Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,460 posts)
Tue Oct 8, 2019, 05:52 PM Oct 2019

Top progressive calls for Pompeo's salary to be withheld over Sondland's blocked testimony

Source: The Hill

Top progressive calls for Pompeo's salary to be withheld over Sondland's blocked testimony
BY JULIEGRACE BRUFKE - 10/08/19 05:43 PM EDT

Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) is advocating for Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s salary to be withheld until EU Ambassador Gordon Sondland is permitted to testify before Congress as part of Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.

In a letter sent to Pompeo on Tuesday, the Democrat who is one of the co-chairs of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, argued that a provision of the law allows Congress to withhold any federal official’s compensation if they prevent another government employee from communicating with lawmakers or committees. ... The letter came after the State Department blocked Sondland from testifying in a House deposition scheduled for Tuesday, ramping up tensions between congressional Democrats and the Trump administration amid an impeachment inquiry.

Pocan in his letter referred to "section 713 of Division D of Public Law 116-6 signed by the President earlier this year." ... "As you are aware, this section prohibits paying the salary of any ‘officer or employee of the Federal Government who prohibits or prevents…any other officer or employee of the Federal Government from…communication or contact with any Member, committee, or subcommittee of the Congress,’” the Wisconsin Democrat wrote.

“I believe the person prohibiting Ambassador Sondland from testifying before the House Intelligence Committee is in violation of this statute, and that their salary should be withheld until Ambassador Sondland appears before Congress," Pocan also wrote.

Pocan also referred to a story from The Wall Street Journal last week that reported Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) saying he had been told by Sondland of a quid pro quo tying nearly $400 million in aid to Ukraine to a commitment from the country to probe matters arising from the 2016 election.

{snip}

Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/464918-top-progressive-calls-for-pompeos-salary-to-be-withheld-over-sondlands-blocked



I'm not fond of that headline. I'll replace it when I can.

Hat tip, commenter JHunter at Joe.My.God, who linked to Pocan's tweet.

WH Letter To Pelosi: We Won’t Cooperate With Probe

https://www.joemygod.com/2019/10/wh-letter-to-pelosi-we-wont-cooperate-with-probe/

== == == == == ==

Just sent @SecPompeo a letter flagging that the Feb 2019 spending bill prohibits pay to federal officials who prevent other officials from communicating with Congress.

We refuse to bankroll this administration while they hold witnesses hostage. Sondland must testify on Ukraine.


12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Top progressive calls for Pompeo's salary to be withheld over Sondland's blocked testimony (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2019 OP
I like this very much. Repercussions, otherwise why would anyone expect a different outcome?! Nevermypresident Oct 2019 #1
They should also do the same for the White House and reduce the funding for it so cstanleytech Oct 2019 #2
K&R ck4829 Oct 2019 #3
If that happens Pompeo will be on wingnut welfare provided by his deep pocket pals within hours. LastDemocratInSC Oct 2019 #4
The Constitution of the United States, Article I, Section 9, paragraph 3 comradebillyboy Oct 2019 #5
You didn't read the article, did you? DrToast Oct 2019 #6
Let's go to the mattresses! gibraltar72 Oct 2019 #7
Follow the law. Karadeniz Oct 2019 #8
Hurt them in the Pocket; djacq Oct 2019 #9
They won't care. Mr.Bill Oct 2019 #10
Wish I'd thought of that MurrayDelph Oct 2019 #11
I would begin impeachment proceedings against every Executive Branch official that refused to appear pecosbob Oct 2019 #12

cstanleytech

(26,291 posts)
2. They should also do the same for the White House and reduce the funding for it so
Tue Oct 8, 2019, 06:13 PM
Oct 2019

the only ones inside it are the Secret Service and Trumps family but no kitchen or housekeeping staff and no groundskeepers.
If he tries to bring in the military to do the work then the military's entire budget should be cut as well by 1/5th.
Furthermore funds to pay for Trumps travel anywhere should be withheld including funds to pay for the Secret Service to travel with him or in other words he needs to be grounded until he can behave.

LastDemocratInSC

(3,647 posts)
4. If that happens Pompeo will be on wingnut welfare provided by his deep pocket pals within hours.
Tue Oct 8, 2019, 06:27 PM
Oct 2019

But the House should defund him anyway.

comradebillyboy

(10,149 posts)
5. The Constitution of the United States, Article I, Section 9, paragraph 3
Tue Oct 8, 2019, 06:30 PM
Oct 2019

provides that: "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law will be passed." A Bill of Attainder is a legislative act that singles out an individual or group for punishment without a trial.

That proposal is blatantly unconstitutional. Our cause is not well served by such nonsense.

Mr.Bill

(24,296 posts)
10. They won't care.
Tue Oct 8, 2019, 08:23 PM
Oct 2019

They don't do their jobs for the paycheck. What they grift with their office makes their pay look like pocket change.

pecosbob

(7,541 posts)
12. I would begin impeachment proceedings against every Executive Branch official that refused to appear
Wed Oct 9, 2019, 10:37 AM
Oct 2019

before Congress...period. Make official and write it in stone.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Top progressive calls for...