Supreme Court won't review blocked Alabama law that bans most second-trimester abortions
Source: CNBC
PUBLISHED 13 MIN AGO UPDATED 8 MIN AGO
Tucker Higgins
@TUCKERHIGGINS
KEY POINTS
The Supreme Court will not hear arguments over a 2016 Alabama abortion law that outlaws the most common procedure used during a pregnancys second trimester, the court said on Friday in an order.
The decision means the law, which had been blocked by lower courts, will not go into effect.
Two federal courts blocked the law after finding that there was no alternative method that was safe, effective and available.
The Supreme Court will not hear arguments over a 2016 Alabama abortion law that outlaws the most common procedure used during a pregnancys second trimester, the court said on Friday in an order. The decision means the law, which had been blocked by lower courts, will not go into effect.
The case concerned a law enacted by Alabama lawmakers in 2016 which bars the dilation and evacuation procedure. The procedure, which is typical after about 15 weeks, involves dilating the cervix and removing fetal tissue, often in multiple pieces, which is prohibited by the laws language banning dismemberment. The law provides an exception in cases involving serious health risk to the mother.
The procedure accounts for 99% of abortions performed after 15 weeks in Alabama, according to attorneys for the respondents in the case, which include two Alabama womens centers and two doctors.
The law never went into effect. Two federal courts blocked the law after finding that there was no alternative method that was safe, effective and available. The Supreme Court has held that state bans on abortion before the fetus is viable are unlawful.
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/28/supreme-court-wont-revive-restrictive-alabama-abortion-law-from-2016.html
Kind of Blue
(8,709 posts)lark
(23,147 posts)Of course, I don't trust these extreme partisan Russian Repugs at SCOTUS to do the right thing and think they are just waiting until closer to th election to overturn abortion and potentially even outlaw the use of birth control pills. I hope I'm wrong but I don't trust those fuckers one little bit.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)lark
(23,147 posts)So sad for our country and especially the women in America.
gldstwmn
(4,575 posts)So withe the current bench it is safe. But if Trump gets elected again...
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,575 posts)Scroll down to page 8, please.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/062819zr_jgkn.pdf
WinstonSmith4740
(3,056 posts)This also kind of sets a precedent to stay out of these cases. All of them are draconian, so as they wind their way through the court system, it's possible that if they decline to hear a couple more, this freight train can be slowed down.
Of course, it'll also be fun watching the Rethugs light their hair on fire, and turn on the court conservatives.
onetexan
(13,056 posts)abortion is allowed