EU wants $12 billion annual trade sanctions on U.S. in Boeing row
Source: Reuters
(Reuters) - The European Union asked the World Trade Organization on Thursday for the right to impose annual trade sanctions worth up to $12 billion (7.4 billion pounds) on the United States in retaliation for illegal subsidies to plane maker Boeing.
The request is the latest legal move in the world's biggest trade dispute, over subsidies for Boeing and its European rival Airbus, which has lasted more than seven years so far.
"This follows the EU's assessment that the United States had not lived up to its obligation to remove its illegal subsidies in the aircraft sector, as required by the WTO rulings that clearly condemned U.S. subsidies to Boeing," the EU said in a statement.
The figure of $12 billion was "based on estimates of the damages suffered by the EU due to unfair and biased competition from the U.S. industry," it said.
Read more: http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/09/27/uk-wto-boeing-idUKBRE88Q0Q320120927
pampango
(24,692 posts)In Boeing's case, the deadline for the United States to comply with the WTO ruling was last Sunday. The EU has rejected its claim to have done so.
The European demand for sanctions mirrors a U.S. claim to the right to impose up to $10 billion of sanctions on the EU.
Both claims are effectively frozen until other legal avenues have been exhausted, and many experts expect the two sides will settle the dispute outside the courtroom rather than let the tit-for-tat litigation drag on for years longer.
Sounds like both Europe and the US have been proven by arbitration panels to subsidize their aircraft industries. The question now seems to be which side does it more and how to resolve the issue.
The lawyers and negotiators will be busy for years on this one.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)this?
ROBROX
(392 posts)I think both sides buy planes for their government use such as military. I do not know of direct money for selling? I guess corporate subsidies for the wealthy is still the way to go to earn money.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)But China isn't the only country that engages in this. Note, too, that this started under George W. Bush. Not sure why this subsidy has not been addressed by Obama, however.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)Maybe '06 is just the last year they had numbers for, though, so I'm not sure if its even still going on. If I understand correctly, this has been in the courts for a long time.