House Says Formal Impeachment Inquiry Means It Can Get Mueller's Grand Jury Info
Source: National Law Journal
The House is tying allegations that President Donald Trump tried to get Ukraine to interfere in the upcoming 2020 elections to its legal efforts to obtain grand jury material redacted from special counsel Robert Muellers report.
In a court filing made Monday night, days after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced the House is formally launching an impeachment inquiry into Trump, House attorneys pushed back against the Department of Justices previous assertions that it was unclear whether lawmakers were actually pursuing potential impeachment.
This Court should likewise reject DOJs attempt to claim for itself the power to declare when an impeachment inquiry is underway in the House. Under the Constitutions separation of powers, and the authority the Constitution vests in the House alone to structure its proceedings, that power is not DOJs for the taking, the filing reads. As Speaker Pelosi recently confirmed, the House is moving forward with an official impeachment inquiry. And the Committee has made plain that the primary purpose of the disclosure it seeks is to aid that inquiry.
The House Judiciary Committee filed the lawsuit seeking grand jury material redacted from Muellers report earlier this year, arguing the information is necessary in deciding whether to start impeachment proceedings against the president.
Read more: https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2019/09/30/house-says-formal-impeachment-inquiry-means-it-can-get-muellers-grand-jury-info/
Here is the document filed today by the House.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15975632/33/application-of-the-committee-on-the-judiciary-us-house-of/
Judi Lynn
(160,545 posts)Duppers
(28,125 posts)About time.
B Stieg
(2,410 posts)Meadowoak
(5,551 posts)roscoeroscoe
(1,370 posts)A thousand times yes!
gademocrat7
(10,659 posts)They will prevail.
djacq
(1,634 posts)gab13by13
(21,360 posts)before I officially jumped into the fray. I watched with interest the debate here whether there was a difference between a regular committee hearing, which is legislative in nature, and an impeachment inquiry, which is considered judicial in nature. This clears up the debate, IMO, there is a big difference between a legislative hearing and a judicial hearing. The thing is what I think or what anyone else here at DU thinks is not relevant, it's what do the judges think. The judges must be convinced that Dems are pursuing an impeachment inquiry and that should open up the flood gates for Dems to get the entire unredacted Mueller report, the grand jury testimonies, and expedited court decisions regarding subpoenas.
We need to keep the narrative on impeachment and not on the smoke screens that Trump and Barr are pushing in the MSM.
Speaker Pelosi may well be the brightest Speaker we have had in our history, I trust in her. She needs to keep the pedal to the metal, impeachment needs to go quickly, we start voting in February.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)An ethical person would recuse himself, but Barr is not.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)bluestarone
(16,976 posts)That's what the RETHUGS are planning on! Lot at stake here, nothing will be easy for the House. I believe the SC will decide in our favor, BUT Dragging this on will be the RETHUGS plan and we just have to be ready for a long process ahead! Don't like it BUT it's where we are at!
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)bluestarone
(16,976 posts)I could be wrong here. Hope Russia doesn't have any shit on Roberts though!
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)for denying the Impeachment Inquiry their rights to investigate this matter
Owens
(197 posts)He will block it. He is already helping block NY state's request for Trump's tax records. Democrats need a tough and sharp lawyer to counter Barr's moves.
calimary
(81,320 posts)Lots of reminders of the Nixon era these days ...
cstanleytech
(26,294 posts)can be dismissed by the President so it would be like giving the keys for the henhouse to the fox.
dalton99a
(81,515 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(15,624 posts)That's where the rubber meets the road...
Nitram
(22,822 posts)impede the release of information. They've been quite successful so far on a number of fronts in spite of multiple subpoenas.