Iraqi security forces raid Baghdad's main protest camp, shoot at demonstrators
Source: Reuters
(Reuters) - Iraqi security forces raided Baghdad's main protest site at Tahrir Square on Saturday, firing live rounds and tear gas at anti-government demonstrators who have camped out there for months, Reuters reporters said.
There were no immediate reports of casualties but at least seven people were wounded in clashes with police earlier in the day, medics and security sources said.
The clashes took place after authorities began removing concrete barriers near Tahrir Square and across at least one main bridge over the Tigris River in Baghdad.
In the southern city of Basra, security forces raided the main anti-government sit-in overnight and deployed in force to stop protesters gathering there again, security sources said. Police arrested at least 16 protesters in Basra, they said.
Read more: https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN1ZO0AN?__twitter_impression=true
McKim
(2,412 posts)It is past time for US to get out of Iraq. Having a toehold there to prevent the final phases of The New Silk Road is just not worth it. The New Silk Road is inevitable and we had best be trading with those countries. Domination is barbaric and just not going to work in the 21st century.
Igel
(35,317 posts)Those are anti-government. Some protest corruption, some protest Iranian influence.
as-Sadr's folk pulled out last night, according to the article. So most of those left are those protesting Iranian influence. Meaning that this is a kind of "we're going to support Iranian control of Iraq, how dare you heretics oppose the Sons of Light" move, and those supporting it are left with either saying, "We don't care if Iraq is in Iran's orbit and dominated by Iranian hegemony and imperialism" or "we welcome Iranian influence because we think they're a lot better than us--just look at how much better they treat religious minorities and gays!"
The New Silk Road is, by the way, to a large extent domination. Overall, it's working very well in the 21st century, thank you. The question isn't, "Domination or no domination?" That answer's a given. The question is, "US domination or Chinese/Iranian/Russian domination?"
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Last edited Sat Jan 25, 2020, 03:18 PM - Edit history (1)
Not sure of these particular protests but that is common sentiment that they don't want to be in the middle of this Iran-US conflict.
They also have legitimate concerns with the Iraqi government that this US-Iran conflict has been overshadowing their reasons for protests.
IronLionZion
(45,449 posts)glad the US has liberated the Iraqi people from oppression. Onward to Iran next
LiberalLovinLug
(14,174 posts)All those lives of Americans. lives of innocent Iraqis, all the wounded, both physically and mentally...on both sides. All the mass migration caused. The rise of ISIS that had a place to fill in the void left over.
But but but .. at least Iraq is now a free democratic nation right? FREEDOM!!! When they interviewed Cheney years after he said he'd gladly do it all over again. Then again of course he would, his self-serving no-bid reconstruction projects, many still unfinished, to Halliburton, dragged them out of near bankruptcy into a multi-billion dollar company.
Jopin Klobe
(779 posts)... shit ... I mean ... Rumsfeld happens ...