Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(129,096 posts)
Tue Oct 1, 2019, 12:54 PM Oct 2019

Judge to DOJ: Decide on charging Andrew McCabe by Nov. 15, or face release of FBI records

Source: Washington Post

A veteran federal judge on Monday warned U.S. prosecutors either to charge former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe or to drop their investigation into whether he lied to investigators about an unauthorized media disclosure, saying their indecision was undermining the credibility of the Justice Department.

If a decision is not made, U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton of Washington, D.C., said at a hearing that he would order the Justice Department to release internal FBI documents related to McCabe’s firing by Nov. 15.

The extraordinary warning by Walton — a 2001 President George W. Bush appointee and former presiding judge of the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court — marked the latest turbulence in an investigation that McCabe’s defenders say is a move by the Trump administration to punish the president’s perceived political enemies.

At a brief hearing in an open records lawsuit, Walton confirmed McCabe has not been indicted and that the department still is weighing charges.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/judge-to-doj-decide-on-charging-andrew-mccabe-by-nov-15-or-face-release-of-fbi-records/2019/10/01/3e169168-e3c4-11e9-a331-2df12d56a80b_story.html



6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge to DOJ: Decide on charging Andrew McCabe by Nov. 15, or face release of FBI records (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Oct 2019 OP
More smearing...they know if they press he gets vindicated Thomas Hurt Oct 2019 #1
If they couldn't get a grand jury to indict neohippie Oct 2019 #2
So he's giving them incentive to charge - they face consequences - release of records bucolic_frolic Oct 2019 #3
Charge or release documents? Are you kidding? Perseus Oct 2019 #4
I'm rethinking this action bucolic_frolic Oct 2019 #5
My only question is bluestarone Oct 2019 #6

neohippie

(1,142 posts)
2. If they couldn't get a grand jury to indict
Tue Oct 1, 2019, 01:02 PM
Oct 2019

They ain't got the do rae me

They apparently don't have enough to convince a grand jury to indict, but they are vindictive and won't let this go

bucolic_frolic

(43,181 posts)
3. So he's giving them incentive to charge - they face consequences - release of records
Tue Oct 1, 2019, 01:35 PM
Oct 2019

Maybe gives McCabe an angle to further challenge their motives?

 

Perseus

(4,341 posts)
4. Charge or release documents? Are you kidding?
Tue Oct 1, 2019, 03:41 PM
Oct 2019

Documents should be released no matter what, even if they invent a reason for indictment. I believe the judge is giving them an incentive to indict him. Documents should follow, and I would not be surprised to find more evidence for impeachment in those documents.

bucolic_frolic

(43,181 posts)
5. I'm rethinking this action
Tue Oct 1, 2019, 06:03 PM
Oct 2019

The judge is calling their bluff. It's like he suspects the prosecutors are stonewalling to prevent release of the records. So here he gives them an incentive to put up or shut up. He makes it easy for them to charge, perhaps suspecting they have a weak case. 'Get on with it, charge or the documents will be released!'

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge to DOJ: Decide on c...