saying the bill passed by a vote of 410-3.

Read more: http://edition.cnn.com/2012/09/13/politics/stolen-valor-act/index.html

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House passes revamped Stolen Valor Act (Original Post) Judi Lynn Sep 2012 OP
Spam deleted by Paulie (MIR Team) maratmuradyan Sep 2012 #1
The law needs to also include campaign decorations jmowreader Sep 2012 #2
Which is odd because many posts have a SAL that is pretty inclusive... Earth_First Sep 2012 #6
What happened to the Repeal Obamacare votes? I thought that was all they did. nt valerief Sep 2012 #3
Who were the 3 who voted against it? Archae Sep 2012 #4
30+ did not vote Angry Dragon Sep 2012 #9
Too bad. I guess we'll continue to deal with 3-4 times as many "Viet Nam veterans" ... TahitiNut Sep 2012 #5
I have to agree, I happen to be a Navy Vet. Never been in official war zone. However... Katashi_itto Sep 2012 #7
I, and a LOT of others, did my damnedest to blend in and not be obvious ... TahitiNut Sep 2012 #11
Thank you and your generation Victor_c3 Sep 2012 #16
I appreciate that. TahitiNut Sep 2012 #26
My father was stationed in Okinawa during the tail end of Vietnam Earth_First Sep 2012 #8
Actually... rexcat Sep 2012 #10
Everyone who served, served. Robb Sep 2012 #14
See... this is what's so fucking annoying about it. TahitiNut Sep 2012 #15
I never said that your annoyance dishonored my service... rexcat Sep 2012 #17
Q.E.D. TahitiNut Sep 2012 #25
Different service...but the trust thing is relevant rppper Sep 2012 #18
LOL glacierbay Sep 2012 #12
those who have served fade away icarusxat Sep 2012 #20
Oh I didn't mean for it to sound the way it did glacierbay Sep 2012 #24
yeah, i got a brother like that. mopinko Sep 2012 #13
Because the House is just soooooooooooooo concerned about fraud! MotherPetrie Sep 2012 #19
Isn't fraud already illegal? NYC Liberal Sep 2012 #21
Are they jealous? I'll bet none of them or their kids ever served a day in any military service. judesedit Sep 2012 #22
Lying about fighti in VietNam or any other conflict shows the amount of respect for or guilt someone judesedit Sep 2012 #23
Not often, these days, that I can agree with a Republican panzerfaust Sep 2012 #27

jmowreader

(50,559 posts)
2. The law needs to also include campaign decorations
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:15 PM
Sep 2012

A "campaign decoration" is an award whose only criteria is having served in a combat area, such as the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal. This needs to go in there to keep wannabes from joining clubs like the VFW. (The VFW is very skilled at weeding out the wannabes--you need a discharge certificate with a campaign medal on it to get in the VFW--but the VFW isn't the only one of these clubs out there.)

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
6. Which is odd because many posts have a SAL that is pretty inclusive...
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:39 PM
Sep 2012

If one really wanted to join a VFW, it's not as difficult as one would imagine.

TahitiNut

(71,611 posts)
5. Too bad. I guess we'll continue to deal with 3-4 times as many "Viet Nam veterans" ...
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:31 PM
Sep 2012

... as actually served in-country. There are fewer than 750,000 of us left alive, and easily more than 2 million liars. Many, of course, are Viet Nam Era veterans who fought the Viet Cong in Oklahoma or Germany. It's annoying as hell.

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
7. I have to agree, I happen to be a Navy Vet. Never been in official war zone. However...
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:40 PM
Sep 2012

I can barely walk for tripping "Vietnam Vets"

TahitiNut

(71,611 posts)
11. I, and a LOT of others, did my damnedest to blend in and not be obvious ...
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:58 PM
Sep 2012

... during my first years back. It wasn't pleasant when coworkers were "amused" at my startle response to sudden loud noises. They'd slam a door or drop something and watch me get half-ways under my desk before I remembered where I was. I can't even count the number of times I was TOLD how misguided I was or how stupid I was for not moving to Canada ... just across the river from Detroit. Dealing with a mild case of PTSD (which wasn't really known about) and the "joy" of having returned to discover my wife of one year staying overnight with her lover -- and the annulment I obtained -- it just wasn't an easy time in the 70s. Thank Goddess I met some good people -- one gal in particular -- who were REAL '60s types' (not faddists) and gave me unconditional acceptance and support.

Then, in the early 80s, all the frauds crawled out of the woodwork. They became "the parade" we never got ... and every one of them was a "Rambo" of course. Most of 'em were obvious to me (if not to others) but the rampant fictions and falsehoods just added insult to injury.

Victor_c3

(3,557 posts)
16. Thank you and your generation
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:50 PM
Sep 2012

It is because of guys like you and your generation that guys like me and my generation have as much support as we do when we come home from war. The VA, the recognition of PTSD, and a variety of extra benefits that are a huge reason I'm probably not dead or homeless right now. I don't know how I'd be able to survive without the help I get - and it is all because of the struggles that guys like you went though.

I don't know if it helps you at all, but your generation did make the county a better place for your children (my generation). Even if we still fight wars based on ambiguous politics, the country learned a valuable lesson on how to take care of its servicemembers. Thanks you!

TahitiNut

(71,611 posts)
26. I appreciate that.
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 10:19 AM
Sep 2012

NOBODY should have to go through what most of us went through (and CONTINUE to go through).

It's a no-win, fruitless, maddening experience. No matter what, folks seem to think they have license to kick us in the face. When I try to just describe my experience, I get insults and worse. I've NEVER wanted pity. I never wanted a medal. I've NEVER wanted an "attaboy." I've NEVER wanted anything but something better than betrayal and blame.

When I talk about a wife that was sleeping with her lover the night I returned frm Nam, the reaction is that it's either (1) my fault, or (2) asking for pity, or (3) both. NOBODY seems to comprehend that it was emblematic of the sense of BETRAYAL most of us felt.

When I talk about getting spit on going through SFO on the way "back home," I'm called a liar and, in effect, spit on again. The oh-so-enlightened 'liberals' trot out Lembcke's flawed pseudo-science to "prove" nobody was spit on ... a work that completely ignores the 400-500% "increase" in Viet Nam veterans in the 80s and the fact that Amerika was overrun by Faux Vets ... most of whom were LYING about EVERYTHING -- attempting to claim an experience by exploiting the shit that they themselves probably threw.

A lot of folks try to comfort themselves by claiming some belated "welcome home" was given, and totally ignore the fact that the spitting and betrayal continues every time one of us is (in effect) told to eat shit and die.

The theme is and was betrayal ... from Jane amusing herself by play-acting "Kill The Americans" on an anti-aircraft gun emplacement ... to the portrayal of "Rambo" as some out-of-control killer. We're all fucking nuts, didn't ya know?


It's been a long, hard struggle to get the message across that respecting Service is NOT the same as agreeing to the corrupt policies that started a war. The invasion of Iraq was a war crime. Nonetheless, I happen to know that one can serve honorably in a dishonorable war. Hating the war is NOT best-expressed as hate for the warrior. If anything, it's exactly what gets us the kind of corruption that Cheney/Bush personified.

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
8. My father was stationed in Okinawa during the tail end of Vietnam
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:42 PM
Sep 2012

Okinawa served as the main forward point prior to heading into theatre, and to this day he still claims no veteran status to Vietnam regardless of having the campaign ribbon.

rexcat

(3,622 posts)
10. Actually...
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:47 PM
Sep 2012

I am one of those who served during the Viet Nam war but did not go to Viet Nam. The USAF had other plans for me but I was "frozen" for assignment for Viet Nam the entire time I served. I was constantly reminded of that by the lifers over me. At the time I served I could have gone over there. Fortunately my MOS was such that first term airmen usually did not go into combat situations. How would you like us who served during the fucking war but who were not in-country describe ourselves? Personally I see it as Viet Nam combat veterans (or combat veterans) and for those who where not in-country Viet Nam Era veterans.

I never lie about my service. I served and received my honorable discharge after my four years of active duty. I freely admit that I joined the USAF, requested an MOS that had one year of training so that my chances of not going to Viet Nam were lessened. I lucked out and I see nothing dishonorable about that. I saw the war as a total disaster when I was in high school despite the fact that my father was an officer and fighter pilot in the USAF. My family has been represented in every war since the Revolutionary War. I have a nephew (my brother's son) who is currently in Afghanistan.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
14. Everyone who served, served.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:27 PM
Sep 2012

There's no dishonor in serving and doing your damnedest to keep your head down.

TahitiNut

(71,611 posts)
15. See... this is what's so fucking annoying about it.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:44 PM
Sep 2012

You just don't GET IT. It's not surprising ... so few do. So, let me try to make it clearer.


I DON'T want "credit" or an "attaboy" or to be treated as some kind of "hero." Never did. Never will.
I don't know any (real) Viet Nam Vet who looks at it that way. It's hard to feel "heroic" when so much of the time in Nam was infuriating Mickey Mose nonsense and utter boredom, punctuated by short times of pants-pissing terror that the incoming is gonna blow you up or leave you without an arm or a leg. I don't know ANYONE I was with that felt particularly "heroic" or "brave." No fucking way. Every damned swinging dick was focused on one thing: counting down their own 365 and getting the fuck out of there. I don't know a single swinging dick that didn't envy guys like you ... or guys that managed to avoid the draft altogether. Even Jody. Everyone did it differently ... but nobody I ever knew was eager for medals or pats on the back. (Least of all... medals.)

That's the WHOLE POINT. It was a matter of survival ... and getting back to the real world.
All I EVER wanted was for my wife, family and friends to be glad I got back alive and in one piece.
The "welcome" I wanted wasn't a parade for "heroes" ... just relief and some expression of love.

Instead, it was a kick in the teeth. That's ESPECIALLY difficult to deal with when, as often happens, I felt some degree of "survivor's guilt." You see, we all went to Nam alone. And we came back alone. In between, we made friends that became closer than we'd ever had. We didn't fuck with each other. Long nights standing guard on some bunker line ... we talked. We shared parts of ourselves we'd never trusted anyone with before. We got drunk together. We trusted each other. Leaving Nam to go back to the world felt like abandoning friends.

For what? Just to survive. That's all.

Then we see all the "Rambos" ... guys claiming some kind of credit that it never even occurred to me to want. There are so fucking many of them that everyone misses the fucking point! Other people form their impressions MOSTLY from such frauds ... and the movies. It, Just. Ain't. That. Way.

For you to equate my annoyance to some "dishonor" for YOUR service is just nuts.

But there's a DIFFERENCE between surviving ... counting down 365 days and hoping you didn't get killed or (worse) maimed for life ... scared ... and doing your time stateside. A BIG difference. It's a difference tht can't be described. No matter how much you THINK maybe you "get it" from what I've said ... you don't.

rexcat

(3,622 posts)
17. I never said that your annoyance dishonored my service...
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 11:12 PM
Sep 2012

I had friends who went to Viet Nam and came back changed in many ways and in many ways not for the good. I also had to watch them self-destruct in their personal lives or deaden the emotional pain with drugs or alcohol. I also so the aftermath of the war while working in a USAF hospital and saw Marines who had been wounded die after they came back from that hell.

No, I am not a combat vet but from you comments I guess I am to fucking stupid to understand anything. Over the years I have enjoyed your posts but at this point you can just fuck yourself and wallow in your own self-pity.

Good day and have a nice life.

rppper

(2,952 posts)
18. Different service...but the trust thing is relevant
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 11:45 PM
Sep 2012

I am a cold war submarine vet, The whole premise of a sub crew is trusting the guy next to you can save your life and save the boat if need be....and while I was never in anyone's line of fire directly, our mission was especially deadly...we carried 16 nuclear missiles carrying 150+ warheads of 200 kilotons apiece...that's a warhead 10 times more powerful than the Nagasaki bomb....that's nearly the equivalent to every explosion during WWII...on other boats we did spec ops with seals and marines....other boats we spied on countries and monitored hot zones...I never saw it for the danger it was until years afterward, but I can't even try to
Compare this to field combat and the constant cloud of death hanging over you.

My dad served as a grunt in Korea and applied for special forces afterwards...he was a no shit green beret....after his tours I grew up in panama at the school of America's where my father taught special ops...he was in country early, 64 and 65...but what he shared about his war experiences cemented my joining the navy! Very terrifying...dad never had screaming issues or PTSD that I saw, but there were plenty of times dad had "dead eyes" staring at the TV....I have a brother who was airborne too...his experiences were later in the war....was hurt during tet....did his year and went to Germany....the war took a piece of him....he's had lots of problems...

Thanks for doing your service....I'm glad your here today sharing your story....it means something to people that have had to trust a group of people in the same situations together. You never forget it or them....

 

glacierbay

(2,477 posts)
12. LOL
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:03 PM
Sep 2012

fought the VC in Oklahoma or Germany, that's some funny shit there.
I have nothing but contempt for anyone who claims they served in VN when they really didn't.
I didn't know that there were only 750,000 of us left, I guess just like the WW2 and Korean vets, we are slowly disappearing into the dustbin of history.

icarusxat

(403 posts)
20. those who have served fade away
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 01:15 AM
Sep 2012

but, there is no dust bin for those who gave in any capacity. I served in the cold war. Was ready, if needed, to do what ever was asked. Being there for ones country is what it is all about. Being in harms way takes on many faces. Never diminish your service to your country based on a critique from someone who cannot grasp the meaning of being a patriot.

 

glacierbay

(2,477 posts)
24. Oh I didn't mean for it to sound the way it did
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 08:01 AM
Sep 2012

I am proud of my 2 tours in VN and never shy away from it. I could have used a better phrase than dust bin of history.

mopinko

(70,113 posts)
13. yeah, i got a brother like that.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:22 PM
Sep 2012

did fly one mission, seeding clouds over the ho chi min trail. spent the rest of his hitch at fort ord launching weather balloons. never fired his rifle.
but oh boy, is he a warrior now.

judesedit

(4,438 posts)
22. Are they jealous? I'll bet none of them or their kids ever served a day in any military service.
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 02:37 AM
Sep 2012

Does this ridiculous money and time wasting bullshit make them feel important? They are still the "Do Nothing" but waste time, Congress, no matter how you look at it.

judesedit

(4,438 posts)
23. Lying about fighti in VietNam or any other conflict shows the amount of respect for or guilt someone
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 02:53 AM
Sep 2012

has surrounding the issue. They either admire the brave men and women who actually did go to fight for the freedom of many, during a time when nobody trusted this government and took it out on the soldiers instead of where it belonged. Or they feel guilty for not going for whatever reason. Copying is the highest complement. It does NOT take away from the honorable veterans in any way as far as I'm concerned. The money part is fraud and unfortunately has become common in our country. Look at our govenment. These people say they are civil servants, but the serve no one but themselves and their lobbyist owners. This is another diversion, my friends...to make you think they actually care about something they know NOTHING about.

 

panzerfaust

(2,818 posts)
27. Not often, these days, that I can agree with a Republican
Sat Sep 15, 2012, 03:48 PM
Sep 2012

Why did not a democrat have the political savvy to write this bill? Why was it left to the party of chickenhawks to do the right thing?



I lost a lot of friends here. I could have lost me.

Any dirt-bag falsely claiming to be a vet, much less a decorated vet, should go to prison - in my opinion.


Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House passes revamped Sto...