Dozens Of Women Are Suing A Hospital That Secretly Recorded Their Gynecology Operations
Source: BuzzFeed News
Dozens Of Women Are Suing A Hospital That Secretly Recorded Their Gynecology Operations
Eighty-one women are suing Sharp Grossmont Hospital in San Diego, California, for secretly recording them during gynecological surgeries.
Azeen Ghorayshi
BuzzFeed News Reporter
Posted on March 31, 2019, at 4:59 p.m. ET
Eighty-one women are suing Sharp Grossmont Hospital in San Diego, California, after learning that they were secretly recorded by hidden cameras installed in the hospital's gynecology operating rooms, according to a complaint filed in California Supreme Court last week.
From July 17, 2012 to June 30, 2013, roughly 1,800 women were recorded in the three operating rooms at the hospital's Women's Center, the complaint stated.
The motion-sensing cameras recorded video of births, emergency C-sections, miscarriages, hysterectomies, sterilizations, and a variety of other procedures. The videos depicted the women's faces as they entered the hospital rooms for their operations, some were recorded undressing, and some were unconscious during the course of their procedures. None of the women were told they were being recorded.
"Its such a shocking breach of patient privacy," Allison Goddard, the attorney representing the women in the case, told BuzzFeed News. "Ive talked to hundreds of women who were affected by it. The response is nearly universal: they just cant believe it happened."
Read more: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/azeenghorayshi/san-diego-secret-camera-hospital-lawsuit
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)madaboutharry
(40,224 posts)Who thought this was a good idea?
The longer I live the more I can not believe that this planet is home to so many idiots.
I hope each and every one of these women sue this hospital into oblivion.
oldsoftie
(12,618 posts)MaryMagdaline
(6,856 posts)Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)mitch96
(13,926 posts)Oh and by the way the papers you signed before the operations in oblique medical/legal jargon allows us to do it... Uggghhhh..
m
More_Cowbell
(2,191 posts)mitch96
(13,926 posts)A common problem. One hospital I worked at they found an anesthesiologist passed out in the locker room whacked out on fentanyl. Seems everything made sense b/c the recovery room nurses could not understand why post op patients were waking up from anesthesia in excruciating pain. The doc was replacing the pain killer with water and then using it on her self..
Many moons ago we used pharmaceutical (10%) cocaine for lung procedures. Anything left went into the doctors pocket. This was after he signed off saying 100% was used during the procedure.. I could go on and on....
m
BigmanPigman
(51,636 posts)Sue them! I know women who go to that hopsital. I am going to send this to them.
Liberty Belle
(9,535 posts)ck4829
(35,093 posts)cannabis_flower
(3,768 posts)That they were recorded in the dressing rooms and without their faces being blurred. I would have been OK with them recording the operations if their faces weren't shown.
obamanut2012
(26,143 posts)cannabis_flower
(3,768 posts)it and it was to just show the parts of the body that were being operated on it wouldn't be so personal. For example, do you think anyone could be identified, even by themselves if all that was being recorded was their vagina?
Not only that, there probably was consent in their paperwork but I'm sure that no one was informed that they might be recorded while dressing and their face might be shown.
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed