https://www.marienewmanforcongress.com/

No excuse for this kind of crap in Blue Chicago.

I once thought Trump's misogyny would sink him among women. I was wrong.

I was of the opinion that women would object to their loss of choice, but now I don't know.

they would be the minority anyway given there are very few GOP women in Congress.

Roe v. Wade said that a woman's right to privacy is what permits her to make a decision on whether or not to carry a fetus to term. The people in this case are arguing about "undue burdens." That is, the sorts of laws and regulations that idiot GOP reps like to pass to try to limit a woman's ability to carry out the private decision she makes. Idiot laws like telling doctors to re-implant an embryo from an ectopic pregnancy. Something that cannot be done.

Requiring the clinics to be built in a certain way and requiring their doctors to have admitting privileges are two popular methods to try to limit a woman's ability to carry out her personal, private, and, often, painful decision. They actually have nothing to do with the concern for the woman's health and well being - no matter that they lie and say that's the reason for those laws and regulations. There are far more dangerous procedures performed in doctor's offices that are not regulated in the same manner.

This is, as always, just an attempt to control women through controlling their bodies. Shameful as always.

Radical leftists, like now Justice Ginsburg, forced women to think for themselves, continuing the leftist agenda in the 13th, 14th, 15th forced black people to think for themselves, then burdening women with the 19th.

Liberty is when white men make all your decisions for you. Deciding where and how, and for which white men you labor. When you do not need to think about who should write laws to control you, because white men are obviously the ones who need to bear that burden.

That's the White Man's Burden: thinking for non-whites, thinking for women, and telling them all what to think and how to act.

Free women from the burden of thinking for themselves, the real Women's Liberation!

I see you're new. You may want to use the sarcasm smilie so people know for sure.

and bring out women in droves to vote against the Cons

He also voted against tRump's impeachment, not to mention the use of Republican talking points in his responses to constituent concerns. He may represent a "red" district in Minnesota, but there are plenty of women in that district. I personally want him primaried. It is obvious he does not represent the DFL in Minnesota.

Chief Justice Roberts is an unreliable justice, more concerned with tradition and legacy than with undying loyalty to Trump and all things evangelical.

He's no liberal, but he's unlikely to overturn a decision without a compelling argument.

If Trump/McConnell can replace RBG, then Roe is toast.

the Right-Wing Fundamentals have. I would bet that neither number is very high.

The link should go to the Amici signature list directly. If it doesn't, go to page 51 of the PDF

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-1323/127231/20200102104952653_18-1323%20Amicus%20Brief%20of%20207%20Members%20of%20Congress.pdf

first and foremost instead of this BS deflection mantra that they are trying to set-up.............................there party is going down in flames and they are worried about the right to privacy that has already been decided........................

So much for their message that impeachment will be bad for Democrats.

again.......................they are still dangerous .................

Like a cornered beast. Anyone underestimating is going to be disappointed. It will get worse as the election approaches.

Lady parts and lady independent decisions must drive them all mad... as in crazy and hateful.

SCOTUS doesn't have to do squat. I mean, I'm sure some of them want to but there has to be a case, new evidence, etc., right?

205 weren't identified as Republicans, but of course it was pointed out who the two Democrats were. Both sides-both sides-both sides-both sides. So obvious.

01/02/2020 03:59 pm ET

200-Plus Members Of Congress Just Asked The Supreme Court To Revisit Roe v. Wade

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/congress-scotus-brief-louisiana-abortion_n_5e0e3c6be4b0b2520d1e9dd1



More than 200 members of the U.S. House and Senate signed on to an amicus brief Thursday decrying the “unworkability” of current abortion rights and asking the Supreme Court to reconsider some of its key decisions on the issue.
..........................................
..................


A discrepancy across the judicial system about what defines an undue burden on a large fraction of women seeking abortion, which is the standard upheld by Roe v. Wade in 1973, “illustrates the unworkability of the ‘right to abortion’ found in Roe v. Wade ... and the need for the Court to again take up the issue of whether Roe and Casey should be reconsidered and, if appropriate, overruled,” the brief states.

...............................................


..........Much of the brief is dedicated to enumerating clinic protocol violations at various Louisiana abortion clinics, something Scalise highlighted in a statement he issued Thursday.

“I urge the Supreme Court to uphold this law which ensures the health and safety violations meant to protect Louisianans from the very abortionists who don’t want high standards,” he said.

But doctors and reproductive rights activists say that narrative is highly misleading. With a less than 1% rate of major complications, abortion is one of the safest medical procedures offered. In fact, there’s a higher rate of hospitalization for wisdom tooth removal than there is for abortion.

you can add on the presumptuousness of their attitudes to the personal lives of people...