Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,093 posts)
Fri Aug 16, 2019, 07:50 PM Aug 2019

Court: US can reject asylum along parts of Mexico border

Source: AP

HOUSTON (AP) — A federal appeals court on Friday cleared the way for the U.S. government to forbid Central American immigrants from seeking asylum at the two busiest stretches of the southern border in a partial legal victory for the Trump administration.

The ruling from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals allows President Donald Trump to enforce the policy in New Mexico and Texas, rejecting asylum seekers who cross from Mexico into either state. Under Friday's ruling, U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar's July 24 order stopping the policy would apply only in California and Arizona, which are covered by the 9th Circuit.

The two busiest areas for unauthorized border crossings are in South Texas' Rio Grande Valley and the region around El Paso, Texas, which includes New Mexico. Nearly 50,000 people in July crossed the U.S. border without permission in those two regions, according to the U.S. Border Patrol.

-snip-

If the policy is implemented, ineligible migrants who cross in New Mexico and Texas could be detained and more quickly deported. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a request for comment Friday.



Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/court-us-can-reject-asylum-along-parts-of-mexico-border/ar-AAFTNKB?li=BBnbcA1

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court: US can reject asylum along parts of Mexico border (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 2019 OP
Damn. sinkingfeeling Aug 2019 #1
when tRump is long gone those fascist judges will be f'ing things up for decades. nt yaesu Aug 2019 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Polybius Aug 2019 #6
Not sure you're reading that correctly ... mr_lebowski Aug 2019 #7
You are right Polybius Aug 2019 #8
And they will still come in. Iliyah Aug 2019 #3
Why does this apply to two states and not the other two? BigmanPigman Aug 2019 #4
Dunno. Igel Aug 2019 #5
Think it's due to where the judges have jurisdiction. machoneman Aug 2019 #9
Not a guess malthaussen Aug 2019 #10
No. This was a case before the 9th circuit court of appeals. former9thward Aug 2019 #11

Response to yaesu (Reply #2)

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
7. Not sure you're reading that correctly ...
Sat Aug 17, 2019, 12:16 AM
Aug 2019

I'm reading it as Tigar's (earlier) order still protects rights to request asylum in CA and AZ.

But I may be misunderstanding ...

BigmanPigman

(51,613 posts)
4. Why does this apply to two states and not the other two?
Fri Aug 16, 2019, 10:02 PM
Aug 2019

Is it due to the two judges being appointed by tRump and Bush?

Igel

(35,323 posts)
5. Dunno.
Fri Aug 16, 2019, 10:59 PM
Aug 2019

It's the question I had. I think "reporter error" is the cause of the confusion, but who knows?

former9thward

(32,040 posts)
11. No. This was a case before the 9th circuit court of appeals.
Sat Aug 17, 2019, 06:47 PM
Aug 2019

The 9th circuit covers many of the western states -- not just two. The original judge tried to make his order nationwide. The appeals court said this was an error. The order will just apply to the western states which are part of the 9th circuit.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Court: US can reject asyl...