U.S. Republicans push for coronavirus lawsuit immunity for business
Source: Reuters
The top Republicans in the U.S. Congress displayed a united front on Friday in their drive to include coronavirus-related liability protections for businesses, saying such measures will be crucial to talks about future relief legislation.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and House of Representatives Republican leader Kevin McCarthy issued a joint statement redoubling their demands that Americans on the front lines of this fight must receive strong protections from frivolous lawsuits.
Senate and House Republicans agree these protections will be absolutely essential to future discussions surrounding recovery legislation, they said.
The statement marks a hardening line of demarcation between Republicans and Democrats over the question of business liability as the two sides spar over the prospects of a new coronavirus relief package. Democrats are pushing for nearly $1 trillion in federal assistance to states and local governments.
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-congress/u-s-republicans-push-for-coronavirus-lawsuit-immunity-for-business-idUSKBN22D5MG
Remember this next time you hear a conservative campaigning for "business friendly" policies.
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)Didn't General Cockwomble say that we should sue people and "make a lot of money"?
Brainfodder
(6,423 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(57,489 posts)RainCaster
(10,884 posts)WTF is wrong with these clowns?
Oh yeah- they're Republicans- that's how they do things.
ancianita
(36,071 posts)More lessons on how socialism for capitalists works.
OAITW r.2.0
(24,504 posts)I can understand protecting businesses from the actions of a political party that recklessly endangers the public to serve their political/economic interests.
onecaliberal
(32,863 posts)stopbush
(24,396 posts)You were laid off. Youre now on unemployment. In most states, once your employer calls you back to work you must go back to work. Failure to return to works counts as your turning down work, and that disqualifies you from getting UI benefits.
Now, if an employer is worried that his employees might get sick by returning to work prematurely, and that they might well sue them for endangering their lives, they may think twice about calling workers back prematurely. They might make return to work conditional on the employees level of fear.
But if the government indemnifies the employer by making legal action impossible, they are incentivized to call their workers back, knowing that any who refuse work will not be coming after them if the government stops their UI benefits.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,005 posts)Roc2020
(1,616 posts)Pelosi going along with that. Yes I see the other side too where corporations want protection against covid 19 lawsuits. But the optics for the GOP looks awful where the american worker has no recourse if they risk their lives to come out to work, get the virus and then their employer says...tough luck. ???. Just keeps getting worse.
Marrah_Goodman
(1,586 posts)pecosbob
(7,541 posts)keithbvadu2
(36,827 posts)IF? - If employers provide full health coverage for medical treatment for coronavirus and sick pay?
After all, aren't they saying it's not much of a risk?