Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(129,111 posts)
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 01:05 PM Jan 2020

Bolton Says He Is Willing to Testify in Impeachment Trial

Source: New York Times




WASHINGTON — John R. Bolton, the former White House national security adviser, said on Monday that he was willing to testify at President Trump’s impeachment trial if he was subpoenaed.

“I have concluded that, if the Senate issues a subpoena for my testimony, I am prepared to testify,” Mr. Bolton said in a statement on his website.

The development is a dramatic turn in the impeachment proceeding, which has been stalled over Democrats’ insistence on hearing from critical witnesses Mr. Trump blocked from testifying in the House inquiry into his pressure campaign on Ukraine. Mr. Bolton is a potential bombshell of a witness, with crucial knowledge of the president’s actions and conversations regarding Ukraine that could fill out key blanks in the narrative of the impeachment case.

His willingness to tell the Senate what he knows ratchets up pressure on Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky, who has refused to commit to calling witnesses at the impeachment trial, to change his stance. But it is unclear how the White House will respond to Mr. Bolton’s declaration, or whether the former national security adviser would defy a direct order not to testify.

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/06/us/politics/bolton-testify-impeachment-trial.html





CNN

John Bolton says he is prepared to testify in Senate trial if subpoenaed
Kylie Atwood

By Kylie Atwood, CNN

Updated 11:59 AM ET, Mon January 6, 2020



(CNN)Former White House national security adviser John Bolton said Monday he is willing to testify in the Senate's impeachment trial of President Donald Trump if Bolton is subpoenaed.
"Accordingly, since my testimony is once again at issue, I have had to resolve the serious competing issues as best I could, based on careful consideration and study," Bolton said in a statement. "I have concluded that, if the Senate issues a subpoena for my testimony, I am prepared to testify."

This story is breaking and will be updated.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/06/politics/john-bolton-testify-impeachment-subpoena/index.html
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bolton Says He Is Willing to Testify in Impeachment Trial (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 OP
Weird timing, right after he got a hard on after Trump attacked Iran. Mr. Sparkle Jan 2020 #1
So do I! True Blue American Jan 2020 #3
He is rotten fish BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #4
Was wondering the same Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2020 #11
Well, that's nice PatSeg Jan 2020 #2
Somebody Help Me Out, Here... The_Counsel Jan 2020 #5
Moscow Mitch has already said he won't allow witnesses Sanity Claws Jan 2020 #6
I'm sure this will come under tRump's, "Executive Privilege" category Bayard Jan 2020 #7
It's a trap. Because he's not been deposed yet, there's no telling what he might say RockRaven Jan 2020 #8
So Bolton has dirt on Trump; Bolton gets his war; Bolton now wants to testify. Trump beholden to yet AnotherMother4Peace Jan 2020 #9
I hope I'm wrong about Bolton's intentions. nt AnotherMother4Peace Jan 2020 #10
The House should subpoena him anew, if possible. His refusal would justify more articles, held anew. FreepFryer Jan 2020 #12
This is just another ploy duforsure Jan 2020 #13
JOHN BOLTON (his name must always be yelled due to his anger management issues) Javaman Jan 2020 #14
That's probably exactly what he's thinking! BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #15
Then the house needs to subpoena him.... getagrip_already Jan 2020 #16
They were about to but then he balked and said to "let the courts decide" BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #19
It's an empty promise. tRump Administation will appeal, Pathwalker Jan 2020 #17
"Donald Trump is a Great President," Bolton will testify Southern Blueneck Jan 2020 #18
I don't trust Bolton y'all. Not one iota. Why agree to testify now? SKKY Jan 2020 #20
O'Donnell's theory is that for Bolton's DeminPennswoods Jan 2020 #21

Mr. Sparkle

(2,935 posts)
1. Weird timing, right after he got a hard on after Trump attacked Iran.
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 01:10 PM
Jan 2020

Maybe because he is John Bolton, and a republican, i smell something fishy.

BumRushDaShow

(129,111 posts)
4. He is rotten fish
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 01:14 PM
Jan 2020

because he "promised" to do the same if subpoenaed by the House but then when the threat came to subpoena him, he suddenly said he wanted to wait for the courts to decide whether he could testify or not if given one.

Fuck him.

The_Counsel

(1,660 posts)
5. Somebody Help Me Out, Here...
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 01:20 PM
Jan 2020

...but if Bolton is the former National Security Advisor, how can the White House "order" him to do ANYTHING? Seems they shouldn't be able to tell him he CAN'T testify. What'll they do if he does? Fire him?

Sanity Claws

(21,849 posts)
6. Moscow Mitch has already said he won't allow witnesses
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 01:21 PM
Jan 2020

so this is just an empty statement.
Will he make himself available to House investigators who are looking at additional impeachment articles? He didn't say that.

Bayard

(22,100 posts)
7. I'm sure this will come under tRump's, "Executive Privilege" category
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 01:22 PM
Jan 2020

I suppose Bolton could thumb his nose at that, giving the manner in which he left.

RockRaven

(14,974 posts)
8. It's a trap. Because he's not been deposed yet, there's no telling what he might say
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 01:33 PM
Jan 2020

in response to questions the House-appointed managers *think* they know the answers to. You can't risk it.

Plus, a McConnell-controlled Senate will allow him to perjure himself and make bogus privilege claims without consequence. They would never make a criminal referral to the DOJ, and even if they did Barr would shut it down.

AnotherMother4Peace

(4,247 posts)
9. So Bolton has dirt on Trump; Bolton gets his war; Bolton now wants to testify. Trump beholden to yet
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 01:39 PM
Jan 2020

another self serving piece of shit. Note that Bolton issued his "statement" from his PAC indicating his intent is to remain a major play in the GOP.

FreepFryer

(7,077 posts)
12. The House should subpoena him anew, if possible. His refusal would justify more articles, held anew.
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 02:21 PM
Jan 2020

If he is only willing to testify before the Senate, and not the House, that provides Speaker Pelsoi and the House leadership lots of room to hold the existing articles out of the same partisanship concerns.

I focus on the House more than the Senate because frankly I’m concerned that any concessions made by McConnell will ultimately be ignored or ratfucked to splinters.

duforsure

(11,885 posts)
13. This is just another ploy
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 02:30 PM
Jan 2020

For him to sell books with, but the House does need to serve him one now ASAP to tell them.

Javaman

(62,530 posts)
14. JOHN BOLTON (his name must always be yelled due to his anger management issues)
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 02:46 PM
Jan 2020

has been having wet dreams about carpet bombing Iran.

now that trump has stepped on his own dick into a possible war, JOHN BOLTON now wants to testify against the orange asshole.

I think the first words out of JOHN BOLTONS mouth will be, "HE'S DOING IT WRONG!!!#$#%@!!!!)

getagrip_already

(14,764 posts)
16. Then the house needs to subpoena him....
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 03:39 PM
Jan 2020

Since the house will be prosecuting, they have the right to depose him in private ahead of his testimony.

Hey, the gop wants process. This is process.

Let's see him dance around that.

BumRushDaShow

(129,111 posts)
19. They were about to but then he balked and said to "let the courts decide"
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 03:56 PM
Jan 2020

and he would only comply based on what was happening with the McGahn court case, so the House moved on without him.

Apparently there were arguments that did happen at an Appeals Court (3-judge panel) last week so whatever happens there might make some difference (outside of either side probably appealing again either for an en banc review and/or to the SCOTUS) -

'Food fight' or congressional oversight? Appeals court weighs whether to enforce subpoenas issued in impeachment inquiry
Bart Jansen and Kevin Johnson, USA TODAY Published 9:04 a.m. CT Jan. 3, 2020 | Updated 2:56 p.m. CT Jan. 3, 2020


WASHINGTON – House lawyers told a federal appeals court Friday that President Donald Trump faces the prospect of new articles of impeachment as they asked judges to give them access to secret testimony gathered during the Russia investigation and to force former White House counsel Donald McGahn to testify before Congress. The Justice Department, which appealed rulings by two district courts, vehemently argued against both efforts. But their challenges were met with deep skepticism from some members of the two judicial panels.

“Has there ever been an instance of such a broad scale of defiance of Congress?” Judge Thomas Griffith asked Justice Department lawyer Hashim Mooppan, referring to the Trump administration's refusal to cooperate with the House impeachment inquiry. “Has that ever happened?” Mooppan acknowledged there may be no precedent, yet he pressed to block McGahn’s testimony by arguing the courts have no authority to intervene in a largely political dispute.

The blunt exchange was part of a morning-long clash in back-to-back hearings in which House lawyers said the impeachment inquiry against Trump remains open. New charges could be brought, they said, if McGahn testifies and if the House reviews grand jury testimony behind the conclusions of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election.

Last month, the House approved two articles of impeachment against the president. One article accuses Trump of abusing his power by withholding military aid in order to pressure Ukraine to announce investigations into a political rival. The other accuses him of obstructing Congress by stonewalling most of its subpoenas for documents and testimony.

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2020/01/03/house-appeals-court-hearing-compel-don-mcgahn-testimony-trump-impeachment/2740779001/

Pathwalker

(6,598 posts)
17. It's an empty promise. tRump Administation will appeal,
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 03:46 PM
Jan 2020

sending it to the courts, where it will sit for months. IOW, bullshit promise.

 
18. "Donald Trump is a Great President," Bolton will testify
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 03:55 PM
Jan 2020

Now that Putin's Agent Orange has given him the attack on Iran he's been lusting after since forever.

SKKY

(11,813 posts)
20. I don't trust Bolton y'all. Not one iota. Why agree to testify now?
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:48 PM
Jan 2020

It makes no sense and I fear we’re somehow being set up.

DeminPennswoods

(15,286 posts)
21. O'Donnell's theory is that for Bolton's
Tue Jan 7, 2020, 08:35 AM
Jan 2020

wet dream of "regime change" in Iran actually to succeed, he needs a President Pence along with SoS Pompeo in office. Therefore, his decision to testify if subpoenaed might be enough to cause "regime change" at home first.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bolton Says He Is Willing...