Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

savalez

(3,517 posts)
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 08:03 PM Jan 2012

Exclusive: Republicans move to control Keystone approval

WASHINGTON | Wed Jan 11, 2012 5:54pm EST

(Reuters) - Congressional Republicans, who are urging President Barack Obama to back the Canada-to-Texas Keystone XL oil pipeline, are now working on plans to take the reins of approval from the hands of the president should the White House say no.

North Dakota Senator John Hoeven, whose state is counting on the pipeline to help move its newfound bounty of shale oil, is drafting legislation that would see Congress give the green light to the project by using its constitutional powers to regulate commerce with foreign nations, an aide told Reuters.

Source Reuters:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/11/us-usa-keystone-bill-idUSTRE80A28C20120111

------------

Republican motto: If it's against the rules, change the rules.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Exclusive: Republicans move to control Keystone approval (Original Post) savalez Jan 2012 OP
I really, really have a big dislike for these repugs... movonne Jan 2012 #1
If its part of the consitution though how exactly can it be against the rules? cstanleytech Jan 2012 #2
I am referring to the provision savalez Jan 2012 #3
"...drafting legislation that would see Congress give the green light to the project" BumRushDaShow Jan 2012 #4

savalez

(3,517 posts)
3. I am referring to the provision
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 03:51 AM
Jan 2012

that was attached to the payroll tax extension that a decision on the Keystone XL pipeline be made within 60 days. The implication being that this was to be decided by the President and not by Congress.

BumRushDaShow

(129,017 posts)
4. "...drafting legislation that would see Congress give the green light to the project"
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 09:28 AM
Jan 2012

And this gets through self-same Senate how? And why does Reuters not remind the reader about this guy and how he would actually become "a law" as part of fact-checking the drivel that is uttered by a repuke?



Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Exclusive: Republicans mo...