Intelligence community watchdog debunks whistleblower conspiracy pushed by Trump
Source: CNN
Washington (CNN) The intelligence community inspector general is forcefully pushing back against assertions made by President Donald Trump and several Republican lawmakers about the whistleblower complaint that has rocked Washington in recent weeks.
In a rare statement released Monday, the inspector general addressed a false claim pushed by Trump and some of his allies on Capitol Hill, including House GOP leader Kevin McCarthy of California and Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, that the whistleblower lacked firsthand knowledge of the conduct outlined in the complaint and therefore the allegations were based on "hearsay." But the statement from the inspector general made clear that the whistleblower was not simply communicating secondhand knowledge.
"The whistleblower stated on the form that he or she possessed both first-hand and other information," the statement read. "The ICIG reviewed the information provided as well as other information gathered and determined that the complaint was both urgent and that it appeared credible. "
The statement clearly says the whistleblower had "direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct" and that Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson obtained additional information during his preliminary review that supported other allegations in the complaint not based on firsthand knowledge, including Trump's July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/30/politics/icig-statement-whistleblower-complaint/index.html
Full headline: Intelligence community watchdog debunks whistleblower conspiracy pushed by Trump and other Republicans
Cha
(297,304 posts)IthinkThereforeIAM
(3,076 posts)... the deliberate gaslighting and false statements, begging for the IG and ODNI to toss them out some more, "hints", at who it is.
That is what struck me while reading the OP above.
Dem2theMax
(9,651 posts)They are on a fishing trip.
I think the boat has a lot of holes in it.
appalachiablue
(41,145 posts)according to a couple legal experts I've followed.
> Hearsay evidence is "an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted therein." In certain courts, hearsay evidence is inadmissible (the 'Hearsay Evidence Rule') unless an exception to the Hearsay Rule applies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,005 posts)If Able tells Detective Baker that Charlie said he killed a child, of course Detective Baker will use that and investigate Charlie.
How could hearsay be prohibited in investigations, and what possible good would such a blanket prohibition serve?
appalachiablue
(41,145 posts)Hal Zerozerozeronine
(76 posts)Talitha
(6,593 posts)canetoad
(17,168 posts)I like to see real pushback to counter trump's pushback.
bucolic_frolic
(43,181 posts)creating a false public relations narrative - Fake News! - to counter the reality and divert the public's attention from the actual scandal. It's like tabloid government.
Logic, science, rule of law vs. paranoid conspiracy theories.
Maxheader
(4,373 posts)"hearsay."
The final refuge for the wingers when things start to come apart..
Travel Hat
(117 posts)Linda Tripp
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)Welcome to DU!
gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)FUCK OFF!!!!!
lark
(23,105 posts)They all know he's a traitor and they are ones too. They will never stop hurting America for rw power.