Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,655 posts)
Wed Feb 26, 2020, 08:10 PM Feb 2020

Court OKs Texas winner-take-all presidential elector system

Source: Associated Press


Kevin Mcgill, Associated Press
Updated 4:01 pm CST, Wednesday, February 26, 2020

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — The winner-take-all system Texas and 47 other states use to assign Electoral College presidential votes is constitutional, a federal appeals court said Wednesday.

A three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans unanimously upheld a lower court's dismissal of a lawsuit challenging the Texas system. It was the latest defeat for organizations challenging such systems in Texas and three other states. Cases are pending at the appellate level in at least two of those cases.

Domingo Garcia, national president of the League of United Latin American Citizens, a lead plaintiff in the case, said he expects the issue to wind up at the Supreme Court. LULAC said in a news release that it was considering its next move. The league and its allies could request a rehearing by the full 5th Circuit, which has 16 active members, or go straight to the Supreme Court.

. . .

Among those pushing the challenges are LULAC and attorney David Boies, who represented then-Vice President Al Gore in the litigation over the Florida vote count in the 2000 presidential election. The challenges say the winner-take-all system violates the “one-person, one-vote” principle arising from constitutional equal protection and freedom of association rights.

Read more: https://www.chron.com/news/texas/article/Court-OKs-Texas-winner-take-all-presidential-15086187.php

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court OKs Texas winner-take-all presidential elector system (Original Post) Judi Lynn Feb 2020 OP
And what if a Democrat wins Texas?........... Iliyah Feb 2020 #1
Let me guess how SCOTUS will rule. BigmanPigman Feb 2020 #2
9-0 if it ever makes it to the Supreme Court. n/t PoliticAverse Feb 2020 #3
5-4, we still have 4 people with functioning brains on the court... Moderateguy Feb 2020 #6
Yes, the 4 can read and that's why it'd be 9-0.... PoliticAverse Feb 2020 #7
I think that the Constitution is pretty clear that the states have the right to distribute their totodeinhere Feb 2020 #4
The Constitution cannot be Unconstitutional sarisataka Feb 2020 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author brooklynite Feb 2020 #8
 

Moderateguy

(945 posts)
6. 5-4, we still have 4 people with functioning brains on the court...
Wed Feb 26, 2020, 10:51 PM
Feb 2020

Although RBG is hanging on by a thread

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
7. Yes, the 4 can read and that's why it'd be 9-0....
Wed Feb 26, 2020, 11:12 PM
Feb 2020
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

totodeinhere

(13,059 posts)
4. I think that the Constitution is pretty clear that the states have the right to distribute their
Wed Feb 26, 2020, 08:46 PM
Feb 2020

electoral votes as they see fit.

sarisataka

(18,836 posts)
5. The Constitution cannot be Unconstitutional
Wed Feb 26, 2020, 09:20 PM
Feb 2020
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress...


Their error is in thinking the popular vote has any relationship to choosing the Electors beyond it being customary. It is a widespread misconception.

Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Court OKs Texas winner-ta...