Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Fri Jun 28, 2019, 10:04 AM Jun 2019

Supreme Court won't review blocked Alabama law that bans most second-trimester abortions

Source: CNBC


PUBLISHED 13 MIN AGO UPDATED 8 MIN AGO




Tucker Higgins
@TUCKERHIGGINS

KEY POINTS

The Supreme Court will not hear arguments over a 2016 Alabama abortion law that outlaws the most common procedure used during a pregnancy’s second trimester, the court said on Friday in an order.

The decision means the law, which had been blocked by lower courts, will not go into effect.

Two federal courts blocked the law after finding that there was no alternative method that was safe, effective and available.


The Supreme Court will not hear arguments over a 2016 Alabama abortion law that outlaws the most common procedure used during a pregnancy’s second trimester, the court said on Friday in an order. The decision means the law, which had been blocked by lower courts, will not go into effect.

The case concerned a law enacted by Alabama lawmakers in 2016 which bars the dilation and evacuation procedure. The procedure, which is typical after about 15 weeks, involves dilating the cervix and removing fetal tissue, often in multiple pieces, which is prohibited by the law’s language banning “dismemberment.” The law provides an exception in cases involving serious health risk to the mother.

The procedure accounts for 99% of abortions performed after 15 weeks in Alabama, according to attorneys for the respondents in the case, which include two Alabama women’s centers and two doctors.

The law never went into effect. Two federal courts blocked the law after finding that there was no alternative method that was safe, effective and available. The Supreme Court has held that state bans on abortion before the fetus is viable are unlawful.

Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/28/supreme-court-wont-revive-restrictive-alabama-abortion-law-from-2016.html

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court won't review blocked Alabama law that bans most second-trimester abortions (Original Post) DonViejo Jun 2019 OP
If I'm reading correctly then Thank Goddess! Kind of Blue Jun 2019 #1
Surprising in a very good way. lark Jun 2019 #2
Not surprising, they don't have the votes to overturn Roe v. Wade on the current court. n/t PoliticAverse Jun 2019 #3
They do if Roberts votes rw, as he almost always does. lark Jun 2019 #4
Roberts has already said he sees it as settled law. gldstwmn Jun 2019 #8
Here's a link to the order: mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2019 #5
Good news! WinstonSmith4740 Jun 2019 #6
in some ways i'm thankful since if they leave it up to the states at least in the blue states onetexan Jun 2019 #7

lark

(23,147 posts)
2. Surprising in a very good way.
Fri Jun 28, 2019, 10:09 AM
Jun 2019

Of course, I don't trust these extreme partisan Russian Repugs at SCOTUS to do the right thing and think they are just waiting until closer to th election to overturn abortion and potentially even outlaw the use of birth control pills. I hope I'm wrong but I don't trust those fuckers one little bit.

lark

(23,147 posts)
4. They do if Roberts votes rw, as he almost always does.
Fri Jun 28, 2019, 12:26 PM
Jun 2019

So sad for our country and especially the women in America.

gldstwmn

(4,575 posts)
8. Roberts has already said he sees it as settled law.
Fri Jun 28, 2019, 06:03 PM
Jun 2019

So withe the current bench it is safe. But if Trump gets elected again...

WinstonSmith4740

(3,056 posts)
6. Good news!
Fri Jun 28, 2019, 05:30 PM
Jun 2019

This also kind of sets a precedent to stay out of these cases. All of them are draconian, so as they wind their way through the court system, it's possible that if they decline to hear a couple more, this freight train can be slowed down.

Of course, it'll also be fun watching the Rethugs light their hair on fire, and turn on the court conservatives.

onetexan

(13,056 posts)
7. in some ways i'm thankful since if they leave it up to the states at least in the blue states
Fri Jun 28, 2019, 06:01 PM
Jun 2019

abortion is allowed

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court won't revie...