Steve King, House Republican With a History of Racist Remarks, Loses Primary
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Omaha Steve (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: NYT
Representative Steve King of Iowa, the nine-term Republican with a history of racist comments who only recently became a party pariah, lost his bid for renomination early Wednesday, one of the biggest defeats of the 2020 primary season in any state.
In a five-way primary, Mr. King was defeated by Randy Feenstra, a state senator, who had the backing of mainstream state and national Republicans who found Mr. King an embarrassment and, crucially, a threat to a safe Republican seat if he were on the ballot in November.
The defeat was most likely the final political blow to one of the nations most divisive elected officials, whose insults of undocumented immigrants foretold the messaging of President Trump, and whose flirtations with extremism led him far from rural Iowa, to meetings with anti-Muslim crusaders in Europe and an endorsement of a Toronto mayoral candidate with neo-Nazi ties.
In interviews over the years, voters in Iowas most conservative region downplayed Mr. Kings incendiary comments. His loss after 18 years in office was mainly because opponents painted him as ineffective after party leaders in Congress stripped him of his committee assignments last year.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/03/us/politics/steve-king-iowa-primary.html
Of course, racist Iowans didn't remove him due to racism, just the consequences of racism.
But, I'll take it!
So long, motherfucker!!!
2020 officially doesn't entirely suck....
on edit: fixed link
bucolic_frolic
(43,147 posts)because it means Republican voters are starting to recognize and reject racism. That has large implications for Trump's diminishing ability to retain his own base in November.
pwb
(11,261 posts)But now they know who he is.
rurallib
(62,411 posts)He is just not as blatant.
Plus had King won the primary we would have had a very good shot at winning the general. Iam not saying Democrat JD Scholten can't win, but this made it harder.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)Totally agree that Scholten has a tougher fight now.
pwb
(11,261 posts)Now we can win that seat.
suegeo
(2,573 posts)dalton99a
(81,475 posts)Dopers_Greed
(2,640 posts)Republicans voted against him from the POV of "His antics cost him clout in Congress, so he can't adequetely represent us."
Had King not been stripped of his positions, he would have won again.
The unforgivable sin to the American electorate is looking weak.
manhattan123
(302 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)I'm pretty sure it's a duplicate, but you be the judge.
rurallib
(62,411 posts)The idea of LBN is to have one major post on a breaking news story.
DU is filled with many posts on on stories in various forums.
This one is in the Iowa forum for those of us fro Iowa to give our perspective to what will most likely be a readership of fellow Iowans who are the ones to most likely to check in here.
djacq
(1,634 posts)Will Randy Feenstra be worst?
Vote Blue!
rurallib
(62,411 posts)who may not have voted or who may have voted against Republicans with King on the ballot. Without the 4th district Iowa is a democratic state.
Omaha Steve
(99,618 posts)Dupe. See the earlier post here: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142506016
Statement of Purpose
Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.