GOP elector resigns, says she can't support Romney
Source: AP
One of the Republican appointees to the Electoral College abruptly resigned from her post Thursday after publicly questioning whether she would support the party's presidential ticket when casting official votes after the November election.
Melinda Wadsley of Ames, Iowa, told The Associated Press that she could not in good conscience vote for party nominee Mitt Romney. Wadsley was among three electors who had told the AP for a story published Thursday that they were exploring alternatives should Romney win their states.
"I have always been a straight ticket Republican, and for the first time in my life I am an undecided voter, therefore, I need to resign my position as a Republican presidential elector," Wadsley said in an email exchange.
Iowa GOP Chairman A.J. Spiker said in a statement that the state party's central committee would begin the process of selecting a replacement, essentially allowing the party to confirm a die-hard Romney supporter.
Wadsley and others had expressed frustration at how Republican leaders have worked to suppress Paul's conservative movement and his legion of loyal supporters.
"They've never given Ron Paul a fair shot, and I'm disgusted with that. I'd like to show them how disgusted I am," Wadsley had told the AP earlier, saying she was considering withholding her electoral vote from Romney. She is an Iowa mother of three who was selected as a Republican elector earlier this year and said Paul was the better choice.
Read more: http://www.nctimes.com/news/national/govt-and-politics/electoral-college-members-may-pass-on-romney/article_9e86efc1-9b67-5275-a398-b19f0ddc36f5.html
not looking good on all sides for these guys
left on green only
(1,484 posts)Keep bailing mittens.
humblebum
(5,881 posts)in this day and age.
xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)55 electoral college 'electors'. Solid democrat, loves Obama.
humblebum
(5,881 posts)sure that most of them are upstanding citizens. Nonetheless, the Electoral College in this era of mass media is a disgrace to the idea of "one person, one vote" as well as "a well-informed electorate."
With the existence of the Electoral College your vote is only a suggestion. Dump it.
We strive for democracy around the globe but are denied it here.
xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)pissed the millions of votes Obama will receive in California only count as 55 electoral votes. While that is the largest block, it reduces my vote to next to nothing. There will be more people voting for Obama here than the total population of some states!
sofa king
(10,857 posts)Plus one electoral vote. California cancels out every single one of the unfortunate states above which are sure to go in favor of Romney. All of them.
Sirveri
(4,517 posts)You don't actually vote for President, you vote for electors who are 'pledged' to vote for the president in the electoral college. It's just a quirk of our system.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)--------
24601
(3,962 posts)not affect it's Constitutional standing.
To change it, there's an amendment process.
humblebum
(5,881 posts)with the exception of the Electoral College. Your vote for President is still nothing more than a suggestion as long as it exists. Let's begin the process.
24601
(3,962 posts)drafting and ratification of the Constitution was any of it put to a democratic vote of the people. It was always by a republic-style methodology where a smaller number represented others.
The US was never a democracy and it's founding documents do not reflect that intent either in words or process.
humblebum
(5,881 posts)the Federalist Papers. The Electoral College made much sense in the 18th and 19th centuries when few ever had any real access to the presidential candidates. But, today when the media allows us to know what color underwear they have on, individuals are more than able to make rational choices based upon what they see and hear.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)humblebum
(5,881 posts)and a much more representative democracy.
And nothing in the Constitution suggesting a representative democracy? Just how then was the Constitution ratified by majority of the original 13 states?
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...if it didn't start that way? Sure it's called representative NOW, but representative of what? Of whom? It didn't represent the original people here, did it? No slaves were presented, were they? No women? No renters? What about them? Don't they count?
- I don't require an answer, I just want you to think about what you say before you say it.
You might want to start here: The Lies My Teacher Told Me
humblebum
(5,881 posts)This is not the 18th century, and every citizen over the the age of 18 has a vote. There are some serious flaws in your reasoning.
Yes, votes are counted in this country one person-one vote, except for the presidency. If you want to stay in the past, be my guess. But the world is moving on.
Yes, we are both a representative democracy and a republic.
Response to humblebum (Reply #39)
DeSwiss This message was self-deleted by its author.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)And they aren't with my reasoning.
Good day.
humblebum
(5,881 posts)precipitated changes in society's changing attitudes toward human and civil rights. Your reasoning is very flawed.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)and doesn't make it as democratic as other representative democracies (small "d" in the Europe.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)I agree with you.
JohnnyRingo
(18,633 posts)Scouring the asylums and mental wards as we speak.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)depressed voters I meet are actually Republicans who don't want to admit it to me. In the past, Republicans have been rather aggressive about their candidates and views, but this year, they are being unusually quiet so far. Just not wanting to talk. If somebody hangs their head when I ask them if they want to register, I figure that they are Republican.
goclark
(30,404 posts)I was laughing so hard...
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)who wasn't being paid to be one. And even the paid campaign surrogates don't look that enthusiastic lately.
mikeytherat
(6,829 posts)mikey_the_rat
freshwest
(53,661 posts)This means nothing for Democrats. A no-vote, one for Obama or the other guy, would have been helpful. Another brain dead Republican stays brain dead. Thanks for nothing, toots.
progressoid
(49,991 posts)xfundy
(5,105 posts)(The image on the bottom of your post.)
I love that!
Cha
(297,257 posts)It's my sig line.
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)mountain grammy
(26,622 posts)Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)then by all means go ahead. It'll be less votes for Obama's main opposition, so I'm not complaining!
Iris
(15,657 posts)trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)cbrer
(1,831 posts)With a 10 ton crane!
caseymoz
(5,763 posts)He's done it! Romney has made vacuous mediocrity shocking to the conscience! Not Reagan, not Quayle, not George H. W., not even George W. Bush accomplished that with Republicans!
I think this is a definite turning point in US politics.
donqpublic
(155 posts)If you remember, after Willard killed Socrates (Ron Paul), the other rats didn't jump ship...they killed him.
KANTANA
(32 posts)It takes a brain dead, thoughtless, hateful and totally uneducated person to vote for Romney. A total ROBOT!!
Zambero
(8,964 posts)but draws the line at the current head of the GOP ticket. Ouch for you, Mittens!