James Bennet Resigns As Editorial Page Editor of The New York Times; Katie Kingsbury Named Acting Ed
Source: New York Times
The New York Times announced today that James Bennet, Editorial Page Editor since May, 2016, is resigning effective immediately. The Times also announced that the deputy editorial page editor Jim Dao is stepping off the masthead and being reassigned to the newsroom.
Katie Kingsbury, who joined The Times in 2017, has been named as acting Editorial Page Editor through the November election.
Times publisher A.G. Sulzberger said, James is a journalist of enormous talent and integrity who believes deeply in the mission of The Times. He oversaw a significant transformation of the Opinion department, which broadened the range of voices we publish and pushed us into new formats like video, graphics and audio. Im grateful for his many contributions.
Katie has been instrumental in reimagining Opinion since she joined The Times from the Boston Globe, where she served as managing editor for digital and won a Pulitzer Prize for editorial writing. I look forward to working with her as she steps into this role at this important moment.
Read more: https://www.nytco.com/press/james-bennet-resigns-as-editorial-page-editor-of-the-new-york-times-katie-kingsbury-named-acting-editorial-page-editor/
lapucelle
(18,276 posts)Yavin4
(35,442 posts)It was over the line.
Scarsdale
(9,426 posts)Went behind President Obama's back, communicating with Tehran while the President was working on negotiations. He is a traitor, and needs to be voted OUT of office. He has "dead eyes" like Moscow Mitch. Maybe that is a sign of traitors - dead eyes? No soul. I think he envisions himself in the WH someday - God forbid.
Thekaspervote
(32,778 posts)msongs
(67,420 posts)Zorro
(15,740 posts)The NYT needs to act like the newspaper of record they claim to be. People have had enough of their bothsiderism.
irisblue
(32,982 posts)Hired Bed Bug Brett Stephens, who I hope leaves soon.
RobinA
(9,894 posts)Several editors of the Philadelphia Inquirer resigned This weekend because of a headline, Buildings Matter, Too, that raised a big ruckus. The headline was ill advised and the Cotton letter was unpopular. I certainly dont agree with Cotton, but even more I dont agree with newspapers muzzling themselves when it comes to unpopular content. And people think this is OK. Very frightening.
Mr.Bill
(24,303 posts)is like saying Trump sometimes misspeaks.
Cotton called for unconstitutional use of the military. That kind of talk needs to be made public as a news story, not presented as a valid opinion on the editorial page. The editorial page is a place for constructive criticism and a proposed solution to a problem, not a call for action outside the bounds of law.
Thekaspervote
(32,778 posts)Lonestarblue
(10,016 posts)Its the opinion of the KKK that black people should be second class citizens without the rights of white people, but that opinion deserves none of the credence that being published by the NYT would give it. In its effort to remain nonpartisan, the Times has bent over backwards to accommodate conservative viewpoints. Im willing to see different viewpoints about how we can accomplish goals of moving the country forward. Im not willing to waste my time on viewpoints that push an authoritarian rule narrative. I suspect that most Times subscribers feel the same.
I came very close to cancelling my subscription over the Cotton piece. Ill take a wait and see attitude now because I enjoy reading several of the Times opinion writers (Maureen Dowd and Bret Stephens are not among them). I so believe in supporting a free press that I subscribe to far more publications than I should, but I think the Times needs some serious changes. If they go after Joe Biden the way they went after Hillary Clinton, Im done.
FM123
(10,053 posts)ToxMarz
(2,169 posts)As opposed to being WRONG. It's possible they were both, and the issue with their employment was they were just wrong.
killaphill
(212 posts)Its refreshing in fact. Promoting "balanced" opinions is not the same as promoting "dangerous" opinions. This editor made a grievous error, and its best he leave.
BumRushDaShow
(129,118 posts)(which wasn't on the front page but was on pg. A-12) only underscored the very thing that many of us call "institutionalized racism". And the "media" is an "institution" that has the very large megaphone that continues to perpetuate it.
A racist trope should not be considered "unpopular content". It should be considered "racist content not fit to print".
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)newspaper should print it.
yardwork
(61,650 posts)The editor they just assigned is a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist.
mcar
(42,334 posts)didn't bother reading it, then defended its publication as "need diverse viewpoints."
NYT needs to take a good long look in the mirror as they go forward. I don't expect them to be liberal or conservative, but I do expect them to not publish nonsense, drivel, and incitements to the military occupation of this country.
bronxiteforever
(9,287 posts)The Polack MSgt
(13,190 posts)I expect them to be what they are.
Compromised.
Complicit.
Cowardly.
What he should have said was - Both Sides!
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)cartoons in the NYT.
In case anyone doesn't remember, here's a piece from the Nation that discusses the event:
Cartoons are powerfulso much so that The New York Times is cracking down on them.
By Jeet Heer
JUNE 18, 2019
Utopias are defined as much by what they exclude as by their promises of plenitude. Plato dreamed of an ideal republic free of pestilent poets. The editors of The New York Times, more mundanely but equally tellingly, aspire to a newspaper that employs no cartoonists. In the wake of a controversy over the international edition of the Times running a cartoon of Benjamin Netanyahu that was widely condemned as anti-Semitic, the newspaper severed its relationship with the syndicate that supplied the offending image and now has let go of the services of two in-house cartoonists, Patrick Chappatte and Heng Kim Song.
Speaking for many in his profession, Joel Pett, a Pulitzer Prizewinning editorial cartoonist for Kentuckys Lexington Herald-Leader, decried the decision as chickenshit and cowardly. More politely, CNNs Jake Tapper told The Daily Beast that this was just one more nail in the coffin of what is a struggling art form, given how corporate America has taken over local newspapers and gutted the industry.
Its undeniable that editorial cartooning, even more than journalism as a whole, is in crisis. A 2012 report by the Herblock Foundation found that there were fewer than 40 editorial cartoonists with newspaper-staff jobs in America, a steep decline from more than 2,000 such positions in the beginning of the 20th century. The situation has gotten only more dire since that report, with the high-profile firing of Rob Rogers from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette for penning anti-Trump cartoons. Newspaper editorial cartooning is well on the path to extinction, a dire end for a vital art that has been inextricable from modern political protest.
Times editorial-page editor James Bennet, also speaking to The Daily Beast, denies that the move was an outgrowth of the Netanyahu cartoon (although, inconsistently, he admits that canceling the subscription service sped up the decision to let go of Chappatte and Heng). Bennet maintains that hes been thinking of axing cartoons from the paper for more than a year. If so, that makes Bennet and the Times look worse, since this was not an individual act of poltroonery but a more systematic aversion to visual satire. In recent years, other newspapers have fired cartoonists for economic reasons or because they did work that offended readers. But the Times (contra President Trump) isnt failing economically. Nor did Chappatte and Heng do offensive work. They were fired simply because Times editors have an antipathy to editorial cartooning.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,624 posts)samsingh
(17,599 posts)and i hate his smug little face.
Paladin
(28,265 posts)Last edited Mon Jun 8, 2020, 11:59 AM - Edit history (1)
We need a genuinely liberal NYT editorial staff. If I want to view tepid conservative jerkoffs, there are plenty of other places.